• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

左心室辅助装置的回声优化对功能能力的影响:一项随机对照试验。

Effects of echo-optimization of left ventricular assist devices on functional capacity, a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Verona, Piazzale Aristide Stefani, 1, Verona, 37126, Italy.

出版信息

ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Aug;8(4):2846-2855. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13359. Epub 2021 May 2.

DOI:10.1002/ehf2.13359
PMID:33934564
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8318497/
Abstract

AIMS

After the implantation of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD), many patients continue to experience exercise intolerance. VAFRACT trial evaluates the additional benefit of LVAD echo-guided optimization (EO) on functional capacity (FC), measured by cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET), and quality of life (QoL).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to EO (EO group) vs. standard settings (CONTROL group) at least after 3 months from LVAD implant procedure. The optimal device speed was defined as the one that allows an intermittent aortic valve opening and a neutral position of the interventricular septum without increasing aortic or tricuspid regurgitation and preserving right ventricular function. The primary endpoint was peak oxygen uptake (VO peak) change after 3 months. Echo-guided optimization significantly improves VO peak (from 13.2 ± 2.5 to 14.2 ± 2.5 mL/kg/min; P < 0.001), oxygen pulse (from 9.75 ± 1.46 to 10.75 ± 2.2 mL; P < 0.001), CPET exercise time (from 490 ± 98 to 526 ± 116 s; P = 0.02), 6 min walk distance (from 363 ± 54 to 391 ± 52 m; P = 0.04), and QoL, using EuroQol Five Dimensions 3L (from 0.796 ± 0.1 to 0.85 ± 0.08; P < 0.001) and the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (from 81.6 ± 6.9 to 84.6 ± 5.6; P = 0.025).

CONCLUSIONS

Echo-guided optimization can significantly influence the FC and the QoL of LVAD patients. This procedure should represent a fundamental step in their clinical management, through the establishment of consolidated follow-up protocols. Our study may represent a starting point for a future, adequately powered clinical trial with a longer term follow-up.

摘要

目的

在植入左心室辅助装置(LVAD)后,许多患者仍会出现运动不耐受。VAFRACT 试验评估了 LVAD 超声引导优化(EO)对心肺运动试验(CPET)测量的功能能力(FC)和生活质量(QoL)的额外益处。

方法和结果

27 名患者按 1:1 的比例随机分为 EO(EO 组)与标准设置(对照组),至少在 LVAD 植入术后 3 个月进行。最佳设备速度定义为允许主动脉瓣间歇性开放且室间隔处于中立位置,而不增加主动脉瓣或三尖瓣反流并保持右心室功能的速度。主要终点是 3 个月后峰值摄氧量(VOpeak)的变化。超声引导优化可显著提高 VOpeak(从 13.2±2.5 增加到 14.2±2.5mL/kg/min;P<0.001)、氧脉冲(从 9.75±1.46 增加到 10.75±2.2mL;P<0.001)、CPET 运动时间(从 490±98 增加到 526±116s;P=0.02)、6 分钟步行距离(从 363±54 增加到 391±52m;P=0.04)和生活质量,采用 EuroQol Five Dimensions 3L(从 0.796±0.1 增加到 0.85±0.08;P<0.001)和堪萨斯城心肌病问卷(从 81.6±6.9 增加到 84.6±5.6;P=0.025)。

结论

超声引导优化可显著影响 LVAD 患者的 FC 和 QoL。该程序应通过建立综合的随访方案,成为其临床管理的基本步骤。我们的研究可能为未来具有更长随访时间的、充分有力的临床试验提供一个起点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73f9/8318497/52d40d015bc7/EHF2-8-2846-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73f9/8318497/488d383748aa/EHF2-8-2846-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73f9/8318497/459bf6d18043/EHF2-8-2846-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73f9/8318497/52d40d015bc7/EHF2-8-2846-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73f9/8318497/488d383748aa/EHF2-8-2846-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73f9/8318497/459bf6d18043/EHF2-8-2846-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73f9/8318497/52d40d015bc7/EHF2-8-2846-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Effects of echo-optimization of left ventricular assist devices on functional capacity, a randomized controlled trial.左心室辅助装置的回声优化对功能能力的影响:一项随机对照试验。
ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Aug;8(4):2846-2855. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13359. Epub 2021 May 2.
2
Exercise training in patients with a left ventricular assist device (Ex-VAD): rationale and design of a multicentre, prospective, assessor-blinded, randomized, controlled trial.左心室辅助装置(Ex-VAD)患者的运动训练:一项多中心、前瞻性、评估者盲法、随机、对照试验的原理和设计。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2019 Sep;21(9):1152-1159. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1431. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
3
Fine-tuning management of the Heart Assist 5 left ventricular assist device with two- and three-dimensional echocardiography.使用二维和三维超声心动图对Heart Assist 5左心室辅助装置进行微调管理。
Cardiovasc J Afr. 2016 Jul/Aug;27(4):208-212. doi: 10.5830/CVJA-2015-083.
4
Determinants of Improvement in Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.左心室辅助装置植入后心肺运动试验改善的决定因素。
ASAIO J. 2018 Sep/Oct;64(5):610-615. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000693.
5
Effect of increasing pump speed during exercise on peak oxygen uptake in heart failure patients supported with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device. A double-blind randomized study.在接受持续血流左心室辅助装置支持的心力衰竭患者中,运动时增加泵速对峰值摄氧量的影响。一项双盲随机研究。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2014 Apr;16(4):403-8. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.52.
6
Echo-guided left ventricular assist device speed optimisation for exercise maximisation.超声引导下左心室辅助装置速度优化以实现运动最大化。
Heart. 2022 Jun 10;108(13):1055-1062. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2021-320495.
7
Risk Assessment and Comparative Effectiveness of Left Ventricular Assist Device and Medical Management in Ambulatory Heart Failure Patients: The ROADMAP Study 2-Year Results.在门诊心力衰竭患者中左心室辅助装置和药物治疗的风险评估和比较效果:ROADMAP 研究 2 年结果。
JACC Heart Fail. 2017 Jul;5(7):518-527. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2017.02.016. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
8
Exercise performance of chronic heart failure patients in the early period of support by an axial-flow left ventricular assist device as destination therapy.作为目标治疗手段,轴流左心室辅助装置在慢性心力衰竭患者早期支持阶段的运动表现
Artif Organs. 2014 May;38(5):366-73. doi: 10.1111/aor.12172. Epub 2013 Oct 1.
9
Hemodynamic Response to Exercise in Patients Supported by Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices.连续血流左心室辅助装置支持患者的运动时的血液动力学反应。
JACC Heart Fail. 2020 Apr;8(4):291-301. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2019.10.013. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
10
Impact of right ventricular reserve on exercise capacity and quality of life in patients with left ventricular assist device.左心室辅助装置患者右心室储备对运动能力和生活质量的影响。
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2023 Mar 1;324(3):H355-H363. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00626.2022. Epub 2023 Jan 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Five-Year Outcome After Continuous Flow LVAD With Full-Magnetic (HeartMate 3) Versus Hybrid Levitation System (HeartWare): A Propensity-Score Matched Study From an All-Comers Multicentre Registry.连续血流左心室辅助装置(HeartMate 3)全磁悬浮与混合磁悬浮系统(HeartWare)五年后结局:一项来自多中心全人群注册研究的倾向性评分匹配研究。
Transpl Int. 2023 Sep 4;36:11675. doi: 10.3389/ti.2023.11675. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
The role of exercise hemodynamics in assessing patients with chronic heart failure and left ventricular assist devices.运动血液动力学在评估慢性心力衰竭和左心室辅助装置患者中的作用。
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2019 Oct;16(10):891-898. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2019.1675506. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
2
Third Annual Report From the ISHLT Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support Registry: A comparison of centrifugal and axial continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices.国际心肺移植学会机械循环支持注册研究第三年度报告:离心式与轴流式连续血流左心室辅助装置的比较。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2019 Apr;38(4):352-363. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2019.02.004.
3
Comprehensive effects of left ventricular assist device speed changes on alveolar gas exchange, sleep ventilatory pattern, and exercise performance.
左心室辅助装置速度变化对肺泡气体交换、睡眠通气模式和运动表现的综合影响。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2018 Nov;37(11):1361-1371. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2018.07.005. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
4
Lvad pump speed increase is associated with increased peak exercise cardiac output and vo, postponed anaerobic threshold and improved ventilatory efficiency.左心室辅助装置(LVAD)泵速增加与运动高峰心输出量增加、最大摄氧量增加、无氧阈值延迟及通气效率提高相关。
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Mar 1;230:28-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.12.112. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
5
Pump speed modulations and sub-maximal exercise tolerance in left ventricular assist device recipients: A double-blind, randomized trial.左心室辅助装置受者的泵速调节与亚最大运动耐量:一项双盲、随机试验。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017 Jan;36(1):36-41. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2016.06.020. Epub 2016 Jul 7.
6
Exercise capacity in ventricular assist device patients: clinical relevance of pump speed and power.心室辅助装置患者的运动能力:泵速和功率的临床相关性
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Oct;50(4):752-757. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezw147. Epub 2016 May 12.
7
Hemodynamic Ramp Tests in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices.左心室辅助装置患者的血流动力学斜坡试验。
JACC Heart Fail. 2016 Mar;4(3):208-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2015.10.001. Epub 2015 Dec 30.
8
Echocardiography in the Management of Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices: Recommendations from the American Society of Echocardiography.超声心动图在左心室辅助装置患者管理中的应用:美国超声心动图学会的建议
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015 Aug;28(8):853-909. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2015.05.008.
9
Perioperative Hypoalbuminemia Affects Improvement in Exercise Tolerance After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.围手术期低白蛋白血症影响左心室辅助装置植入术后运动耐量的改善。
Circ J. 2015;79(9):1970-5. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-15-0414. Epub 2015 May 28.
10
Exercise in heart failure patients supported with a left ventricular assist device.使用左心室辅助装置支持的心力衰竭患者的运动
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015 Apr;34(4):489-96. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2014.11.001. Epub 2014 Nov 8.