Schlemm Ludwig, von Rennenberg Regina, Siebert Eberhard, Bohner Georg, Flottmann Fabian, Petzold Gabor C, Thomalla Götz, Endres Matthias, Nolte Christian H
Klinik und Hochschulambulanz für Neurologie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany.
Neurol Res Pract. 2021 May 3;3(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s42466-021-00119-y.
Cervical artery dissection (CAD) is a rare cause of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) with large vessel occlusion (LVO) and may constitute a challenge for mechanical thrombectomy (MT). We compared procedural characteristics, reperfusion rates, and clinical outcome in AIS patients undergoing MT with and without CAD.
We performed a pre-specified analysis of patients registered within the German Stroke Registry, a prospectively maintained multicenter registry of consecutive patients with AIS patients treated by MT. Procedural characteristics included time periods and additional application of medication.
Of 2589 patients, 62 (2.4%) were diagnosed with CAD. CAD patients were younger, had lower rates of known vascular risk factors and larger baseline stroke volumes. MT in CAD patients took significantly longer (median [IQR] groin-puncture-to-flow restoration time: 98 [67-136] versus 70 [45-100] minutes; p < 0.001) and more often required use of intra-arterial medication (34.4% versus 15.6%; p < 0.001). Reperfusion success (modified Treatment in Cerebral Infarction score 2b-3: 85.2% versus 83.3%, p = 0.690) and favorable functional outcome after 3 months (modified Rankin Scale score ≤ 2: 70.9% versus 36.4%, adjusted p = 0.086) did not differ significantly between patients with and without CAD. The latter findings held true for both CAD in the anterior and posterior circulation.
CAD in AIS requiring MT is rare. MT in patients with CAD constitutes a particular procedural challenge, but still achieves favorable radiological and functional outcomes in most patients. Our data provide indirect evidence that MT is of clinical benefit in patients with AIS due to LVO and CAD.
颈动脉夹层(CAD)是急性缺血性卒中(AIS)伴大血管闭塞(LVO)的罕见病因,可能给机械取栓(MT)带来挑战。我们比较了接受MT的有CAD和无CAD的AIS患者的手术特征、再灌注率和临床结局。
我们对德国卒中登记处登记的患者进行了预先指定的分析,该登记处是一个前瞻性维护的多中心登记处,登记了连续接受MT治疗的AIS患者。手术特征包括时间段和药物的额外应用。
在2589例患者中,62例(2.4%)被诊断为CAD。CAD患者更年轻,已知血管危险因素的发生率更低,基线卒中体积更大。CAD患者的MT时间明显更长(中位[IQR]腹股沟穿刺至血流恢复时间:98[67 - 136]分钟对70[45 - 100]分钟;p < 0.001),且更常需要使用动脉内药物(34.4%对15.6%;p < 0.001)。有CAD和无CAD的患者之间,再灌注成功率(改良脑梗死治疗评分2b - 3:85.2%对83.3%,p = 0.690)和3个月后良好功能结局(改良Rankin量表评分≤2:70.9%对36.4%,校正p = 0.086)无显著差异。前后循环CAD患者的后一项结果均成立。
需要MT的AIS患者中CAD罕见。CAD患者的MT构成了特殊的手术挑战,但大多数患者仍能获得良好的影像学和功能结局。我们的数据间接证明MT对因LVO和CAD导致AIS的患者具有临床益处。