Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Instituto para el Estudio de la Biodiversidad de Invertebrados, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Salta, Av. Bolivia 5150, 4400 Salta, Argentina.
Department of Parasitology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Av. Antonio Carlos, 6627, Pampulha, CEP 31270-901, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Parasitology. 2021 Jul;148(8):962-974. doi: 10.1017/S0031182021000706. Epub 2021 May 3.
Due to conflicts between classic and molecular systematics of Camallanidae, different data types were used for the first time, to better understand the evolutionary history and taxa consistency within this family. Genetic [18S and 28S rDNA; cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) mtDNA], morphological and life history traits were used to infer phylogenies using Bayesian inference, reconstructed from separated and concatenated datasets. The consistency of tree and morphological traits was evaluated using the consistency index. Characters were mapped on the trees and the phylogenetic informativeness of genetic markers was estimated. Phylogenetic informativeness of 18S provided better resolution for outer nodes, COI for inners and 28S had an intermediate profile. New sequences for two camallanid species were obtained. Phylogenies of genetic and concatenated data largely agreed, showing more divergence in the COI dataset, due to its higher mutation rate vs stable morphology for diagnosing higher taxa. No genus sustained monophyly. The lack of autapomorphy and phylogenetic proximity supported the partition of Batrachocamallanus as synonym of Procamallanus and Spirocamallanus, which should not be considered as subgenera. Although traits of buccal capsule, male tail, habitat, host and biogeographic were highly consistent, intrinsic patterns varied according to different taxa assemblages. Morphological systematics of Camallanidae, based on buccal capsule, is artificial for certain taxa.
由于经典系统学和分子系统学在 Camallanidae 中的冲突,首次使用了不同的数据类型,以更好地了解该科内的进化历史和分类群一致性。使用贝叶斯推断,使用遗传(18S 和 28S rDNA;细胞色素 c 氧化酶亚基 I(COI)mtDNA)、形态和生活史特征,从分离和串联数据集重建系统发育。使用一致性指数评估树和形态特征的一致性。将特征映射到树上,并估计遗传标记的系统发育信息量。18S 提供了更好的分辨率,COI 提供了更好的内部节点分辨率,而 28S 则具有中等分辨率。获得了两种 Camallanidae 物种的新序列。遗传和串联数据的系统发育很大程度上一致,由于 COI 数据集的突变率较高,而形态稳定,因此分类群的分歧更大。没有属维持单系性。缺乏独特特征和系统发育接近性支持将 Batrachocamallanus 作为 Procamallanus 和 Spirocamallanus 的同义词进行分区,不应将其视为亚属。尽管口囊、雄性尾部、栖息地、宿主和生物地理特征高度一致,但内在模式根据不同的分类群组合而变化。基于口囊的 Camallanidae 形态系统学对于某些分类群是人为的。