Department of Chemistry, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185, Rome, Italy.
Department of Life Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via Giuseppe Campi 287, 41125, Modena, Italy; CNR NANOTEC, Campus Ecotekne, University of Salento, Via Monteroni, 73100, Lecce, Italy.
Talanta. 2021 Aug 1;230:122313. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2021.122313. Epub 2021 Mar 20.
Cannabis sativa is traditionally classified according to five chemotypes based on the concentration of the main phytocannabinoids tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), cannabidiol (CBD), and cannabigerol (CBG). However, cannabis chemovars and varieties very often present similar concentrations of such phytocannabinoids but different chemical profiles, which is unavoidably translated into different pharmacological effects when used for therapeutic purposes. For this reason, a more refined approach is needed for chemovar distinction, which is described in this study and named phytocannabinomics. The classification was achieved by a comprehensive characterization of the phytocannabinoid composition, by liquid chromatography coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry untargeted metabolomics for the detection of over a hundred phytocannabinoids, and data analysis by chemometrics for chemovars differentiation. The method was developed on fifty cannabis varieties, grown under the same conditions, and was validated to discriminate between the standard chemotypes by partial least squares discriminant analysis. Then, the method was extended to consider the entire chemical variety of the cannabis accessions, by an unsupervised approach based on the principal component analysis. The latter approach clearly indicated several new subgroups within the traditional classifications, which arise from a unique composition of the minor phytocannabinoids. The existence of these subgroups, which were never described before, is of critical importance for evaluating the pharmacological effects of cannabis chemovars.
大麻根据主要植物大麻素四氢大麻酚(THC)、大麻二酚(CBD)和大麻环萜酚(CBG)的浓度传统上分为五种化学型。然而,大麻化学型和品种通常具有相似浓度的此类植物大麻素,但化学特征不同,这不可避免地会转化为用于治疗目的时的不同药理作用。出于这个原因,需要一种更精细的方法来区分化学型,本研究对此进行了描述,并将其命名为植物大麻素组学。该分类方法通过对植物大麻素成分进行全面表征、液相色谱与高分辨质谱非靶向代谢组学检测一百多种植物大麻素、以及通过化学计量学数据分析进行化学型区分来实现。该方法在五十种大麻品种上进行了开发,这些品种在相同条件下种植,并通过偏最小二乘判别分析验证了对标准化学型的区分能力。然后,通过基于主成分分析的无监督方法,将该方法扩展到考虑大麻种属的整个化学多样性。后一种方法清楚地表明,在传统分类中存在几个新的亚组,这些亚组源于次要植物大麻素的独特组成。这些亚组的存在以前从未被描述过,对于评估大麻化学型的药理作用至关重要。