Xie Enzehua, Wu Jinlin, Qiu Juntao, Dai Lu, Qiu Jiawei, Luo Qipeng, Jiang Wenxiang, Cao Fangfang, Zhao Rui, Fan Shuya, Gao Wei, Guo Hongwei, Sun Xiaogang, Yu Cuntao
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Department of Cardiac Surgery, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Apr 15;8:638420. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.638420. eCollection 2021.
This study employed three surgical techniques: total arch replacement (TAR) with frozen elephant trunk (FET), aortic balloon occlusion technique (ABO) and hybrid aortic arch repair (HAR) on patients with type I aortic dissection in Fuwai Hospital, aiming to compare the early outcomes of these surgical armamentariums. From January 2016 to December 2018, an overall 633 patients (431 of TAR+FET, 122 of HAR, and 80 of ABO) with type I aortic dissection were included in the study. Thirty-day mortality, stroke, paraplegia, re-exploration for bleeding, and renal replacement therapy were compared using the matching weight method (MWM). After MWM process, the baseline characteristics were comparable among three TAR groups. It showed that ABO group had the longest cardiopulmonary bypass ( < 0.001) and aortic cross-clamp time ( < 0.001), while the operation time was longest in the HAR group ( = 0.039). There was no significant difference in 30-day mortality among groups ( = 0.783). Furthermore, the incidence of stroke ( = 0.679), paraplegia ( = 0.104), re-exploration for bleeding ( = 0.313), and CRRT ( = 0.834) demonstrated no significant difference. Of note, no significant differences were found regarding these outcomes even before using MWM. Based on the early outcomes, the three TAR approaches were equally applicable to type I aortic dissection. We may choose the specific procedure relatively flexibly according to patient status and surgeon's expertise. Importantly, long-term investigations are warranted to determine whether above approaches remain to be of equivalent efficacy and safety.
本研究对阜外医院I型主动脉夹层患者采用了三种手术技术:带冰冻象鼻的全弓置换术(TAR)、主动脉球囊阻断技术(ABO)和杂交主动脉弓修复术(HAR),旨在比较这些手术手段的早期疗效。2016年1月至2018年12月,本研究共纳入633例I型主动脉夹层患者(431例行TAR+FET,122例行HAR,80例行ABO)。采用匹配权重法(MWM)比较30天死亡率、卒中、截瘫、再次手术止血及肾脏替代治疗情况。经过MWM处理后,三个TAR组的基线特征具有可比性。结果显示,ABO组的体外循环时间最长(<0.001),主动脉阻断时间最长(<0.001),而HAR组的手术时间最长(=0.039)。各组间30天死亡率无显著差异(=0.783)。此外,卒中发生率(=0.679)、截瘫发生率(=0.104)、再次手术止血发生率(=0.313)及连续性肾脏替代治疗(CRRT)发生率(=0.834)均无显著差异。值得注意的是,即使在使用MWM之前,这些结果也没有显著差异。基于早期疗效,三种TAR方法对I型主动脉夹层同样适用。我们可以根据患者情况和外科医生的专业技能相对灵活地选择具体手术方式。重要的是,需要进行长期研究以确定上述方法是否仍具有同等的疗效和安全性。