T.C. Jenkins Department of Biophysics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Protein Sci. 2021 Aug;30(8):1606-1616. doi: 10.1002/pro.4096. Epub 2021 May 7.
This Perspective is intended to raise questions about the conventional interpretation of protein folding. According to the conventional interpretation, developed over many decades, a protein population can visit a vast number of conformations under unfolding conditions, but a single dominant native population emerges under folding conditions. Accordingly, folding comes with a substantial loss of conformational entropy. How is this price paid? The conventional answer is that favorable interactions between and among the side chains can compensate for entropy loss, and moreover, these interactions are responsible for the structural particulars of the native conformation. Challenging this interpretation, the Perspective introduces a proposal that high energy (i.e., unfavorable) excluding interactions winnow the accessible population substantially under physical-chemical conditions that favor folding. Both steric clash and unsatisfied hydrogen bond donors and acceptors are classified as excluding interactions, so called because conformers with such disfavored interactions will be largely excluded from the thermodynamic population. Both excluding interactions and solvent factors that induce compactness are somewhat nonspecific, yet together they promote substantial chain organization. Moreover, proteins are built on a backbone scaffold consisting of α-helices and strands of β-sheet, where the number of hydrogen bond donors and acceptors is exactly balanced. These repetitive secondary structural elements are the only two conformers that can be both completely hydrogen-bond satisfied and extended indefinitely without encountering a steric clash. Consequently, the number of fundamental folds is limited to no more than ~10,000 for a protein domain. Once excluding interactions are taken into account, the issue of "frustration" is largely eliminated and the Levinthal paradox is resolved. Putting the "bottom line" at the top: it is likely that hydrogen-bond satisfaction represents a largely under-appreciated parameter in protein folding models.
这篇观点文章旨在对蛋白质折叠的传统解释提出质疑。根据几十年来发展起来的传统解释,在展开条件下,蛋白质群体可以访问大量构象,但在折叠条件下会出现单一主导的天然群体。因此,折叠伴随着构象熵的大量损失。这个代价是如何付出的?传统的答案是,侧链之间和之间的有利相互作用可以补偿熵的损失,而且这些相互作用是天然构象结构细节的原因。挑战这一解释,本文提出了一个建议,即在有利于折叠的物理化学条件下,高能(即不利)排斥相互作用会大大筛选出可及的群体。空间位阻和未满足的氢键供体和受体都被归类为排斥相互作用,之所以这样称呼,是因为具有这种不受欢迎相互作用的构象将在热力学群体中基本排除在外。排斥相互作用和诱导紧凑性的溶剂因素都有些非特异性,但它们共同促进了大量的链组织。此外,蛋白质是建立在由α-螺旋和β-折叠链组成的骨架支架上的,其中氢键供体和受体的数量完全平衡。这些重复的二级结构元件是唯一两种可以同时完全满足氢键和无限延伸而不会遇到空间位阻的构象。因此,蛋白质结构域的基本折叠数量限制在不超过约 10000 种。一旦考虑到排斥相互作用,“挫折”问题在很大程度上得到解决,莱文塔尔悖论也得到解决。将“底线”放在首位:氢键满足可能是蛋白质折叠模型中一个很大程度上被低估的参数。