University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
University of Regina, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Qual Health Res. 2021 Aug;31(10):1786-1800. doi: 10.1177/10497323211008843. Epub 2021 May 3.
Access to medical assistance in dying (MAID) is influenced by legislation, health care providers (HCPs), the number of patient requests, and the patients' locations. This research explored the factors that influenced HCPs' nonparticipation in formal MAID processes and their needs to support this emerging practice area. Using an interpretive description methodology, we interviewed 17 physicians and 18 nurse practitioners who identified as non-participators in formal MAID processes. Nonparticipation was influenced by their (a) previous personal and professional experiences, (b) comfort with death, (c) conceptualization of duty, (d) preferred end-of-life care approaches, (e) faith or spirituality beliefs, (f) self-accountability, (g) consideration of emotional labor, and (h) future emotional impact. They identified a need for clear care pathways and safe passage. Two separate yet overlapping concepts were identified, conscientious objection and nonparticipation MAID, and we discussed options to support the social contract of care between HCPs and patients.
获取医疗协助死亡(MAID)受到立法、医疗保健提供者(HCPs)、患者请求数量和患者所在地的影响。这项研究探讨了影响 HCPs 不参与正式 MAID 程序及其支持这一新兴实践领域的需求的因素。使用解释性描述方法,我们采访了 17 名医生和 18 名护士从业者,他们被认定为不参与正式 MAID 程序的人。不参与的原因包括:(a)他们以前的个人和专业经历;(b)对死亡的舒适程度;(c)责任观念;(d)首选的临终关怀方法;(e)信仰或精神信仰;(f)自我问责;(g)对情绪劳动的考虑;以及(h)未来的情绪影响。他们确定需要明确的护理途径和安全通道。我们确定了两个相互独立但又重叠的概念,即出于良心拒服兵役和不参与 MAID,并讨论了支持 HCPs 和患者之间护理社会契约的选择。