• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种新的基于高分辨率 3D MRI 的主动脉瓣面积测量方法及其与传统电影 MRI 和超声心动图评估主动脉瓣狭窄严重程度的比较。

A New Method for Aortic Valve Planimetry with High-Resolution 3-Dimensional MRI and Its Comparison with Conventional Cine MRI and Echocardiography for Assessing the Severity of Aortic Valvular Stenosis.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Department of Radiology, Daejeon Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea.

出版信息

Korean J Radiol. 2021 Aug;22(8):1266-1278. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2020.1218. Epub 2021 Apr 23.

DOI:10.3348/kjr.2020.1218
PMID:33938648
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8316769/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to compare the aortic valve area (AVA) calculated using fast high-resolution three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance (MR) image acquisition with that of the conventional two-dimensional (2D) cine MR technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We included 139 consecutive patients (mean age ± standard deviation [SD], 68.5 ± 9.4 years) with aortic valvular stenosis (AS) and 21 asymptomatic controls (52.3 ± 14.2 years). High-resolution T2-prepared 3D steady-state free precession (SSFP) images (2.0 mm slice thickness, 10 contiguous slices) for 3D planimetry (3DP) were acquired with a single breath hold during mid-systole. 2D SSFP cine MR images (6.0 mm slice thickness) for 2D planimetry (2DP) were also obtained at three aortic valve levels. The calculations for the effective AVA based on the MR images were compared with the transthoracic echocardiographic (TTE) measurements using the continuity equation.

RESULTS

The mean AVA ± SD derived by 3DP, 2DP, and TTE in the AS group were 0.81 ± 0.26 cm², 0.82 ± 0.34 cm², and 0.80 ± 0.26 cm², respectively ( = 0.366). The intra-observer agreement was higher for 3DP than 2DP in one observer: intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.95 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94-0.97) and 0.87 (95% CI, 0.82-0.91), respectively, for observer 1 and 0.97 (95% CI, 0.96-0.98) and 0.98 (95% CI, 0.97-0.99), respectively, for observer 2. Inter-observer agreement was similar between 3DP and 2DP, with the ICC of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.89-0.94) and 0.91 (95% CI, 0.88-0.93), respectively. 3DP-derived AVA showed a slightly higher agreement with AVA measured by TTE than the 2DP-derived AVA, with the ICC of 0.87 (95% CI, 0.82-0.91) vs. 0.85 (95% CI, 0.79-0.89).

CONCLUSION

High-resolution 3D MR image acquisition, with single-breath-hold SSFP sequences, gave AVA measurement with low observer variability that correlated highly with those obtained by TTE.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较基于快速高分辨率三维(3D)磁共振(MR)图像采集的主动脉瓣口面积(AVA)与传统二维(2D)电影 MR 技术的计算结果。

材料与方法

本研究纳入了 139 例连续的主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)患者(平均年龄±标准差[SD],68.5±9.4 岁)和 21 例无症状对照者(52.3±14.2 岁)。采用单次屏气的快速高分辨率 T2 准备三维稳态自由进动(SSFP)序列(2.0mm 层厚,10 个连续层面)获取 3D 平面测量(3DP)的 3D 图像。在三个主动脉瓣水平处还获取了二维 SSFP 电影 MR 图像(6.0mm 层厚)用于 2D 平面测量(2DP)。使用连续方程比较基于 MR 图像的有效 AVA 计算结果与经胸超声心动图(TTE)测量值。

结果

AS 组中,3DP、2DP 和 TTE 测量的平均 AVA±SD 分别为 0.81±0.26cm²、0.82±0.34cm²和 0.80±0.26cm²(=0.366)。在一位观察者中,3DP 的观察者内一致性高于 2DP:观察者 1 的组内相关系数(ICC)分别为 0.95(95%置信区间[CI],0.94-0.97)和 0.87(95% CI,0.82-0.91),观察者 2 分别为 0.97(95% CI,0.96-0.98)和 0.98(95% CI,0.97-0.99)。3DP 和 2DP 之间的观察者间一致性相似,ICC 分别为 0.92(95% CI,0.89-0.94)和 0.91(95% CI,0.88-0.93)。3DP 衍生的 AVA 与 TTE 测量的 AVA 具有更高的一致性,ICC 为 0.87(95% CI,0.82-0.91),而 2DP 衍生的 AVA 为 0.85(95% CI,0.79-0.89)。

结论

采用单次屏气 SSFP 序列的高分辨率 3D MR 图像采集可获得具有低观察者变异性的 AVA 测量值,与 TTE 获得的结果高度相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19de/8316769/f73a205f3ffe/kjr-22-1266-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19de/8316769/de3f38787119/kjr-22-1266-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19de/8316769/d0e7870af6af/kjr-22-1266-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19de/8316769/5e04e478ea21/kjr-22-1266-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19de/8316769/e7a41f4fcd3b/kjr-22-1266-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19de/8316769/99f17526d3c8/kjr-22-1266-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19de/8316769/50557ba5a4bd/kjr-22-1266-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19de/8316769/8c1cdc182688/kjr-22-1266-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19de/8316769/1159b68a8306/kjr-22-1266-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19de/8316769/f73a205f3ffe/kjr-22-1266-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19de/8316769/de3f38787119/kjr-22-1266-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19de/8316769/d0e7870af6af/kjr-22-1266-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19de/8316769/5e04e478ea21/kjr-22-1266-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19de/8316769/e7a41f4fcd3b/kjr-22-1266-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19de/8316769/99f17526d3c8/kjr-22-1266-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19de/8316769/50557ba5a4bd/kjr-22-1266-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19de/8316769/8c1cdc182688/kjr-22-1266-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19de/8316769/1159b68a8306/kjr-22-1266-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19de/8316769/f73a205f3ffe/kjr-22-1266-g009.jpg

相似文献

1
A New Method for Aortic Valve Planimetry with High-Resolution 3-Dimensional MRI and Its Comparison with Conventional Cine MRI and Echocardiography for Assessing the Severity of Aortic Valvular Stenosis.一种新的基于高分辨率 3D MRI 的主动脉瓣面积测量方法及其与传统电影 MRI 和超声心动图评估主动脉瓣狭窄严重程度的比较。
Korean J Radiol. 2021 Aug;22(8):1266-1278. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2020.1218. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
2
Aortic valve area assessment: multidetector CT compared with cine MR imaging and transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography.主动脉瓣面积评估:多层螺旋CT与电影磁共振成像及经胸和经食管超声心动图的比较
Radiology. 2007 Sep;244(3):745-54. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2443061127. Epub 2007 Jul 13.
3
Quantification of aortic valve area: comparison of different methods of echocardiography with 3-D scan of the excised valve.主动脉瓣口面积的定量评估:超声心动图不同方法与切除瓣的 3-D 扫描的对比。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Feb;37(2):529-538. doi: 10.1007/s10554-020-02035-9. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
4
Assessment of aortic valve area combining echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging.超声心动图联合磁共振成像评估主动脉瓣口面积。
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2012 Mar;98(3):234-42. doi: 10.1590/s0066-782x2012005000017. Epub 2012 Feb 29.
5
Aortic valve stenosis planimetry by means of three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography in the real clinical setting: feasibility, reliability and systematic deviations.在实际临床环境中通过三维经食管超声心动图进行主动脉瓣狭窄面积测量:可行性、可靠性及系统偏差
Echocardiography. 2015 Mar;32(3):508-15. doi: 10.1111/echo.12675. Epub 2014 Jul 5.
6
Evaluation of aortic valve stenosis using cardiovascular magnetic resonance: comparison of an original semiautomated analysis of phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance with Doppler echocardiography.应用心血管磁共振评估主动脉瓣狭窄:相位对比心血管磁共振原始半自动分析与多普勒超声心动图的比较。
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Sep 1;5(5):604-12. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.111.971218. Epub 2012 Jul 13.
7
Comparison of left ventricular outflow geometry and aortic valve area in patients with aortic stenosis by 2-dimensional versus 3-dimensional echocardiography.二维超声心动图与三维超声心动图对主动脉瓣狭窄患者左心室流出道形态及主动脉瓣口面积的比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2012 Jun 1;109(11):1626-31. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.01.391. Epub 2012 Mar 20.
8
Comparison of aortic valve area measured by magnetic resonance imaging and dual-source computed tomography.磁共振成像与双源计算机断层扫描测量主动脉瓣面积的比较。
Acta Radiol. 2009 Jul;50(6):645-51. doi: 10.1080/02841850902902540.
9
Planimetry of the aortic valve orifice area: comparison of multislice spiral computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.主动脉瓣口面积的平面测量:多层螺旋 CT 与磁共振成像的对比。
Eur J Radiol. 2011 Mar;77(3):426-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.08.014. Epub 2009 Sep 23.
10
Planimetric and continuity equation assessment of aortic valve area: Head to head comparison between cardiac magnetic resonance and echocardiography.主动脉瓣面积的平面测量和连续性方程评估:心脏磁共振成像与超声心动图的直接比较
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Dec;26(6):1436-43. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21182.

本文引用的文献

1
Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking in Aortic Stenosis: Exploration of Strain Parameters and Prognostic Value in Asymptomatic Patients with Preserved Ejection Fraction.心脏磁共振特征追踪在主动脉瓣狭窄中的应用:射血分数保留的无症状患者应变参数及其预后价值的探索。
Korean J Radiol. 2020 Mar;21(3):268-279. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2019.0441.
2
Guidelines for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging from the Korean Society of Cardiovascular Imaging-Part 2: Interpretation of Cine, Flow, and Angiography Data.韩国心血管影像学会心血管磁共振成像指南-第 2 部分:电影、流量和血管造影数据的解释。
Korean J Radiol. 2019 Nov;20(11):1477-1490. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2019.0407.
3
Guideline for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging from the Korean Society of Cardiovascular Imaging-Part 1: Standardized Protocol.
韩国心血管影像学会心血管磁共振成像指南-第 1 部分:标准化方案。
Korean J Radiol. 2019 Sep;20(9):1313-1333. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2019.0398.
4
Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of aortic stenosis.用于评估主动脉瓣狭窄的心脏磁共振成像
Heart. 2019 Mar;105(6):489-497. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2018-313003. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
5
Morphological and Functional Evaluation of Quadricuspid Aortic Valves Using Cardiac Computed Tomography.使用心脏计算机断层扫描对四叶式主动脉瓣进行形态学和功能评估。
Korean J Radiol. 2016 Jul-Aug;17(4):463-71. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2016.17.4.463. Epub 2016 Jun 27.
6
Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction as a Mechanism of Angina in Severe AS: Prospective Adenosine-Stress CMR Study.严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者心绞痛的发病机制:前瞻性腺苷负荷心脏磁共振研究。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Mar 29;67(12):1412-1422. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.01.013.
7
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance assessment of the aortic valve stenosis: an in vivo and ex vivo study.主动脉瓣狭窄的心血管磁共振评估:一项体内和体外研究。
BMC Med Imaging. 2015 Aug 26;15:34. doi: 10.1186/s12880-015-0076-x.
8
Comparison of two- and three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography to cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of paravalvular regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后评估瓣周漏的二维和三维经胸超声心动图与心脏磁共振成像的比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2014 Jun 1;113(11):1859-66. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.02.038. Epub 2014 Mar 17.
9
3-T magnetic resonance for determination of aortic valve area: a comparison to echocardiography.用于测定主动脉瓣面积的3-T磁共振成像:与超声心动图的比较
Scand Cardiovasc J. 2014 Jun;48(3):176-83. doi: 10.3109/14017431.2014.906646. Epub 2014 Apr 29.
10
Discrepancies between cardiovascular magnetic resonance and Doppler echocardiography in the measurement of transvalvular gradient in aortic stenosis: the effect of flow vorticity.心血管磁共振与多普勒超声心动图在主动脉瓣狭窄跨瓣梯度测量中的差异:血流涡度的影响。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013 Sep 20;15(1):84. doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-15-84.