J Psychiatr Pract. 2021 May 5;27(3):184-193. doi: 10.1097/PRA.0000000000000550.
Anxiety and depressive disorders frequently recur, but participation in effective psychological interventions to prevent relapse is limited. The reasons for nonparticipation are largely unknown, hampering successful implementation. The aims of this study were: (1) to investigate reasons why patients with remitted anxiety or depressive disorders refuse cognitive-behavioral therapy relapse prevention interventions (RPIs), (2) to compare these reasons with reasons to participate, and (3) to gain insight into patients' preferences regarding relapse prevention.
A qualitative study was conducted in which data were gathered from 52 semistructured interviews with patients who either refused or agreed to participate in psychological relapse prevention. The constant comparative method was used.
The data showed that those who refused to participate (1) did have knowledge about relapse risks in general, (2) but did not relate this risk to themselves, and therefore, did not feel the need for relapse prevention, or (3) declined to participate for logistical reasons or reasons related to the content of the intervention. Preferences concerning the form and content of RPIs were very diverse.
Psychoeducation on relapse should be provided to patients to help them relate recurrence risks to themselves. RPIs should also be individually tailored.
焦虑和抑郁障碍经常复发,但参与有效的心理干预以预防复发的患者有限。不参与的原因在很大程度上是未知的,这阻碍了成功实施。本研究的目的是:(1)调查缓解焦虑或抑郁障碍的患者拒绝认知行为治疗复发预防干预(RPIs)的原因,(2)将这些原因与参与原因进行比较,(3)了解患者对预防复发的偏好。
进行了一项定性研究,对 52 名接受过心理复发预防的患者进行了半结构化访谈,其中包括拒绝或同意参与的患者。使用恒定比较法。
数据显示,那些拒绝参与的患者(1)确实对一般复发风险有一定了解,(2)但并未将这种风险与自己联系起来,因此,他们认为自己没有必要预防复发,或者(3)由于后勤原因或干预内容原因而拒绝参与。对 RPIs 的形式和内容的偏好非常多样化。
应该向患者提供关于复发的心理教育,以帮助他们将复发风险与自身联系起来。RPIs 也应该因人而异。