• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国在对新冠疫情的初期应对期间对呼吸防护设备进行的适合性测试。

Fit-testing of respiratory protective equipment in the UK during the initial response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

作者信息

Green S, Gani A, Bailey M, Brown O, Hing C B

机构信息

St George's University, London, UK.

Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

J Hosp Infect. 2021 Jul;113:180-186. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2021.04.024. Epub 2021 May 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.jhin.2021.04.024
PMID:33940089
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8087583/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Public Health England guidance stipulates the use of filtering facepiece (FFP3) masks for healthcare workers engaged in aerosol-generating procedures. Mask fit-testing of respiratory protective equipment is essential to protect healthcare workers from aerosolized particles.

AIM

To analyse the outcome of mask fit-testing across National Health Service (NHS) hospitals in the UK during the first wave of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.

METHODS

Using the Freedom of Information Act, 137 NHS hospitals were approached on May 26, 2020 by an independent researcher to provide data on the outcome of fit-testing at each site.

FINDINGS

Ninety-six hospitals responded to the request between May 26, 2020 to October 29, 2020. There was a total of 86 mask types used across 56 hospitals, 13 of which were used in at least 10% of these hospitals; the most frequently used was the FFP3M1863, used by 92.86% of hospitals. Overall fit-testing pass rates were provided by 32 hospitals with mean pass rate of 80.74%. The most successful masks, in terms of fit-test failure rates, were the Alpha Solway 3030V and the Alpha Solway S-3V (both reporting mean fit-test failures of 2%). Male- and female-specific pass and failure rates were provided by seven hospitals. Across the seven hospitals, 20.1% of men tested failed the fit-test for all masks used, whereas 19.9% of women tested failed the fit-test for all masks used. Failure rates were significantly higher in staff from Black, Asian, and Minority Ethnic (BAME) backgrounds 644/2507 (25.69%) across four hospitals.

CONCLUSION

Twenty percent of healthcare workers tested during the first response to the pandemic failed fit-testing for masks. A small sample revealed that this was most prominent in staff from BAME backgrounds.

摘要

背景

英国公共卫生部的指导方针规定,从事产生气溶胶操作的医护人员应使用过滤式面罩(FFP3)口罩。对呼吸防护设备进行口罩适合性测试对于保护医护人员免受气溶胶颗粒侵害至关重要。

目的

分析在2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行第一波期间,英国国民保健服务体系(NHS)各医院口罩适合性测试的结果。

方法

2020年5月26日,一名独立研究人员根据《信息自由法》联系了137家NHS医院,要求提供各医院适合性测试的结果数据。

研究结果

96家医院在2020年5月26日至2020年10月29日期间回复了请求。56家医院共使用了86种口罩类型,其中13种在至少10%的这些医院中使用;使用最频繁的是FFP3M1863,92.86%的医院使用该型号。32家医院提供了总体适合性测试通过率,平均通过率为80.74%。就适合性测试失败率而言,最成功的口罩是阿尔法索尔韦3030V和阿尔法索尔韦S-3V(两者报告的平均适合性测试失败率均为2%)。七家医院提供了针对男性和女性的通过和失败率。在这七家医院中,20.1%接受测试的男性对所有使用的口罩适合性测试均未通过,而19.9%接受测试的女性对所有使用的口罩适合性测试均未通过。在四家医院中,来自黑人和少数族裔(BAME)背景的工作人员失败率显著更高,为644/2507(25.69%)。

结论

在对大流行的首次应对期间接受测试的医护人员中,20%的人口罩适合性测试未通过。一个小样本显示,这在来自BAME背景的工作人员中最为突出。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebb4/8087583/8cf62fba3c5b/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebb4/8087583/8cf62fba3c5b/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebb4/8087583/8cf62fba3c5b/gr1_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
Fit-testing of respiratory protective equipment in the UK during the initial response to the COVID-19 pandemic.英国在对新冠疫情的初期应对期间对呼吸防护设备进行的适合性测试。
J Hosp Infect. 2021 Jul;113:180-186. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2021.04.024. Epub 2021 May 1.
2
The role of fit testing N95/FFP2/FFP3 masks: a narrative review.N95/FFP2/FFP3 口罩适合性检验的作用:叙述性综述。
Anaesthesia. 2021 Jan;76(1):91-100. doi: 10.1111/anae.15261. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
3
COVID-19: smoke testing of surgical mask and respirators.COVID-19:手术口罩和呼吸器的烟雾测试。
Occup Med (Lond). 2020 Dec 12;70(8):556-563. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqaa167.
4
Retrospective evaluation of factors affecting successful fit testing of respiratory protective equipment during the early phase of COVID-19.回顾性评价 COVID-19 早期阶段影响呼吸防护设备适配成功测试的因素。
BMJ Open. 2023 May 25;13(5):e065068. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065068.
5
More than half of front-line healthcare workers unknowingly used an N95/P2 mask without adequate airborne protection: An audit in a tertiary institution.超过半数的一线医护人员在不知情的情况下使用了没有足够空气传播防护的 N95/P2 口罩:一家三级医院的审计。
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2021 Sep;49(5):404-411. doi: 10.1177/0310057X211007861. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
6
Fit testing of N95 or P2 masks to protect health care workers.对N95或P2口罩进行适合性测试以保护医护人员。
Med J Aust. 2020 Oct;213(7):293-295.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50764. Epub 2020 Sep 6.
7
Autoclave sterilization and ethanol treatment of re-used surgical masks and N95 respirators during COVID-19: impact on their performance and integrity.在 COVID-19 期间,对重复使用的手术口罩和 N95 呼吸器进行高压灭菌和乙醇处理:对其性能和完整性的影响。
J Hosp Infect. 2020 Aug;105(4):608-614. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2020.06.030. Epub 2020 Jun 27.
8
Reusable snorkel masks adapted as particulate respirators.可重复使用的潜水通气管面罩改装成颗粒物呼吸器。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 5;16(4):e0249201. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249201. eCollection 2021.
9
[Masks as personal protective equipment in the COVID-19 pandemic: How, when and which should be used].[新冠疫情期间作为个人防护装备的口罩:如何使用、何时使用以及应使用哪种口罩]
J Healthc Qual Res. 2020 Jul-Aug;35(4):245-252. doi: 10.1016/j.jhqr.2020.06.001. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
10
Comparison of performance of three different types of respiratory protection devices.三种不同类型呼吸防护装置的性能比较。
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2006 Sep;3(9):465-74. doi: 10.1080/15459620600829211.

引用本文的文献

1
A study to determine the three-dimensional (3D) facial shape characteristics for a successful FFP3 mask fit.一项确定 3D 面部形状特征以实现 FFP3 口罩适配成功的研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 19;14(1):28683. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-80001-4.
2
A review of mask fit testing data associated with protocols utilized in evaluating the efficacy of N95 masks for health care workers.对与用于评估医护人员N95口罩功效的方案相关的口罩适配性测试数据的综述。
J Infect Prev. 2024 Jul 20:17571774241266400. doi: 10.1177/17571774241266400.
3
Striving to be the fittest: quantitative P2/N95 respirator fit test results among hospital staff during the COVID-19 pandemic.

本文引用的文献

1
Microbial contamination of powered air purifying respirators (PAPR) used by healthcare staff during the COVID-19 pandemic: an in situ microbiological study.医护人员在 COVID-19 大流行期间使用的动力送风过滤式呼吸器(PAPR)的微生物污染:现场微生物学研究。
Am J Infect Control. 2021 Jun;49(6):707-712. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2021.02.006. Epub 2021 Feb 13.
2
Use of powered air-purifying respirator(PAPR) as part of protective equipment against SARS-CoV-2-a narrative review and critical appraisal of evidence.在针对 SARS-CoV-2 的防护设备中使用动力送风过滤式呼吸防护器(PAPR)——证据的叙述性回顾和批判性评估。
Am J Infect Control. 2021 Apr;49(4):492-499. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2020.11.009. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
3
努力做到最适配:新冠疫情期间医院工作人员的定量P2/N95呼吸器适配测试结果
Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2023 Dec 15;3(1):e233. doi: 10.1017/ash.2023.503. eCollection 2023.
4
The effect of N95 designs on respirator fit and its associations with gender and facial dimensions.N95 设计对呼吸器贴合度的影响及其与性别和面部尺寸的关系。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 29;18(11):e0288105. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288105. eCollection 2023.
5
A systematic review of passing fit testing of the masks and respirators used during the COVID-19 pandemic: Part 1-quantitative fit test procedures.COVID-19 大流行期间使用的口罩和呼吸器的通过率测试的系统评价:第 1 部分——定量贴合测试程序。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 26;18(10):e0293129. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293129. eCollection 2023.
6
Correlation between use of different type protective facemasks and the oral ecosystem.不同类型防护口罩使用与口腔生态的相关性。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Oct 12;23(1):1992. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16936-6.
7
Retrospective evaluation of factors affecting successful fit testing of respiratory protective equipment during the early phase of COVID-19.回顾性评价 COVID-19 早期阶段影响呼吸防护设备适配成功测试的因素。
BMJ Open. 2023 May 25;13(5):e065068. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065068.
8
Personal protective equipment (PPE) related adverse skin reactions among healthcare workers at the main COVID-19 isolation center in Barbados.巴巴多斯主要 COVID-19 隔离中心医护人员的个人防护装备(PPE)相关不良皮肤反应。
Front Public Health. 2022 Oct 11;10:978590. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.978590. eCollection 2022.
9
Improving the fit of filtering facepiece respirators.改善过滤式面罩呼吸器的贴合度。
Br Dent J. 2022 Aug 5:1-5. doi: 10.1038/s41415-022-4512-3.
10
P2/N95 filtering facepiece respirators: Results of a large-scale quantitative mask fit testing program in Australian health care workers.P2/N95 过滤式面罩呼吸器:澳大利亚医护人员大规模定量口罩适配测试计划的结果。
Am J Infect Control. 2022 May;50(5):509-515. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2021.12.016. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
The impact of ethnicity on clinical outcomes in COVID-19: A systematic review.
种族对新冠病毒病临床结局的影响:一项系统评价
EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Jun 3;23:100404. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100404. eCollection 2020 Jun.
4
Do Various Respirator Models Fit the Workers in the Norwegian Smelting Industry?各种型号的呼吸器适合挪威冶炼行业的工人吗?
Saf Health Work. 2019 Sep;10(3):370-376. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2019.06.004. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
5
Evaluation of a large-scale quantitative respirator-fit testing program for healthcare workers: survey results.大规模医护人员定量型呼吸防护具适配测试计划评估:调查结果。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010 Sep;31(9):918-25. doi: 10.1086/655460.
6
Facial anthropometric differences among gender, ethnicity, and age groups.性别、种族和年龄组之间的面部人体测量差异。
Ann Occup Hyg. 2010 Jun;54(4):391-402. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/meq007. Epub 2010 Mar 10.
7
Fit factors for quarter masks and facial size categories.半面罩的适合因数与面部尺寸类别
Ann Occup Hyg. 2000 May;44(3):227-34.