• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

各种型号的呼吸器适合挪威冶炼行业的工人吗?

Do Various Respirator Models Fit the Workers in the Norwegian Smelting Industry?

作者信息

Foereland Solveig, Robertsen Oeystein, Hegseth Marit Noest

机构信息

Department of Occupational Medicine, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.

Department of Geoscience and Petroleum, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.

出版信息

Saf Health Work. 2019 Sep;10(3):370-376. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2019.06.004. Epub 2019 Jun 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.shaw.2019.06.004
PMID:31497335
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6717833/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Respirator fit testing is a method to assess if the respirator provides an adequate face seal for the worker.

METHODS

Workers from four Norwegian smelters were invited to participate in the study, and 701 respirator fit tests were performed on 127 workers. Fourteen respirator models were included: one FFABE1P3 and 11 FFP3 respirator models produced in one size and two silicone half masks with P3 filters available in three sizes. The workers performed a quantitative fit test according to Health and Safety Executive 282/28 with 5-6 different respirator models, and they rated the respirators based on comfort. Predictors of overall fit factors were explored.

RESULTS

The pass rate for all fit tests was 62%, 56% for women, and 63% for men. The silicone respirators had the highest percentage of passed tests (92-100%). The pass rate for the FFP3 models varied from 19-89%, whereas the FFABE1P3 respirator had a pass rate of 36%. Five workers did not pass with any respirators, and 14 passed with all the respirators tested. Only 63% passed the test with the respirator they normally used. The mean comfort score on the scale from 1 to 5 was 3.2. The respirator model was the strongest predictor of the overall fit factor. The other predictors (age, sex, and comfort score) did not improve the fit of the model.

CONCLUSION

There were large differences in how well the different respirator models fitted the Norwegian smelter workers. The results can be useful when choosing which respirators to include in respirator fit testing programs in similar populations.

摘要

背景

呼吸器适合性测试是一种评估呼吸器是否能为工人提供足够面部密封的方法。

方法

邀请了来自挪威四家冶炼厂的工人参与该研究,对127名工人进行了701次呼吸器适合性测试。共纳入了14种呼吸器型号:一种FFABE1P3和11种FFP3呼吸器型号,均为单一尺寸,以及两种带P3过滤器的硅胶半面罩,有三种尺寸可供选择。工人们根据健康与安全执行局282/28标准,使用5 - 6种不同的呼吸器型号进行了定量适合性测试,并根据舒适度对呼吸器进行了评分。探讨了总体适合因数的预测因素。

结果

所有适合性测试的通过率为62%,女性为56%,男性为63%。硅胶呼吸器的测试通过率最高(92 - 100%)。FFP3型号的通过率在19 - 89%之间,而FFABE1P3呼吸器的通过率为36%。有5名工人使用任何呼吸器都未通过测试,14名工人使用所有测试的呼吸器均通过。只有63%的工人使用其通常使用的呼吸器通过了测试。从1到5的舒适度评分平均为3.2。呼吸器型号是总体适合因数的最强预测因素。其他预测因素(年龄、性别和舒适度评分)并未改善模型的拟合度。

结论

不同呼吸器型号对挪威冶炼厂工人的适配程度存在很大差异。这些结果对于在类似人群中选择纳入呼吸器适合性测试项目的呼吸器时可能会有所帮助。

相似文献

1
Do Various Respirator Models Fit the Workers in the Norwegian Smelting Industry?各种型号的呼吸器适合挪威冶炼行业的工人吗?
Saf Health Work. 2019 Sep;10(3):370-376. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2019.06.004. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
2
N95 respirators: quantitative fit test pass rates and usability and comfort assessment by health care workers.N95 呼吸器:医护人员定量贴合度测试通过率以及可用性和舒适度评估。
Med J Aust. 2022 Jul 18;217(2):88-93. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51585. Epub 2022 May 29.
3
Respiratory protection against Mycobacterium tuberculosis: quantitative fit test outcomes for five type N95 filtering-facepiece respirators.针对结核分枝杆菌的呼吸防护:五种N95型过滤式面罩呼吸器的定量适合性测试结果
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2004 Jan;1(1):22-8. doi: 10.1080/15459620490250026.
4
Fit testing and comfort evaluation of prophylactic dressing use for healthcare workers under N95/P2 respirators in one health service district in Australia.澳大利亚一个卫生服务区内 N95/P2 呼吸器下医护人员使用防护性敷料的适配测试和舒适度评估。
J Hosp Infect. 2022 May;123:100-107. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2022.02.016. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
5
Comparison of qualitative and quantitative fit-testing results for three commonly used respirators in the healthcare sector.医疗保健领域三种常用呼吸器的定性和定量适合性测试结果比较。
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2017 Mar;14(3):175-179. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2016.1237030.
6
Recommended test methods and pass/fail criteria for a respirator fit capability test of half-mask air-purifying respirators.半面罩空气净化呼吸器适配能力测试的推荐测试方法及通过/失败标准。
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2017 Jun;14(6):473-481. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2017.1296233.
7
The role of fit testing N95/FFP2/FFP3 masks: a narrative review.N95/FFP2/FFP3 口罩适合性检验的作用:叙述性综述。
Anaesthesia. 2021 Jan;76(1):91-100. doi: 10.1111/anae.15261. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
8
Fit factor compliance of masks and FFP3 respirators in nurses: A case-control gender study.口罩和 FFP3 呼吸器在护士中的适配因子合规性:一项病例对照性别研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2021 Jul;77(7):3073-3082. doi: 10.1111/jan.14823. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
9
Assessment of respirator fit capability test criteria for full-facepiece air-purifying respirators.全面罩式空气净化呼吸器的呼吸器适合性能力测试标准评估。
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2019 Jul;16(7):489-497. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2019.1609006. Epub 2019 May 20.
10
Quantitative Respirator Fit, Face Sizes, and Determinants of Fit in South African Diagnostic Laboratory Respirator Users.南非诊断实验室口罩使用者的定量呼吸器适配性、脸型大小和适配性决定因素。
Ann Work Expo Health. 2017 Nov 10;61(9):1154-1162. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxx077.

引用本文的文献

1
A review of mask fit testing data associated with protocols utilized in evaluating the efficacy of N95 masks for health care workers.对与用于评估医护人员N95口罩功效的方案相关的口罩适配性测试数据的综述。
J Infect Prev. 2024 Jul 20:17571774241266400. doi: 10.1177/17571774241266400.
2
Development of Korean Representative Headforms for the Total Inward Leakage Testing on Filtering Facepiece Respirators.用于过滤式面罩呼吸器总向内泄漏测试的韩国代表性头模的研制
Saf Health Work. 2024 Mar;15(1):42-52. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2023.11.003. Epub 2023 Nov 7.
3
Facile method for 3D printing conformally onto uneven surfaces and its application to face masks.

本文引用的文献

1
Influence of facial hair length, coarseness, and areal density on seal leakage of a tight-fitting half-face respirator.面部毛发长度、粗糙度和面积密度对紧密贴合的半面罩呼吸器密封泄漏的影响。
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2018 Apr;15(4):334-340. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2017.1416388.
2
Quantitative Respirator Fit, Face Sizes, and Determinants of Fit in South African Diagnostic Laboratory Respirator Users.南非诊断实验室口罩使用者的定量呼吸器适配性、脸型大小和适配性决定因素。
Ann Work Expo Health. 2017 Nov 10;61(9):1154-1162. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxx077.
3
Comparison of qualitative and quantitative fit-testing results for three commonly used respirators in the healthcare sector.
在不平整表面上进行3D共形打印的简便方法及其在口罩中的应用。
Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 8;13(1):21659. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-48547-x.
4
Retrospective evaluation of factors affecting successful fit testing of respiratory protective equipment during the early phase of COVID-19.回顾性评价 COVID-19 早期阶段影响呼吸防护设备适配成功测试的因素。
BMJ Open. 2023 May 25;13(5):e065068. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065068.
5
Viscoelastic Polyurethane Foams with Reduced Flammability and Cytotoxicity.具有降低可燃性和细胞毒性的粘弹性聚氨酯泡沫材料。
Materials (Basel). 2021 Dec 26;15(1):151. doi: 10.3390/ma15010151.
6
P2/N95 filtering facepiece respirators: Results of a large-scale quantitative mask fit testing program in Australian health care workers.P2/N95 过滤式面罩呼吸器:澳大利亚医护人员大规模定量口罩适配测试计划的结果。
Am J Infect Control. 2022 May;50(5):509-515. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2021.12.016. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
7
The influence of gender and ethnicity on facemasks and respiratory protective equipment fit: a systematic review and meta-analysis.性别和种族对面罩和呼吸防护设备贴合度的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Nov;6(11). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005537.
8
A feasible route for the design and manufacture of customised respiratory protection through digital facial capture.通过数字面部捕捉设计和制造定制呼吸防护的可行途径。
Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 2;11(1):21449. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-00341-3.
9
Air seal performance of personalized and statistically shaped 3D-printed face masks compared with market-available surgical and FFP2 masks.个性化和统计形状的 3D 打印口罩与市售手术口罩和 FFP2 口罩的空气密封性能比较。
Sci Rep. 2021 Sep 29;11(1):19347. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-98963-0.
10
Fit-testing of respiratory protective equipment in the UK during the initial response to the COVID-19 pandemic.英国在对新冠疫情的初期应对期间对呼吸防护设备进行的适合性测试。
J Hosp Infect. 2021 Jul;113:180-186. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2021.04.024. Epub 2021 May 1.
医疗保健领域三种常用呼吸器的定性和定量适合性测试结果比较。
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2017 Mar;14(3):175-179. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2016.1237030.
4
Comparison of Three Real-Time Measurement Methods for Airborne Ultrafine Particles in the Silicon Alloy Industry.硅合金行业空气中超细颗粒物三种实时测量方法的比较
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Sep 1;13(9):871. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13090871.
5
Particle Size-Selective Assessment of Protection of European Standard FFP Respirators and Surgical Masks against Particles-Tested with Human Subjects.对欧洲标准 FFP 呼吸器和外科口罩的防护作用进行粒子大小选择性评估 - 经人体测试。
J Healthc Eng. 2016;2016. doi: 10.1155/2016/8572493.
6
Selecting models for a respiratory protection program: what can we learn from the scientific literature?为呼吸防护计划选择模型:我们能从科学文献中学到什么?
Am J Infect Control. 2015 Feb;43(2):127-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2014.10.021. Epub 2014 Dec 10.
7
Fitting characteristics of N95 filtering-facepiece respirators used widely in China.在中国广泛使用的 N95 过滤式面罩呼吸器的拟合特征。
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 21;9(1):e85299. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085299. eCollection 2014.
8
Dust exposure is associated with increased lung function loss among workers in the Norwegian silicon carbide industry.粉尘暴露与挪威碳化硅行业工人的肺功能下降有关。
Occup Environ Med. 2013 Nov;70(11):803-9. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2012-101068. Epub 2013 Jul 12.
9
Respiratory hazards of metal smelting.金属冶炼的呼吸危害。
Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2013 Mar;19(2):158-62. doi: 10.1097/MCP.0b013e32835ceeae.
10
Lung cancer incidence among Norwegian silicon carbide industry workers: associations with particulate exposure factors.挪威碳化硅行业工人肺癌发病率:与颗粒暴露因素的关系。
Occup Environ Med. 2012 Aug;69(8):527-33. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2011-100623. Epub 2012 May 18.