Suppr超能文献

问答法与Kahoot方法强化对护生成绩和动机水平影响的比较:一项准实验性综述。

Comparison of the effect of reinforcement with question-answer and kahoot method on the success and motivation levels of nursing students: A quasi-experimental review.

作者信息

Aras Güzel Nur, Çiftçi Bahar

机构信息

Department of Fundamental of Nursing, Ağrı İbrahim Çeçen University, Ağrı, Turkey.

Department of Fundamental of Nursing, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey.

出版信息

Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Jul;102:104930. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104930. Epub 2021 Apr 24.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to compare the effect of question-answer and Kahoot method reinforcement on nursing students' success and motivation levels.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This quasi-experiment study was carried out with 65 students studying at the nursing department at a state university in Turkey. The research data were obtained between November 2019 and February 2020. The study sample was divided into two groups as question-answer and Kahoot. In the first stage of the research, 8 h of training were given to all 65 students on the subject "Infection Control and Precautions," applying the method of teaching by presentation. Shortly after the training, the Kahoot group was reinforced on the Kahoot platform and the Question-answer group in PowerPoint, using the same questions for 30 min. In the second stage of the study, one day after the training, "Student Information Form" and "Instructional Materials Motivation Scale" were filled out, and "Achievement Test 1" was implemented. In the third stage, "Achievement Test 2" was executed two months after the training to test longer term knowledge retention.

RESULTS

The Kahoot group students had a score of 66.63 ± 11.02 in the "Achievement Test 1" and 67.76 ± 15.62 in the question-answer group. It was determined that the total score average of the students in the Kahoot group "Achievement Test 2" was 51.25 ± 13.42, and the students in the question-answer group were 47.03 ± 12.61. Accordingly, there was no statistically significant difference between the "Achievement Test 1" and "Achievement Test 2" mean scores of the students in the question-answer and Kahoot group (p > 0.05). The total score average of the question-answer group for "Instructional Materials Motivation Scale" was 127.88 ± 13.64, while the Kahoot group was 126.28 ± 16.88. It was determined that there was no statistically significant relationship between the "Achievement Test 1", "Achievement Test 2" and the "Instructional Materials Motivation Scale" total score and sub-dimensions of the students in the Question-Answer group and Kahoot group (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In the study analyzing the effect of reinforcement by the question-answer or Kahoot method on nursing students' success and motivation levels, it was concluded that no method was superior.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较问答法和 Kahoot 法强化对护理专业学生成绩和动机水平的影响。

材料与方法

本准实验研究对土耳其一所国立大学护理系的65名学生进行。研究数据于2019年11月至2020年2月期间收集。研究样本分为问答组和 Kahoot 组。在研究的第一阶段,对所有65名学生就“感染控制与预防”主题进行了8小时的培训,采用演示教学法。培训后不久,Kahoot 组在 Kahoot 平台上进行强化,问答组在 PowerPoint 上进行强化,使用相同的问题,时长30分钟。在研究的第二阶段,培训后一天,填写“学生信息表”和“教学材料动机量表”,并实施“成就测试1”。在第三阶段,培训两个月后进行“成就测试2”,以测试长期知识保持情况。

结果

Kahoot 组学生在“成就测试1”中的得分为66.63±11.02,问答组为67.76±15.62。结果显示,Kahoot 组学生在“成就测试2”中的总分平均分为51.25±13.42,问答组学生为47.03±12.61。因此,问答组和 Kahoot 组学生在“成就测试1”和“成就测试2”的平均得分之间没有统计学上的显著差异(p>0.05)。问答组在“教学材料动机量表”上的总分平均分为127.88±13.64,而 Kahoot 组为126.28±16.88。结果表明,问答组和 Kahoot 组学生在“成就测试1”“成就测试2”与“教学材料动机量表”总分及各维度之间没有统计学上的显著关系(p>0.05)。

结论

在分析问答法或 Kahoot 法强化对护理专业学生成绩和动机水平影响的研究中,得出两种方法均无优势的结论。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验