Zorbas John S, Ho Kwok M, Litton Edward, Wibrow Bradley, Fysh Edward, Anstey Matthew H
Intensive Care Department, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Australia.
Intensive Care Department, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia.
Acute Crit Care. 2021 May;36(2):143-150. doi: 10.4266/acc.2021.00017. Epub 2021 May 4.
Evidence prior to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic suggested that, compared with conventional ventilation strategies, airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) can improve oxygenation and reduce mortality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. We aimed to assess the association between APRV use and clinical outcomes among adult patients receiving mechanical ventilation for COVID-19 and hypothesized that APRV use would be associated with improved survival compared with conventional ventilation.
A total of 25 patients with COVID-19 pneumonitis was admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) for invasive ventilation in Perth, Western Australia, between February and May 2020. Eleven of these patients received APRV. The primary outcome was survival to day 90. Secondary outcomes were ventilation-free survival days to day 90, mechanical complications from ventilation, and number of days ventilated.
Patients who received APRV had a lower probability of survival than did those on other forms of ventilation (hazard ratio, 0.17; 95% confidence interval, 0.03-0.89; P=0.036). This finding was independent of indices of severity of illness to predict the use of APRV. Patients who received APRV also had fewer ventilator-free survival days up to 90 days after initiation of ventilation compared to patients who did not receive APRV, and survivors who received APRV had fewer ventilator-free days than survivors who received other forms of ventilation. There were no differences in mechanical complications according to mode of ventilation.
Based on the findings of this study, we urge caution with the use of APRV in COVID-19.
2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行之前的证据表明,与传统通气策略相比,气道压力释放通气(APRV)可改善急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的氧合并降低死亡率。我们旨在评估接受COVID-19机械通气的成年患者中使用APRV与临床结局之间的关联,并假设与传统通气相比,使用APRV可提高生存率。
2020年2月至5月期间,西澳大利亚州珀斯共有25例COVID-19肺炎患者因有创通气入住重症监护病房(ICU)。其中11例患者接受了APRV。主要结局是存活至第90天。次要结局是至第90天无通气存活天数、通气引起的机械并发症以及通气天数。
接受APRV的患者比接受其他形式通气的患者存活概率更低(风险比,0.17;95%置信区间,0.03-0.89;P=0.036)。这一发现与预测APRV使用的疾病严重程度指标无关。与未接受APRV的患者相比,接受APRV的患者在通气开始后90天内无通气存活天数也更少,接受APRV的幸存者比接受其他形式通气的幸存者无通气天数更少。根据通气模式,机械并发症无差异。
基于本研究结果,我们敦促在COVID-19中谨慎使用APRV。