Suppr超能文献

2019冠状病毒病与中东呼吸综合征合并急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的特征及通气过程比较

Comparison of characteristics and ventilatory course between coronavirus disease 2019 and Middle East respiratory syndrome patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

作者信息

Khalid Imran, Yamani Romaysaa M, Imran Maryam, Akhtar Muhammad Ali, Imran Manahil, Gul Rumaan, Khalid Tabindeh Jabeen, Wali Ghassan Y

机构信息

John D. Dingell VA Medical Center, Detroit, MI, USA.

King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Acute Crit Care. 2021 Aug;36(3):223-231. doi: 10.4266/acc.2021.00388. Epub 2021 Jul 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Both coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) can cause acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS); however, their ARDS course and characteristics have not been compared, which we evaluate in our study.

METHODS

MERS patients with ARDS seen during the 2014 outbreak and COVID-19 patients with ARDS admitted between March and December 2020 in our hospital were included, and their clinical characteristics, ventilatory course, and outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

Forty-nine and 14 patients met the inclusion criteria for ARDS in the COVID-19 and MERS groups, respectively. Both groups had a median of four comorbidities with high Charlson comorbidity index value of 5 points (P>0.22). COVID-19 patients were older, obese, had significantly higher initial C-reactive protein (CRP), more likely to get trial of high-flow oxygen, and had delayed intubation (P≤0.04). The postintubation course was similar between the groups. Patients in both groups experienced a prolonged duration of mechanical ventilation, and majority received paralytics, dialysis, and vasopressor agents (P>0.28). The respiratory and ventilatory parameters after intubation (including tidal volume, fraction of inspired oxygen, peak and plateau pressures) and their progression over 3 weeks were similar (P>0.05). Rates of mortality in the ICU (53% vs. 64%) and hospital (59% vs. 64%) among COVID-19 and MERS patients (P≥0.54) were very high.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite some distinctive differences between COVID-19 and MERS patients prior to intubation, the respiratory and ventilatory parameters postintubation were not different. The higher initial CRP level in COVID-19 patients may explain the steroid responsiveness in this population.

摘要

背景

2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)和中东呼吸综合征(MERS)均可导致急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS);然而,它们的ARDS病程和特征尚未进行比较,我们在本研究中对此进行评估。

方法

纳入2014年疫情期间出现ARDS的MERS患者以及2020年3月至12月在我院住院的COVID-19合并ARDS患者,比较他们的临床特征、通气过程及结局。

结果

COVID-19组和MERS组分别有49例和14例患者符合ARDS纳入标准。两组患者合并症中位数均为4种,查尔森合并症指数较高,均为5分(P>0.22)。COVID-19患者年龄更大、肥胖,初始C反应蛋白(CRP)显著更高,更有可能接受高流量吸氧试验,且插管延迟(P≤0.04)。两组插管后的病程相似。两组患者机械通气时间均延长,大多数接受了镇静剂、透析和血管活性药物治疗(P>0.28)。插管后的呼吸和通气参数(包括潮气量、吸入氧分数、峰压和平台压)及其3周内的变化相似(P>0.05)。COVID-19和MERS患者在重症监护病房(53%对64%)和医院(59%对64%)的死亡率非常高(P≥0.54)。

结论

尽管COVID-19和MERS患者在插管前存在一些明显差异,但插管后的呼吸和通气参数并无不同。COVID-19患者较高的初始CRP水平可能解释了该人群对类固醇的反应性。

相似文献

3
Human and novel coronavirus infections in children: a review.儿童人感染和新型冠状病毒感染:综述。
Paediatr Int Child Health. 2021 Feb;41(1):36-55. doi: 10.1080/20469047.2020.1781356. Epub 2020 Jun 25.

本文引用的文献

3
5
Cytokine Storm.细胞因子风暴
N Engl J Med. 2020 Dec 3;383(23):2255-2273. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra2026131.
8
Identification of risk factors for mortality in COVID-19 patients.新型冠状病毒肺炎患者死亡风险因素的识别
Acute Crit Care. 2020 Nov;35(4):296-297. doi: 10.4266/acc.2020.00850. Epub 2020 Nov 9.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验