Skeletal Biology Research Centre, School of Anthropology and Conservation, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.
Department of Human Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
J Anat. 2021 Aug;239(2):351-373. doi: 10.1111/joa.13437. Epub 2021 May 4.
Morphological variation in the hominoid capitate has been linked to differences in habitual locomotor activity due to its importance in movement and load transfer at the midcarpal joint proximally and carpometacarpal joints distally. Although the shape of bones and their articulations are linked to joint mobility, the internal structure of bones has been shown experimentally to reflect, at least in part, the loading direction and magnitude experienced by the bone. To date, it is uncertain whether locomotor differences among hominoids are reflected in the bone microarchitecture of the capitate. Here, we apply a whole-bone methodology to quantify the cortical and trabecular architecture (separately and combined) of the capitate across bipedal (modern Homo sapiens), knuckle-walking (Pan paniscus, Pan troglodytes, Gorilla sp.), and suspensory (Pongo sp.) hominoids (n = 69). It is hypothesized that variation in bone microarchitecture will differentiate these locomotor groups, reflecting differences in habitual postures and presumed loading force and direction. Additionally, it is hypothesized that trabecular and cortical architecture in the proximal and distal regions, as a result of being part of mechanically divergent joints proximally and distally, will differ across these portions of the capitate. Results indicate that the capitate of knuckle-walking and suspensory hominoids is differentiated from bipedal Homo primarily by significantly thicker distal cortical bone. Knuckle-walking taxa are further differentiated from suspensory and bipedal taxa by more isotropic trabeculae in the proximal capitate. An allometric analysis indicates that size is not a significant determinate of bone variation across hominoids, although sexual dimorphism may influence some parameters within Gorilla. Results suggest that internal trabecular and cortical bone is subjected to different forces and functional adaptation responses across the capitate (and possibly other short bones). Additionally, while separating trabecular and cortical bone is normal protocol of current whole-bone methodologies, this study shows that when applied to carpals, removing or studying the cortical bone separately potentially obfuscates functionally relevant signals in bone structure.
类人猿的头状骨的形态变化与习惯性运动活动的差异有关,这是由于其在近侧腕骨关节和远侧腕掌关节处的运动和负荷传递中的重要性。虽然骨骼的形状及其关节连接与关节活动性有关,但骨骼的内部结构已通过实验证明至少部分反映了骨骼所经历的加载方向和大小。迄今为止,尚不确定类人猿之间的运动差异是否反映在头状骨的骨微观结构中。在这里,我们应用整体骨骼方法对头状骨的皮质和小梁结构(分别和组合)进行定量分析,这些骨骼来自双足行走(现代人类)、指节行走(黑猩猩、大猩猩、猩猩)和悬挂行走(猩猩)的类人猿(n=69)。假设骨微观结构的变化将区分这些运动群体,反映出习惯性姿势和假定的加载力和方向的差异。此外,假设近端和远端的小梁和皮质结构由于是近端和远端机械上不同的关节的一部分,因此在头状骨的这些部分之间会有所不同。结果表明,指节行走和悬挂行走的类人猿的头状骨与双足行走的人类主要通过明显更厚的远端皮质骨来区分。指节行走的类人猿进一步与悬挂行走和双足行走的类人猿区分开来,其近端头状骨的小梁具有更高的各向同性。一种比例分析表明,大小不是类人猿之间骨骼变异的重要决定因素,尽管性二型可能会影响大猩猩中的一些参数。结果表明,内部小梁和皮质骨在头状骨(和可能的其他短骨)上受到不同的力和功能适应反应。此外,虽然分离小梁和皮质骨是当前整体骨骼方法的正常方案,但本研究表明,当应用到手骨时,去除或单独研究皮质骨可能会使骨骼结构中的功能相关信号变得模糊。