School of Health, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.
Department of Forensic Medicine, Monash University, Southbank, VIC 3006, Australia.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 30;18(9):4821. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094821.
Despite high rates of critical incidents (CIs) in working class occupations, there is a significant gap in our understanding of responses to these events. In this study, we aimed to inform a response training module by synthesising the key elements of pre-, during- and post-incident responses to CIs and suicide in the workplace. A rapid review identified studies on responses to CIs or suicide deaths in the workplace published between January 2015 and June 2020. A systematic search of six databases (Medline, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Sociology Collection, Academic Search and Business Search Complete) and grey literature was performed. Studies were excluded if the focus was on non-colleagues. Two reviewers independently conducted record screening, a review of the full text and assessed study quality. The existing evidence was synthesised and interventions were categorised using Haddon's Matrix. Five studies were included, reporting on CIs across a range of workplace settings, including railways, factories, police and military, along with external critical response units. Overall, study quality was assessed as being poor. Most of the evidence focused on the pre-incident and post-incident stage. There is little evidence on responses to CIs in the workplace. Evidence-based education and training is necessary to establish organisational responses to assist with supporting workers exposed to workplace CIs.
尽管在工人阶级职业中发生严重事件(CIs)的比率很高,但我们对这些事件的反应仍存在很大的理解差距。在这项研究中,我们旨在通过综合工作场所 CI 和自杀事件前、期间和事件后的关键反应要素,为响应培训模块提供信息。快速审查确定了 2015 年 1 月至 2020 年 6 月期间发表的关于工作场所 CI 或自杀死亡反应的研究。对六个数据库(Medline、CINAHL、PsycINFO、Sociology Collection、Academic Search 和 Business Search Complete)和灰色文献进行了系统搜索。如果重点是非同事,则排除研究。两名审查员独立进行记录筛选、全文审查和评估研究质量。使用 Haddon 矩阵对现有证据进行综合,并对干预措施进行分类。纳入了五项研究,报告了各种工作场所环境中的 CI,包括铁路、工厂、警察和军队以及外部关键反应部队。总体而言,研究质量评估为较差。大多数证据都集中在事件前和事件后阶段。关于工作场所 CI 反应的证据很少。有必要进行循证教育和培训,以建立组织对 CI 的反应,以帮助支持接触工作场所 CI 的工人。