• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人工和数字接触者追踪对 COVID-19 疫情的影响:基于实际接触数据的研究。

Effect of manual and digital contact tracing on COVID-19 outbreaks: a study on empirical contact data.

机构信息

Aix Marseille Univ., CNRS, CPT, Turing Center for Living Systems, Université de Toulon, Marseille, France.

Tokyo Tech World Research Hub Initiative (WRHI), Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

J R Soc Interface. 2021 May;18(178):20201000. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2020.1000. Epub 2021 May 5.

DOI:10.1098/rsif.2020.1000
PMID:33947224
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8097511/
Abstract

Non-pharmaceutical interventions are crucial to mitigate the COVID-19 pandemic and contain re-emergence phenomena. Targeted measures such as case isolation and contact tracing can alleviate the societal cost of lock-downs by containing the spread where and when it occurs. To assess the relative and combined impact of manual contact tracing (MCT) and digital (app-based) contact tracing, we feed a compartmental model for COVID-19 with high-resolution datasets describing contacts between individuals in several contexts. We show that the benefit (epidemic size reduction) is generically linear in the fraction of contacts recalled during MCT and quadratic in the app adoption, with no threshold effect. The cost (number of quarantines) versus benefit curve has a characteristic parabolic shape, independent of the type of tracing, with a potentially high benefit and low cost if app adoption and MCT efficiency are high enough. Benefits are higher and the cost lower if the epidemic reproductive number is lower, showing the importance of combining tracing with additional mitigation measures. The observed phenomenology is qualitatively robust across datasets and parameters. We moreover obtain analytically similar results on simplified models.

摘要

非药物干预对于减轻 COVID-19 大流行和遏制再次出现的现象至关重要。通过在发生传播的地点和时间进行控制,可以缓解封锁对社会造成的代价。为了评估手动接触者追踪(MCT)和数字(基于应用程序)接触者追踪的相对和综合影响,我们使用描述在几种情况下个体之间接触的高分辨率数据集为 COVID-19 进行了一个隔室模型。我们表明,在 MCT 期间回忆起的接触者的比例对(流行病规模的减少)具有一般性的线性影响,而对应用程序的采用率具有二次影响,没有阈值效应。成本(隔离人数)与收益曲线具有特征性的抛物线形状,与追踪类型无关,如果应用程序的采用率和 MCT 的效率足够高,则具有潜在的高收益和低成本。如果传染病繁殖数较低,则收益更高,成本更低,这表明将追踪与其他缓解措施结合起来的重要性。观察到的现象在数据集中和参数中具有定性的稳健性。我们在简化模型上还获得了类似的分析结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8ab/8097511/170259906ba7/rsif20201000f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8ab/8097511/713672549bfe/rsif20201000f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8ab/8097511/3197f446c706/rsif20201000f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8ab/8097511/084dbd89cbf2/rsif20201000f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8ab/8097511/170259906ba7/rsif20201000f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8ab/8097511/713672549bfe/rsif20201000f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8ab/8097511/3197f446c706/rsif20201000f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8ab/8097511/084dbd89cbf2/rsif20201000f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8ab/8097511/170259906ba7/rsif20201000f04.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of manual and digital contact tracing on COVID-19 outbreaks: a study on empirical contact data.人工和数字接触者追踪对 COVID-19 疫情的影响:基于实际接触数据的研究。
J R Soc Interface. 2021 May;18(178):20201000. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2020.1000. Epub 2021 May 5.
2
Comparative effectiveness of contact tracing interventions in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review.新冠疫情背景下接触者追踪干预措施的效果比较:系统评价。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2023 Mar;38(3):243-266. doi: 10.1007/s10654-023-00963-z. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
3
Digital proximity tracing on empirical contact networks for pandemic control.基于经验接触网络的数字接触追踪在大流行控制中的应用。
Nat Commun. 2021 Mar 12;12(1):1655. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21809-w.
4
Effectiveness of isolation, testing, contact tracing, and physical distancing on reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in different settings: a mathematical modelling study.隔离、检测、接触者追踪和保持社交距离在不同环境下减少 SARS-CoV-2 传播的效果:一项数学建模研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Oct;20(10):1151-1160. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30457-6. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
5
Real-Time Digital Contact Tracing: Development of a System to Control COVID-19 Outbreaks in Nursing Homes and Long-Term Care Facilities.实时数字接触追踪:开发系统以控制养老院和长期护理设施中的 COVID-19 疫情。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Aug 25;6(3):e20828. doi: 10.2196/20828.
6
Individual-Level Evaluation of the Exposure Notification Cascade in the SwissCovid Digital Proximity Tracing App: Observational Study.瑞士新冠数字接触追踪应用程序中暴露通知级联的个体水平评估:观察性研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022 May 19;8(5):e35653. doi: 10.2196/35653.
7
Factors Associated With Using the COVID-19 Mobile Contact-Tracing App Among Individuals Diagnosed With SARS-CoV-2 in Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Observational Study.与在荷兰阿姆斯特丹被诊断患有 SARS-CoV-2 的个体使用 COVID-19 移动接触者追踪应用程序相关的因素:观察性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Aug 24;10(8):e31099. doi: 10.2196/31099.
8
Determining the optimal strategy for reopening schools, the impact of test and trace interventions, and the risk of occurrence of a second COVID-19 epidemic wave in the UK: a modelling study.确定英国学校重新开放的最佳策略、检测和追踪干预措施的影响,以及发生第二波 COVID-19 疫情的风险:一项建模研究。
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020 Nov;4(11):817-827. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(20)30250-9. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
9
Consumer Views on Using Digital Data for COVID-19 Control in the United States.消费者对美国使用数字数据进行新冠疫情控制的看法。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 May 3;4(5):e2110918. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.10918.
10
Universal Shelter-in-Place Versus Advanced Automated Contact Tracing and Targeted Isolation: A Case for 21st-Century Technologies for SARS-CoV-2 and Future Pandemics.普适性就地隔离与先进自动化接触者追踪和针对性隔离:面向 SARS-CoV-2 及未来大流行的 21 世纪技术。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2020 Sep;95(9):1898-1905. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.06.027. Epub 2020 Jun 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Multilayer networks describing urban interactions for building the digital twins of five cities in Spain.用于构建西班牙五个城市数字孪生体的描述城市互动的多层网络。
Sci Data. 2025 Jul 15;12(1):1227. doi: 10.1038/s41597-025-05551-2.
2
Integrating Human Mobility Models with Epidemic Modeling: A Framework for Generating Synthetic Temporal Contact Networks.将人类流动模型与流行病模型相结合:生成合成时间接触网络的框架。
Entropy (Basel). 2025 May 8;27(5):507. doi: 10.3390/e27050507.
3
Predicting digital contact tracing tool adoption during COVID-19 from the perspective of TAM: The role of trust, fear, privacy, anxiety, and social media.

本文引用的文献

1
The effectiveness of backward contact tracing in networks.网络中反向接触追踪的有效性。
Nat Phys. 2021 May;17:652-658. doi: 10.1038/s41567-021-01187-2. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
2
Digital proximity tracing on empirical contact networks for pandemic control.基于经验接触网络的数字接触追踪在大流行控制中的应用。
Nat Commun. 2021 Mar 12;12(1):1655. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21809-w.
3
Anatomy of digital contact tracing: Role of age, transmission setting, adoption, and case detection.数字接触者追踪的解剖:年龄、传播环境、采用率和病例发现的作用。
从技术接受模型的角度预测COVID-19期间数字接触追踪工具的采用:信任、恐惧、隐私、焦虑和社交媒体的作用。
Digit Health. 2025 May 5;11:20552076251336271. doi: 10.1177/20552076251336271. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
4
Preserving friendships in school contacts: An algorithm to construct synthetic temporal networks for epidemic modelling.在学校交往中维系友谊:一种构建用于流行病建模的合成时间网络的算法。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2024 Dec 9;20(12):e1012661. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012661. eCollection 2024 Dec.
5
Effectiveness of probabilistic contact tracing in epidemic containment: The role of superspreaders and transmission path reconstruction.概率性接触者追踪在疫情控制中的有效性:超级传播者的作用和传播路径重建
PNAS Nexus. 2024 Sep 3;3(9):pgae377. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae377. eCollection 2024 Sep.
6
The role of digital tools and emerging devices in COVID-19 contact tracing during the first 18 months of the pandemic: a systematic review.数字工具和新兴设备在大流行头 18 个月 COVID-19 接触者追踪中的作用:系统评价。
Eur J Public Health. 2024 Jul 1;34(Supplement_1):i11-i28. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckae039.
7
Effects of User Experience in Automated Information Processing on Perceived Usefulness of Digital Contact-Tracing Apps: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.自动化信息处理中的用户体验对数字接触追踪应用程序感知有用性的影响:横断面调查研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Jun 25;11:e53940. doi: 10.2196/53940.
8
Mobility census for monitoring rapid urban development.流动人口普查,用于监测快速的城市发展。
J R Soc Interface. 2024 May;21(214):20230495. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2023.0495. Epub 2024 May 8.
9
Evaluating completion rates of COVID-19 contact tracing surveys in New York City.评估纽约市 COVID-19 接触者追踪调查的完成率。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Feb 9;24(1):414. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-17920-4.
10
Characterizing the role of human behavior in the effectiveness of contact-tracing applications.描述人类行为在接触者追踪应用程序有效性中的作用。
Front Public Health. 2023 Nov 3;11:1266989. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1266989. eCollection 2023.
Sci Adv. 2021 Apr 9;7(15). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abd8750. Print 2021 Apr.
4
Time to evaluate COVID-19 contact-tracing apps.评估新冠病毒接触者追踪应用程序的时机到了。
Nat Med. 2021 Mar;27(3):361-362. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01236-6.
5
Bidirectional contact tracing could dramatically improve COVID-19 control.双向接触者追踪可显著改善 COVID-19 控制效果。
Nat Commun. 2021 Jan 11;12(1):232. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20325-7.
6
Early evidence of effectiveness of digital contact tracing for SARS-CoV-2 in Switzerland.瑞士数字接触者追踪在 SARS-CoV-2 防控中的早期有效性证据。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2020 Dec 16;150:w20457. doi: 10.4414/smw.2020.20457. eCollection 2020 Dec 14.
7
Epidemiological Parameters of COVID-19: Case Series Study.新型冠状病毒肺炎的流行病学参数:病例系列研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 12;22(10):e19994. doi: 10.2196/19994.
8
Impact of lockdown on COVID-19 epidemic in Île-de-France and possible exit strategies.封锁对法兰西岛 COVID-19 疫情的影响及可能的退出策略。
BMC Med. 2020 Jul 30;18(1):240. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01698-4.
9
Authors' response: Estimating the generation interval for COVID-19 based on symptom onset data.作者回应:基于症状出现数据估算新冠病毒病的代间距。
Euro Surveill. 2020 Jul;25(29). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.29.2001269.
10
Impact of delays on effectiveness of contact tracing strategies for COVID-19: a modelling study.新冠病毒接触者追踪策略有效性延迟的影响:建模研究。
Lancet Public Health. 2020 Aug;5(8):e452-e459. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30157-2. Epub 2020 Jul 16.