Suppr超能文献

新型冠状病毒肺炎的唾液检测:唾液检测结果呈阳性后的血清学检测评估

Salivary testing of COVID-19: evaluation of serological testing following positive salivary results.

作者信息

Caulley Lisa, Shaw Julie, Corsten Martin, Hua Nadia, Angel Jonathan B, Poliquin Guillaume, Whelan Jonathan, Antonation Kym, Johnson-Obaseki Stephanie

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Ottawa, 501 Smyth Rd, Ottawa, K1H8L1, Canada.

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Ottawa, 451 Smyth Road, Ottawa, K1H8L1, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Infect Dis. 2021 May 4;21(1):410. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06108-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Salivary detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has been proposed as an alternative to nasopharyngeal or oropharyngeal swab testing. Our group previously published a study demonstrating that both testing methods identified SARS-CoV-2 using polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based detection methodology. We therefore conducted a follow-up study using antibody testing to evaluate the accuracy of saliva versus swabs for COVID-19 detection and the durability of antibody response.

METHODS

Venous blood samples were collected from consenting participants and the presence of serum antibodies for SARS-CoV-2 was evaluated on a large, automated immunoassay platform by the Roche anti-SARS-CoV-2 qualitative assay (Roche Diagnostics, Laval Quebec). Individuals with a serum antibody cut-off index (COI) ≥ 1.0 were considered positive.

RESULTS

In asymptomatic and mildly symptomatic patients with a previously positive standard swab and/or saliva SARS-CoV-2 PCR-test, 42 demonstrated antibodies with 13 patients positive by swab alone, and 8 patients positive by saliva alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite their status as 'current standard' for COVID-19 testing, these findings highlight limitations of PCR-based tests.

摘要

背景

唾液检测严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)已被提议作为鼻咽或口咽拭子检测的替代方法。我们小组之前发表了一项研究,证明两种检测方法都使用基于聚合酶链反应(PCR)的检测方法来识别SARS-CoV-2。因此,我们进行了一项后续研究,使用抗体检测来评估唾液与拭子在检测新冠病毒疾病(COVID-19)方面的准确性以及抗体反应的持久性。

方法

从同意参与的受试者中采集静脉血样本,并通过罗氏抗SARS-CoV-2定性检测(罗氏诊断公司,魁北克省拉瓦尔)在一个大型自动化免疫分析平台上评估SARS-CoV-2血清抗体的存在情况。血清抗体临界指数(COI)≥1.0的个体被视为阳性。

结果

在之前标准拭子和/或唾液SARS-CoV-2 PCR检测呈阳性的无症状和轻度症状患者中,42例显示有抗体,其中13例仅拭子检测呈阳性,8例仅唾液检测呈阳性。

结论

尽管这些检测方法是COVID-19检测的“现行标准”,但这些发现凸显了基于PCR检测的局限性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8dfd/8094455/c886d2557fad/12879_2021_6108_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验