Suppr超能文献

美国育龄妇女中自我管理堕胎的流行率。

Prevalence of Self-Managed Abortion Among Women of Reproductive Age in the United States.

机构信息

Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health, Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco.

Department of Population and Family Health, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Dec 1;3(12):e2029245. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.29245.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Increasing evidence indicates that people are attempting their own abortions outside the formal health care system. However, population-based estimates of experience with self-managed abortion (SMA) are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the prevalence of SMA attempts among the general US population.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional survey study was fielded August 2 to 17, 2017 among English- and Spanish- speaking, self-identified female panel members from the GfK web-based KnowledgePanel. Women ages 18 to 49 years were approached to complete a 1-time survey. Data were analyzed from September 22, 2017, to March 26, 2020.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

SMA was defined as "some women may do something on their own to try to end a pregnancy without medical assistance. For example, they may get information from the internet, a friend, or family member about pills, medicine, or herbs they can take on their own, or they may do something else to try to end the pregnancy." SMA was assessed using the question, "Have you ever taken or used something on your own, without medical assistance, to try to end an unwanted pregnancy?" Participants reporting SMA were asked about methods used, reasons, and outcomes. Factors associated with SMA experience, including age, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, nativity, reproductive health history, and geography, were assessed. Projected lifetime SMA prevalence was estimated using discrete-time event history models, adjusting for abortion underreporting.

RESULTS

Among 14 151 participants invited to participate, 7022 women (49.6%) (mean [SE] age, 33.9 [9.0] years) agreed to participate. Among these, 57.4% (95% CI, 55.8%-59.0%) were non-Hispanic White, 20.2% (95% CI, 18.9%-21.5%) were Hispanic, and 13.3% (95% CI, 12.1%-14.5%) were non-Hispanic Black; and 15.1% (95% CI, 14.1%-16.3%) reported living at less than 100% federal poverty level (FPL). A total of 1.4% (95% CI, 1.0%-1.8%) of participants reported a history of attempting SMA while in the US. Projected lifetime prevalence of SMA adjusting for underreporting of abortion was 7.0% (95% CI, 5.5%-8.4%). In bivariable analyses, non-Hispanic Black (prevalence ratio [PR], 3.16; 95% CI, 1.48-6.75) and Hispanic women surveyed in English (PR, 3.74; 95% CI, 1.78-7.87) were more likely than non-Hispanic White women to have attempted SMA. Women living below 100% of the FPL were also more likely to have attempted SMA compared with those at 200% FPL or greater (PR, 3.43; 95% CI, 1.83-6.42). At most recent SMA attempt, 20.0% (95% CI, 10.9%-33.8%) of respondents used misoprostol, 29.2% (95% CI, 17.5%-44.5%) used another medication or drug, 38.4% (95% CI, 25.3%-53.4%) used herbs, and 19.8% (95% CI, 10.0%-35.5%) used physical methods. The most common reasons for SMA included that it seemed faster or easier (47.2% [95% CI, 33.0%-61.8%]) and the clinic was too expensive (25.2% [95% CI, 15.7%-37.7%]). Of all attempts, 27.8% (95% CI, 16.6%-42.7%) of respondents reported they were successful; the remainder reported they had subsequent facility-based abortions (33.6% [95% CI, 21.0%-49.0%]), continued the pregnancy (13.4% [95% CI, 7.4%-23.1%]), had a miscarriage (11.4% [95% CI, 4.2%-27.5%]), or were unsure (13.3% [95% CI, 6.8%-24.7%]). A total of 11.0% (95% CI, 5.5%-21.0%) of respondents reported a complication.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This cross-sectional study found that approximately 7% of US women reported having attempted SMA in their lifetime, commonly with ineffective methods. These findings suggest that surveys of SMA experience among patients at abortion clinics may capture only one-third of SMA attempts. People's reasons for attempting SMA indicate that as abortion becomes more restricted, SMA may become more common.

摘要

重要性

越来越多的证据表明,人们正在非正式的医疗体系之外自行进行堕胎。然而,目前缺乏关于自行管理堕胎(SMA)经验的基于人群的估计。

目的

估计美国普通人群中 SMA 尝试的流行率。

设计、地点和参与者:本横断面调查研究于 2017 年 8 月 2 日至 17 日在 GfK 基于网络的知识面板中进行,对象为讲英语和西班牙语的、自认为是女性的面板成员。年龄在 18 至 49 岁之间的女性被邀请完成一次性调查。数据于 2020 年 3 月 26 日从 2017 年 9 月 22 日分析。

主要结果和措施

SMA 被定义为“有些女性可能会自行采取一些措施试图终止妊娠而无需医疗协助。例如,她们可能会从互联网、朋友或家人那里获得关于可以自行服用的药物、药物或草药的信息,或者她们可能会采取其他措施试图终止妊娠。”SMA 通过以下问题进行评估:“您是否曾经自行服用或使用过一些药物,而无需医疗协助,试图终止意外怀孕?”报告有 SMA 经历的参与者被问到使用的方法、原因和结果。与 SMA 经历相关的因素,包括年龄、种族/族裔、社会经济地位、出生地、生殖健康史和地理位置,进行了评估。使用离散时间事件历史模型估计 SMA 的终生流行率,同时调整了堕胎报告不足的影响。

结果

在邀请参加的 14151 名参与者中,7022 名女性(49.6%)(平均[SE]年龄,33.9[9.0]岁)同意参加。其中,57.4%(95%CI,55.8%-59.0%)是非西班牙裔白人,20.2%(95%CI,18.9%-21.5%)是西班牙裔,13.3%(95%CI,12.1%-14.5%)是非西班牙裔黑人;15.1%(95%CI,14.1%-16.3%)报告生活在低于联邦贫困线(FPL)的 100%以下。共有 1.4%(95%CI,1.0%-1.8%)的参与者报告在美国有过试图自行堕胎的经历。调整堕胎报告不足影响后的 SMA 终生流行率预测值为 7.0%(95%CI,5.5%-8.4%)。在单变量分析中,非西班牙裔黑人(患病率比[PR],3.16;95%CI,1.48-6.75)和以英语接受调查的西班牙裔女性(PR,3.74;95%CI,1.78-7.87)比非西班牙裔白人女性更有可能尝试 SMA。生活在 FPL 以下 100%的女性也比 FPL 为 200%或更高的女性更有可能尝试 SMA(PR,3.43;95%CI,1.83-6.42)。在最近一次 SMA 尝试中,20.0%(95%CI,10.9%-33.8%)的受访者使用了米索前列醇,29.2%(95%CI,17.5%-44.5%)使用了其他药物或药物,38.4%(95%CI,25.3%-53.4%)使用了草药,19.8%(95%CI,10.0%-35.5%)使用了物理方法。SMA 的最常见原因包括感觉它更快或更容易(47.2%[95%CI,33.0%-61.8%])和诊所太贵(25.2%[95%CI,15.7%-37.7%])。在所有尝试中,27.8%(95%CI,16.6%-42.7%)的受访者报告他们成功了;其余报告他们随后在医疗机构进行了堕胎(33.6%[95%CI,21.0%-49.0%])、继续怀孕(13.4%[95%CI,7.4%-23.1%])、流产(11.4%[95%CI,4.2%-27.5%])或不确定(13.3%[95%CI,6.8%-24.7%])。共有 11.0%(95%CI,5.5%-21.0%)的受访者报告有并发症。

结论和相关性

这项横断面研究发现,大约 7%的美国女性报告在其一生中曾尝试过 SMA,通常使用无效方法。这些发现表明,在堕胎诊所对患者进行的 SMA 经验调查可能只捕捉到三分之一的 SMA 尝试。人们尝试 SMA 的原因表明,随着堕胎变得更加受限,SMA 可能会变得更加普遍。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

9
Women's Health: Population Patterns and Social Determinants.女性健康:人口模式与社会决定因素
Annu Rev Sociol. 2022 Jul;48:277-298. doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-030320-034200. Epub 2022 May 13.

本文引用的文献

3
Self-managed abortion: A systematic scoping review. 自我管理的堕胎:系统范围界定综述。
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Feb;63:87-110. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2019.08.002. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
4
Self-managed abortion. 自行堕胎。
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Dec;31(6):435-440. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000585.
8
Predicted changes in abortion access and incidence in a post-Roe world.罗诉韦德案被推翻后堕胎可及性和发生率的预测变化。
Contraception. 2019 Nov;100(5):367-373. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.07.139. Epub 2019 Jul 31.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验