LBJ School of Public Affairs, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
Population Research Center, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Aug;223(2):238.e1-238.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.02.026. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
A rapid increase in restrictive abortion legislation in the United States has sparked renewed interest in self-managed abortion as a response to clinic access barriers. Yet little is known about knowledge of, interest in, and experiences of self-managed medication abortion among patients who obtain abortion care in a clinic.
We examined patients' knowledge of, interest in, and experience with self-managed medication abortion before presenting to the clinic. We characterized the clinic- and person-level factors associated with these measures. Finally, we examined the reasons why patients express an interest in or consider self-management before attending the clinic.
We surveyed 1502 abortion patients at 3 Texas clinics in McAllen, San Antonio, and Fort Worth. All individuals seeking abortion care who could complete the survey in English or Spanish were invited to participate in an anonymous survey conducted using iPads. The overall response rate was 90%. We examined the prevalence of 4 outcome variables, both overall and separately by site: (1) knowledge of self-managed medication abortion; (2) having considered self-managing using medications before attending the clinic; (3) interest in medication self-management as an alternative to accessing care at the clinic; and (4) having sought or tried any method of self-management before attending the clinic. We used binary logistic regression models to explore the clinic- and patient-level factors associated with these outcome variables. Finally, we analyzed the reasons reported by those who had considered medication self-management before attending the clinic, as well as the reasons reported by those who would be interested in medication self-management as an alternative to in-clinic care.
Among all respondents, 30% knew about abortion medications available outside the clinic setting (37% in Fort Worth, 33% in McAllen, 19% in San Antonio, P < .001), and among those with prior knowledge, 28% had considered using this option before coming to the clinic (36% in McAllen, 25% in Fort Worth, 21% in San Antonio, P = .028). Among those without prior knowledge of self-management, 39% expressed interest in this option instead of coming to the clinic (54% in San Antonio, 30% in McAllen, 29% in Fort Worth, P < .001). Overall, 13% had sought out or tried any method of self-management before presenting to the clinic (16% in McAllen and 15% in Fort Worth vs 9% in San Antonio, P < .001). Experiencing barriers to clinic access was associated with having considered medication self-management (odds ratio, 2.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.7-3.0) and with seeking or trying any method of self-management before attending the clinic (odds ratio, 1.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-2.7). Difficulty affording the cost of in-clinic care was the most commonly cited reason for having considering medication self-management before attending the clinic. Reasons for interest in medication self-management as an alternative to clinic care included both access barriers and preferences for the privacy and comfort of home.
Considering or attempting self-managed abortion may be part of the pathway to seeking in-clinic care, particularly among those experiencing access barriers. However, considerable interest in medication self-management as an alternative to the clinic also suggests a demand for more autonomous abortion care options.
美国限制堕胎立法的迅速增加引发了人们对自我管理堕胎的重新关注,以应对诊所准入障碍。然而,人们对在诊所获得堕胎护理的患者对自我管理药物流产的了解、兴趣和经验知之甚少。
我们研究了患者在就诊前对自我管理药物流产的了解、兴趣和经验。我们描述了与这些措施相关的诊所和患者层面的因素。最后,我们研究了为什么患者在就诊前表达了对自我管理的兴趣或考虑。
我们在德克萨斯州的麦卡伦、圣安东尼奥和沃思堡的 3 家诊所调查了 1502 名堕胎患者。所有能够用英语或西班牙语完成调查的寻求堕胎护理的人都被邀请参加使用 iPad 进行的匿名调查。总响应率为 90%。我们分别检查了以下 4 个结果变量的总体患病率,以及按地点的患病率:(1)对自我管理药物流产的了解;(2)在就诊前曾考虑过使用药物进行自我管理;(3)对作为替代诊所护理的药物自我管理的兴趣;(4)在就诊前曾寻求或尝试过任何自我管理方法。我们使用二元逻辑回归模型来探讨与这些结果变量相关的诊所和患者层面的因素。最后,我们分析了那些在就诊前曾考虑过药物自我管理的人的报告原因,以及那些对作为替代诊所护理的药物自我管理感兴趣的人的报告原因。
在所有受访者中,有 30%的人了解诊所外可获得的堕胎药物(沃思堡 37%,麦卡伦 33%,圣安东尼奥 19%,P<0.001),在有先验知识的人中,有 28%的人曾考虑过在来诊所之前使用这种选择(麦卡伦 36%,沃思堡 25%,圣安东尼奥 21%,P=0.028)。在没有自我管理先验知识的人中,有 39%的人对这种选择而不是来诊所感兴趣(圣安东尼奥 54%,麦卡伦 30%,沃思堡 29%,P<0.001)。总体而言,有 13%的人在就诊前曾寻求或尝试过任何自我管理方法(麦卡伦和沃思堡各 16%,圣安东尼奥 9%,P<0.001)。诊所准入障碍与考虑药物自我管理(优势比,2.2;95%置信区间,1.7-3.0)以及在就诊前寻求或尝试任何自我管理方法(优势比,1.9;95%置信区间,1.3-2.7)相关。难以负担诊所护理的费用是就诊前考虑药物自我管理的最常见原因。对作为替代诊所护理的药物自我管理感兴趣的原因包括准入障碍和对家庭隐私和舒适的偏好。
考虑或尝试自我管理堕胎可能是寻求诊所护理的途径之一,尤其是在面临准入障碍的人群中。然而,对药物自我管理作为诊所护理替代方案的极大兴趣也表明需要更多的自主堕胎护理选择。