• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Practising shared decision making in primary care.在初级医疗保健中践行共同决策。
Malays Fam Physician. 2021 Mar 22;16(1):2-7. doi: 10.51866/cm0001. eCollection 2021 Mar 25.
2
Achieving involvement: process outcomes from a cluster randomized trial of shared decision making skill development and use of risk communication aids in general practice.实现参与:一项关于全科医疗中共同决策技能培养及风险沟通辅助工具使用的整群随机试验的过程结果
Fam Pract. 2004 Aug;21(4):337-46. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmh401.
3
Shared decision-making in Canada: update, challenges and where next!加拿大的共同决策:最新情况、挑战及未来走向!
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2007;101(4):213-21. doi: 10.1016/j.zgesun.2007.02.024.
4
Exploring doctor and patient views about risk communication and shared decision-making in the consultation.探索医患双方对于会诊中风险沟通和共同决策的看法。
Health Expect. 2003 Sep;6(3):198-207. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2003.00235.x.
5
The long way of implementing patient-centered care and shared decision making in Germany.在德国实施以患者为中心的护理和共同决策的漫长道路。
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2017 Jun;123-124:46-51. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2017.05.006. Epub 2017 May 22.
6
Patient-based outcome results from a cluster randomized trial of shared decision making skill development and use of risk communication aids in general practice.基于患者的结局,来自一项在全科医疗中开展的关于共同决策技能培养及风险沟通辅助工具使用的整群随机试验。
Fam Pract. 2004 Aug;21(4):347-54. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmh402.
7
Navigating the unknown: shared decision-making in the face of uncertainty.探索未知:面对不确定性时的共同决策。
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 May;30(5):675-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-3074-8.
8
The state of shared decision making in Malaysia.马来西亚的共同决策状态。
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2017 Jun;123-124:66-68. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2017.05.019. Epub 2017 May 18.
9
Milestones, barriers and beacons: Shared decision making in Canada inches ahead.里程碑、障碍与指引:加拿大的共同决策正逐步推进。
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2017 Jun;123-124:23-27. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2017.05.020. Epub 2017 May 20.
10
Shared decision making, physicians' explanations, and treatment satisfaction: a cross-sectional survey of prostate cancer patients.共同决策、医生的解释与治疗满意度:一项针对前列腺癌患者的横断面调查。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Dec 14;20(1):334. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01355-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient satisfaction and its associated factors in selected primary healthcare facilities in Kono District, Sierra Leone: a cross-sectional study.塞拉利昂科诺区部分初级医疗保健机构的患者满意度及其相关因素:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 28;15(4):e093501. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093501.
2
Challenges and barriers to physician decision-making for prescribing and deprescribing among patients with multimorbidity in eastern China's primary care settings: a qualitative study.中国东部基层医疗环境中患有多种疾病的患者在药物处方及减药方面医生决策面临的挑战与障碍:一项定性研究
BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 8;15(2):e095063. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095063.
3
Facilitating Implementation of Shared Decision-Making in Medical Schools by Overcoming the Prevailing Challenges: A Brief Review.通过克服普遍存在的挑战促进医学院校共同决策的实施:简要综述
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Jul;16(Suppl 3):S1907-S1909. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1275_23. Epub 2024 Mar 5.
4
Training Undergraduate Medical Students in Shared Decision Making: A Systematic Review.本科医学生共同决策培训:一项系统评价
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Apr;16(Suppl 2):S1033-S1037. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1231_23. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
5
Shared Decision-Making Training in Family Medicine Residency: A Scoping Review.家庭医学住院医师共同决策培训:一项范围综述
Korean J Fam Med. 2024 May;45(3):134-143. doi: 10.4082/kjfm.23.0273. Epub 2024 May 20.
6
The management of acne vulgaris in young people in primary care: A retrospective cohort study.初级保健中青少年寻常痤疮的管理:一项回顾性队列研究。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Mar 20;10:1152391. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1152391. eCollection 2023.
7
Knowledge, attitude and practice on screening and early diagnosis of prostate cancer of primary health care providers in the Free State.南非自由州初级卫生保健提供者对前列腺癌筛查和早期诊断的知识、态度和实践。
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2023 Feb 28;15(1):e1-e12. doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v15i1.3688.
8
Knowledge, beliefs and intentions of African men in the Free State about prostate cancer screening.自由邦地区非洲男性对前列腺癌筛查的认知、信念及意愿
Health SA. 2022 Dec 5;27:2081. doi: 10.4102/hsag.v27i0.2081. eCollection 2022.
9
Shared decision-making in Malaysia: Legislation, patient involvement, implementation and the impact of COVID-19.马来西亚的共享决策:立法、患者参与、实施情况以及 COVID-19 的影响。
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2022 Jun;171:89-92. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2022.04.020. Epub 2022 May 21.

本文引用的文献

1
What will make patients use a patient decision aid? A qualitative study on patients' perspectives on implementation barriers and facilitators.什么会促使患者使用患者决策辅助工具?一项关于患者对实施障碍和促进因素看法的定性研究。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2020 Jun;26(3):755-764. doi: 10.1111/jep.13161. Epub 2019 May 21.
2
Cultural adaptation and validation of patient decision aids: a scoping review.患者决策辅助工具的文化适应与验证:一项范围综述
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018 Mar 2;12:321-332. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S151833. eCollection 2018.
3
International variations in primary care physician consultation time: a systematic review of 67 countries.初级保健医生会诊时间的国际差异:对67个国家的系统评价
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 8;7(10):e017902. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017902.
4
A Simple Approach to Shared Decision Making in Cancer Screening.癌症筛查中共同决策的一种简单方法。
Fam Pract Manag. 2017 May/Jun;24(3):5-10.
5
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临医疗治疗或筛查决策的人们提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 12;4(4):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub5.
6
Factors influencing implementation of a patient decision aid in a developing country: an exploratory study.影响发展中国家患者决策辅助工具实施的因素:一项探索性研究。
Implement Sci. 2017 Mar 21;12(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0569-9.
7
Presenting Numeric Information with Percentages and Descriptive Risk Labels: A Randomized Trial.使用百分比和描述性风险标签呈现数值信息:一项随机试验。
Med Decis Making. 2015 Nov;35(8):937-47. doi: 10.1177/0272989X15584922. Epub 2015 May 7.
8
Evidence-based risk communication: a systematic review.循证风险沟通:系统评价。
Ann Intern Med. 2014 Aug 19;161(4):270-80. doi: 10.7326/M14-0295.
9
An overview of patient involvement in healthcare decision-making: a situational analysis of the Malaysian context.患者参与医疗决策:马来西亚情境分析概述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Oct 11;13:408. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-408.
10
Toward Minimum Standards for Certifying Patient Decision Aids: A Modified Delphi Consensus Process.迈向患者决策辅助工具认证的最低标准:一种改进的德尔菲共识过程。
Med Decis Making. 2014 Aug;34(6):699-710. doi: 10.1177/0272989X13501721. Epub 2013 Aug 20.

在初级医疗保健中践行共同决策。

Practising shared decision making in primary care.

作者信息

Ng Chirk Jenn, Lee Ping Yein

机构信息

MBBS, MMed Family Med, PhD, Department of Primary Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Email:

MBBS, MMed Family Med, Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia.

出版信息

Malays Fam Physician. 2021 Mar 22;16(1):2-7. doi: 10.51866/cm0001. eCollection 2021 Mar 25.

DOI:10.51866/cm0001
PMID:33948136
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8088742/
Abstract

Making healthcare decisions collaboratively between patients and doctors can be challenging in primary care, as clinical encounters are often short. Conflicts between patients and doctors during the decision-making process may affect both patient and doctor satisfaction and result in medico-legal consequences. With the increasing recognition of the importance of patient empowerment, shared decision making (SDM) can serve as a practical consultation model for primary care doctors (PCDs) to guide patients in making informed healthcare choices. Although more research is needed to find effective ways to implement SDM in the real world, the 6-step approach presented in this paper can guide PCDs to practise SDM in their daily practice. Implementation of SDM can be further enhanced by incorporating SDM training into undergraduate and postgraduate curricula and using evidence-based tools such as patient decision aids.

摘要

在初级医疗保健中,患者与医生共同做出医疗决策可能具有挑战性,因为临床诊疗时间通常较短。在决策过程中,患者与医生之间的冲突可能会影响患者和医生双方的满意度,并导致医疗法律后果。随着对患者赋权重要性的认识不断提高,共同决策(SDM)可以作为一种实用的咨询模式,供初级医疗保健医生(PCD)指导患者做出明智的医疗选择。尽管需要更多研究来找到在现实世界中有效实施SDM的方法,但本文介绍的六步方法可以指导PCD在日常实践中践行SDM。将SDM培训纳入本科和研究生课程,并使用患者决策辅助工具等循证工具,可以进一步加强SDM的实施。