• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

研究中的可重复性研讨会。

Workshop on reproducibility in research.

作者信息

Kalichman Michael, Mills Paul J

机构信息

Research Ethics Program, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.

Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Transl Sci. 2020 Jun 19;4(6):562-564. doi: 10.1017/cts.2020.496.

DOI:10.1017/cts.2020.496
PMID:33948232
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8057479/
Abstract

In recent years, concern about research reproducibility has increased dramatically for scientists, funders of research, and the general public. With a view to explicitly address what is often called a reproducibility crisis and putting the focus on research being done by individual trainees, a two-hour workshop was developed and introduced into six courses at UC San Diego. Participation in the workshop resulted in a statistically significant increase in the number of different types of strategies identified by the trainees for fostering reproducibility. The findings are consistent with having increased awareness of strategies to promote reproducibility.

摘要

近年来,科学家、研究资助者和普通公众对研究可重复性的关注急剧增加。为了明确应对通常所说的可重复性危机,并将重点放在个体受训人员所做的研究上,我们开发了一个两小时的研讨会,并将其引入了加州大学圣地亚哥分校的六门课程中。参与该研讨会使得受训人员识别出的用于促进可重复性的不同类型策略的数量在统计上有显著增加。这些发现与提高了对促进可重复性策略的认识是一致的。

相似文献

1
Workshop on reproducibility in research.研究中的可重复性研讨会。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2020 Jun 19;4(6):562-564. doi: 10.1017/cts.2020.496.
2
Effective Practices in the Delivery of Research Ethics Education: A Qualitative Review of Instructional Methods.研究伦理教育实施中的有效实践:教学方法的定性综述
Account Res. 2017;24(5):297-321. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2017.1301210. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
3
Effectiveness of a responsible conduct of research course: a preliminary study.科研行为规范课程的有效性:一项初步研究。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2007 Jun;13(2):249-64. doi: 10.1007/s11948-007-9012-y. Epub 2007 Jun 19.
4
Responding to challenges in educating for the responsible conduct of research.应对科研行为责任教育中的挑战。
Acad Med. 2007 Sep;82(9):870-5. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f77fe.
5
The ethics of scientific research: an analysis of focus groups of scientists and institutional representatives.科学研究的伦理:对科学家和机构代表焦点小组的分析
J Investig Med. 1997 Aug;45(6):371-80.
6
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Workshop Summary: Enhancing Opportunities for Training and Retention of a Diverse Biomedical Workforce.美国国立心肺血液研究所研讨会总结:增加培训机会并留住多元化生物医学人才队伍。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 Apr;13(4):562-7. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201509-624OT.
7
Beyond responsible conduct in research: new pedagogies to address macroethics of nanobiotechnologies.超越研究中的负责任行为:应对纳米生物技术宏观伦理的新教学法
J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2007;17(1):1-12. doi: 10.1615/jlongtermeffmedimplants.v17.i1.10.
8
Test ordering by GP trainees: Effects of an educational intervention on attitudes and intended practice.全科医学培训学员的检查项目开具:一项教育干预对态度和预期行为的影响
Can Fam Physician. 2016 Sep;62(9):733-41.
9
Cross-cultural considerations in U.S. research ethics education.美国研究伦理教育中的跨文化考量
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2014 Dec 15;15(2):130-4. doi: 10.1128/jmbe.v15i2.860. eCollection 2014 Dec.
10
Primary Care Research Team Assessment (PCRTA): development and evaluation.基层医疗研究团队评估(PCRTA):开发与评估
Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract. 2002 Feb(81):iii-vi, 1-72.

本文引用的文献

1
Reagent Validation to Facilitate Experimental Reproducibility.试剂验证以促进实验可重复性
Curr Protoc Pharmacol. 2018 Jun;81(1):e40. doi: 10.1002/cpph.40. Epub 2018 May 16.
2
A Survey on Data Reproducibility and the Effect of Publication Process on the Ethical Reporting of Laboratory Research.关于数据可重复性的调查,以及发表过程对实验室研究伦理报告的影响。
Clin Cancer Res. 2018 Jul 15;24(14):3447-3455. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-0227. Epub 2018 Apr 11.
3
Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to?观点:科学真的面临可重复性危机了吗?我们需要解决它吗?
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Mar 13;115(11):2628-2631. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1708272114.
4
The challenges with the validation of research antibodies.研究抗体验证面临的挑战。
F1000Res. 2017 Feb 17;6:161. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.10851.1. eCollection 2017.
5
1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility.1500名科学家揭开了可重复性的盖子。
Nature. 2016 May 26;533(7604):452-4. doi: 10.1038/533452a.
6
The Economics of Reproducibility in Preclinical Research.临床前研究中的可重复性经济学
PLoS Biol. 2015 Jun 9;13(6):e1002165. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002165. eCollection 2015 Jun.
7
Drug development: Raise standards for preclinical cancer research.药物研发:提高临床前癌症研究标准。
Nature. 2012 Mar 28;483(7391):531-3. doi: 10.1038/483531a.
8
Why most published research findings are false.为何大多数已发表的研究结果是错误的。
PLoS Med. 2005 Aug;2(8):e124. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124. Epub 2005 Aug 30.