• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

营造青少年作为共同研究者的文化氛围:为期一年的STEM人才培养计划启动

Creating a Culture of Youth as Co-Researchers: The Kickoff of a Year-Long STEM Pipeline Program.

作者信息

Jacquez Farrah, Vaughn Lisa, Boards Alicia, Deters Alice, Wells Jody, Maynard Kathie

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH.

Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH.

出版信息

J STEM Outreach. 2020;3(1). doi: 10.15695/jstem/v3i1.02. Epub 2020 Feb 18.

DOI:10.15695/jstem/v3i1.02
PMID:33948536
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8092354/
Abstract

STEM pipeline programs often include research experiences for youth, but fewer focus on youth as shared decision-makers or leaders in research efforts. Youth participatory action research (YPAR) and community-based participatory research (CBPR) orientations suggest that the quality and relevance of research will benefit from youth partnership. Because youth do not traditionally have the opportunity to serve in this type of leadership capacity, STEM pipeline programs that wish to elevate the role of youth in research must create a new culture of co-creation that upends the traditional pedagogical models adolescents experience in high school. We present Research Kickoff as a strategy to engage youth as co-researchers from their very first experience in a year-long STEM pipeline program. We designed activities around a framework consisting of six components: content, process, voice, network, engagement, and culture. Each of the six components of our framework are represented in a series of activities that include participatory research processes, inviting collaboration and valuing diverse expertise, and relationship building. To inform future programs interested in engaging youth as co-researchers, we detail the iterative development of Research Kickoff over two cohorts and describe how it serves to engage youth as change agents from the first touch.

摘要

STEM人才培养项目通常会为青少年提供研究经历,但较少关注青少年作为研究工作中的共同决策者或领导者。青少年参与式行动研究(YPAR)和基于社区的参与式研究(CBPR)方向表明,研究的质量和相关性将受益于青少年的参与。由于青少年传统上没有机会担任这种领导角色,希望提升青少年在研究中作用的STEM人才培养项目必须创造一种新的共同创造文化,颠覆青少年在高中所经历的传统教学模式。我们提出“研究启动”作为一种策略,让青少年从参与为期一年的STEM人才培养项目的最初经历起就成为共同研究者。我们围绕一个由六个部分组成的框架设计了活动:内容、过程、发言权、网络、参与度和文化。我们框架的六个部分都体现在一系列活动中,这些活动包括参与式研究过程、邀请合作并重视不同的专业知识以及建立关系。为了给未来有兴趣让青少年成为共同研究者的项目提供参考,我们详细介绍了“研究启动”在两个群体中的迭代发展,并描述了它如何从一开始就促使青少年成为变革推动者。

相似文献

1
Creating a Culture of Youth as Co-Researchers: The Kickoff of a Year-Long STEM Pipeline Program.营造青少年作为共同研究者的文化氛围:为期一年的STEM人才培养计划启动
J STEM Outreach. 2020;3(1). doi: 10.15695/jstem/v3i1.02. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
2
An interdisciplinary framework of youth participatory action research informed by curricula, youth, adults, and researchers.一个由课程、青年、成年人和研究人员共同构建的跨学科青年参与式行动研究框架。
J Res Adolesc. 2025 Mar;35(1):e13007. doi: 10.1111/jora.13007. Epub 2024 Jul 28.
3
The INSCHOOL project: showcasing participatory qualitative methods derived from patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) work with young people with long-term health conditions.INSCHOOL项目:展示源自患者及公众参与(PPIE)工作的参与式定性方法,该工作针对患有长期健康状况的年轻人开展。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Oct 12;9(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00496-5.
4
Co-designing obesity prevention interventions together with children: intervention mapping meets youth-led participatory action research.与儿童共同设计肥胖预防干预措施:干预映射与青年主导的参与式行动研究相结合。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019 Dec 12;16(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12966-019-0891-5.
5
Pathways to Youth Empowerment and Community Connectedness: A Study of Youth-Adult Partnership in Malaysian After-School, Co-Curricular Programs.促进青少年赋权和社区联系的途径:马来西亚课外、课程辅助活动中青年-成人伙伴关系研究。
J Youth Adolesc. 2016 Aug;45(8):1638-51. doi: 10.1007/s10964-015-0320-2. Epub 2015 Jun 20.
6
"My resistance melts away": The role of mindfulness in supporting participatory researchers' efforts to share power with youth co-researchers.“我的抵触情绪消散了”:正念在支持参与式研究者与青年共同研究者分享权力的努力中所起的作用。
Am J Community Psychol. 2024 Dec;74(3-4):236-248. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12760. Epub 2024 Jul 3.
7
Participatory Research Approaches with Youth: Ethics, Engagement, and Meaningful Action.参与式研究方法与青年:伦理、参与和有意义的行动。
Am J Community Psychol. 2021 Sep;68(1-2):142-153. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12501. Epub 2021 Apr 3.
8
Out-of-school settings as a developmental context for children and youth.校外环境作为儿童和青少年的发展背景。
Adv Child Dev Behav. 2005;33:43-77. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2407(05)80004-7.
9
Using Youth Participatory Action Research as a Health Intervention in Community Settings.利用青年参与式行动研究在社区环境中开展健康干预。
Health Promot Pract. 2020 Jul;21(4):573-581. doi: 10.1177/1524839918818831. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
10
Using community-based participatory research to develop the PARTNERS youth violence prevention program.运用基于社区的参与性研究来开发“伙伴关系”青少年暴力预防项目。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2010 Fall;4(3):207-16. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2010.0005.

引用本文的文献

1
An interdisciplinary framework of youth participatory action research informed by curricula, youth, adults, and researchers.一个由课程、青年、成年人和研究人员共同构建的跨学科青年参与式行动研究框架。
J Res Adolesc. 2025 Mar;35(1):e13007. doi: 10.1111/jora.13007. Epub 2024 Jul 28.
2
Citizen Science to improve healthy and active living among adolescents in four European countries: a protocol of the cluster randomised controlled trial of the Science Engagement to Empower aDolescentS (SEEDS) project.公民科学提高四个欧洲国家青少年的健康和积极生活:Science Engagement to Empower aDolescentS(SEEDS)项目的集群随机对照试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 May 8;13(5):e070169. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070169.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Taking a Look at the Heath Sciences and Technology Academy (HSTA): Student-Research Partnership Increases Survey Size, Hands-on STEM Learning, and Research-Community Connections.审视健康科学与技术学院(HSTA):学生与研究的合作扩大了调查规模、增加了STEM实践学习并加强了研究与社区的联系。
J STEM Outreach. 2018 Jan;1(1). doi: 10.15695/jstem/v1i1.7. Epub 2018 Jan 26.
2
Digital storytelling as student-centred pedagogy: empowering high school students to frame their futures.以学生为中心的教学法——数字叙事:助力高中生规划未来。
Res Pract Technol Enhanc Learn. 2017;12(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s41039-017-0061-9. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
3
Fostering Engagement, Reflexivity, and 21st-Century Skills in Middle School: A Pilot Collaborative Action Research on Identity Formation with Adolescent Co-Researchers.
在中学培养参与度、反思能力和21世纪技能:一项与青少年共同研究者开展的关于身份认同形成的试点合作行动研究。
J Intell. 2022 Sep 6;10(3):64. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence10030064.
4
Group Level Assessment (GLA) as a methodological tool to facilitate science education.小组水平评估(GLA)作为一种促进科学教育的方法工具。
Res Sci Educ. 2022 Apr;52(2):539-551. doi: 10.1007/s11165-020-09960-8. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
Perspectives of Community Co-Researchers About Group Dynamics and Equitable Partnership Within a Community-Academic Research Team.
社区合作研究者对社区学术研究团队中的群体动态和公平伙伴关系的看法。
Health Educ Behav. 2018 Oct;45(5):682-689. doi: 10.1177/1090198118769374. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
4
Hindsight is 20/20: Reflections on the evolution of concept mapping.事后诸葛亮:对概念图演变的反思。
Eval Program Plann. 2017 Feb;60:176-185. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.08.009. Epub 2016 Aug 28.
5
Concept mapping methodology and community-engaged research: A perfect pairing.概念图方法与社区参与式研究:完美结合。
Eval Program Plann. 2017 Feb;60:229-237. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.08.013. Epub 2016 Aug 28.
6
Calling all stakeholders: group-level assessment (GLA)-a qualitative and participatory method for large groups.呼吁所有利益相关者:群体层面评估(GLA)——一种针对大型群体的定性和参与式方法。
Eval Rev. 2014 Aug;38(4):336-55. doi: 10.1177/0193841X14544903. Epub 2014 Aug 21.
7
Young people's food practices and social relationships. A thematic synthesis.年轻人的饮食行为与社会关系。一项主题综合研究。
Appetite. 2014 Nov;82:50-60. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.07.005. Epub 2014 Jul 10.
8
Twenty-first century science as a relational process: from eureka! to team science and a place for community psychology.二十一世纪的科学作为一种关系过程:从“尤里卡!”到团队科学以及社区心理学的一席之地。
Am J Community Psychol. 2014 Jun;53(3-4):475-90. doi: 10.1007/s10464-014-9625-7.
9
Patching the Pipeline: Reducing Educational Disparities in the Sciences Through Minority Training Programs.修复人才培养渠道:通过少数族裔培训项目减少科学领域的教育差距。
Educ Eval Policy Anal. 2011 Mar 1;33(1). doi: 10.3102/0162373710392371.
10
The Health Sciences and Technology Academy: an educational pipeline to address health care disparities in West Virginia.健康科学与技术学院:解决西弗吉尼亚州医疗保健差距的教育渠道。
Acad Med. 2014 Jan;89(1):37-42. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000047.