• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

小组水平评估(GLA)作为一种促进科学教育的方法工具。

Group Level Assessment (GLA) as a methodological tool to facilitate science education.

作者信息

Vaughn Lisa M, Jacquez Farrah, Deters Alice, Boards Alicia

机构信息

Pediatrics Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center/University of Cincinnati College of Medicine.

Department of Psychology, University of Cincinnati, PO Box 2210376, Cincinnati, OH 45229.

出版信息

Res Sci Educ. 2022 Apr;52(2):539-551. doi: 10.1007/s11165-020-09960-8. Epub 2020 Sep 25.

DOI:10.1007/s11165-020-09960-8
PMID:35321322
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8937028/
Abstract

Group Level Assessment (GLA) is a qualitative, participatory research methodology that can be used within science education, specifically to meet the Science and Engineering Practices dimension of the K-12 Next Generation Science Standards. In contrast to traditional qualitative research methods, GLA is a concrete methodological tool intended for large groups. GLA follows a 7-step process in which diverse stakeholders work together to generate, analyze and prioritize ideas that lead to action planning. Emphasizing personal relevance, shared decision making, systematic inquiry, and collaboration in the design and process, GLA is best positioned conceptually and theoretically within community-based participatory research and inquiry-based learning approaches. The purpose of this manuscript is to describe how GLA can be utilized as an innovative methodology to incorporate students' lived experiences in science education. We describe how to conduct GLA and provide a case example of GLA in action conducted as part of a larger science education program with students and teachers in STEM.

摘要

小组层面评估(GLA)是一种定性的参与式研究方法,可用于科学教育领域,特别是为了满足K-12下一代科学标准中的科学与工程实践维度。与传统的定性研究方法不同,GLA是一种适用于大型群体的具体方法工具。GLA遵循一个7步流程,在这个流程中,不同的利益相关者共同努力,生成、分析并优先考虑那些能够促成行动计划的想法。GLA强调个人相关性、共同决策、系统探究以及设计和过程中的协作,在基于社区的参与式研究和基于探究的学习方法中,GLA在概念和理论上处于最佳位置。本手稿的目的是描述如何将GLA用作一种创新方法,将学生的生活经验纳入科学教育。我们描述了如何进行GLA,并提供了一个GLA实际应用的案例,该案例是作为一个更大的科学教育项目的一部分,与STEM领域的学生和教师一起开展的。

相似文献

1
Group Level Assessment (GLA) as a methodological tool to facilitate science education.小组水平评估(GLA)作为一种促进科学教育的方法工具。
Res Sci Educ. 2022 Apr;52(2):539-551. doi: 10.1007/s11165-020-09960-8. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
2
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
3
Calling all stakeholders: group-level assessment (GLA)-a qualitative and participatory method for large groups.呼吁所有利益相关者:群体层面评估(GLA)——一种针对大型群体的定性和参与式方法。
Eval Rev. 2014 Aug;38(4):336-55. doi: 10.1177/0193841X14544903. Epub 2014 Aug 21.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
Group Level Assessment Methodology as a Liberating Structure Within Qualitative and Participatory Research.作为定性和参与性研究中一种解放性结构的群体层面评估方法
Qual Health Res. 2025 Jul;35(8):827-836. doi: 10.1177/10497323241240654. Epub 2024 Apr 22.
6
Facilitating health promoting ideas and actions: participatory research in an underserved Swedish residential area.促进健康理念和行为:在服务不足的瑞典住宅区进行参与式研究。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jan 24;22(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12431-y.
7
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
8
"This Is Not Gym": Enacting Student Voice Pedagogies to Promote Social and Emotional Learning and Meaningful Physical Education.“这不是健身房”:践行学生发声教学法以促进社会情感学习和有意义的体育教育
Front Sports Act Living. 2021 Oct 26;3:764613. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2021.764613. eCollection 2021.
9
Feasibility and outcomes of paid undergraduate student nurse positions.本科护生带薪岗位的可行性与结果
Nurs Leadersh (Tor Ont). 2006 Sep;19(3):e1-14. doi: 10.12927/cjnl.2006.19032.
10
An Innovative Online Knowledge Translation Curriculum in Graduate Education.研究生教育中的创新型在线知识转化课程。
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2020 Jun;17(3):229-238. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12440. Epub 2020 Jun 1.

引用本文的文献

1
The challenges of decolonising participatory research in indigenous contexts: the community of practice experience in Nunavik.在本土背景下使参与式研究非殖民化面临的挑战:努纳武特的实践共同体经验。
Int J Circumpolar Health. 2022 Dec;81(1):2087846. doi: 10.1080/22423982.2022.2087846.

本文引用的文献

1
Creating a Culture of Youth as Co-Researchers: The Kickoff of a Year-Long STEM Pipeline Program.营造青少年作为共同研究者的文化氛围:为期一年的STEM人才培养计划启动
J STEM Outreach. 2020;3(1). doi: 10.15695/jstem/v3i1.02. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
2
Methodological Progress Note: Group Level Assessment.方法学进展说明:组水平评估
J Hosp Med. 2019 Oct 1;14(10):627-629. doi: 10.12788/jhm.3289. Epub 2019 Aug 16.
3
Inpatient Communication Barriers and Drivers When Caring for Limited English Proficiency Children.照顾英语水平有限的儿童时的住院患者沟通障碍和驱动因素。
J Hosp Med. 2019 Oct 1;14(10):607-613. doi: 10.12788/jhm.3240. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
4
A seat at the table: Exploring the experiences of underrepresented minority women in STEM graduate programs.在决策中有一席之地:探索在STEM研究生项目中代表性不足的少数族裔女性的经历。
J Prev Interv Community. 2019 Oct-Dec;47(4):354-365. doi: 10.1080/10852352.2019.1617383. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
5
Factors Influencing Use of Continuous Physiologic Monitors for Hospitalized Pediatric Patients.影响住院儿科患者连续生理监测仪使用的因素。
Hosp Pediatr. 2019 Jun;9(6):423-428. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2019-0007. Epub 2019 May 1.
6
Fathers Know Best: Inner-City African American Fathers' Perceptions Regarding Their Involvement in the Pediatric Medical Home.父亲最了解:内城非裔美国父亲对其参与儿科医疗之家的看法。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2018 Jun;5(3):617-622. doi: 10.1007/s40615-017-0407-4. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
7
A realist evaluation of community-based participatory research: partnership synergy, trust building and related ripple effects.基于社区参与式研究的现实主义评价:伙伴关系协同效应、信任建立及相关连锁反应。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Jul 30;15:725. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1949-1.
8
Reimagining the Pipeline: Advancing STEM Diversity, Persistence, and Success.重新构想人才培养渠道:推动STEM领域的多元化、坚持与成功。
Bioscience. 2014 Jul;64(7):612-618. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biu076.
9
Empowering immigrant youth in Chicago: utilizing CBPR to document the impact of a Youth Health Service Corps program.增强芝加哥移民青年的权能:利用社区参与式行动研究记录青年健康服务团项目的影响。
Fam Community Health. 2015 Jan-Mar;38(1):12-21. doi: 10.1097/FCH.0000000000000058.
10
Calling all stakeholders: group-level assessment (GLA)-a qualitative and participatory method for large groups.呼吁所有利益相关者:群体层面评估(GLA)——一种针对大型群体的定性和参与式方法。
Eval Rev. 2014 Aug;38(4):336-55. doi: 10.1177/0193841X14544903. Epub 2014 Aug 21.