• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于贝叶斯机器学习的造血干细胞移植最优供者选择。

Optimal Donor Selection for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Using Bayesian Machine Learning.

机构信息

Division of Biostatistics, Institute for Health and Equity, Medical College of Wisconsin (MCW), Milwaukee, WI.

Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI.

出版信息

JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2021 May;5:494-507. doi: 10.1200/CCI.20.00185.

DOI:10.1200/CCI.20.00185
PMID:33950708
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8443829/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Donor selection practices for matched unrelated donor (MUD) hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) vary, and the impact of optimizing donor selection in a patient-specific way using modern machine learning (ML) models has not been studied.

METHODS

We trained a Bayesian ML model in 10,318 patients who underwent MUD HCT from 1999 to 2014 to provide patient- and donor-specific predictions of clinically severe (grade 3 or 4) acute graft-versus-host disease or death by day 180. The model was validated in 3,501 patients from 2015 to 2016 with archived records of potential donors at search. Donor selection optimizing predicted outcomes was implemented over either an unlimited donor pool or the donors in the search archives. Posterior mean differences in outcomes from optimal donor selection versus actual practice were summarized per patient and across the population with 95% intervals.

RESULTS

Event rates were 33% (training) and 37% (validation). Among donor features, only age affected outcomes, with the effect consistent regardless of patient features. The median (interquartile range) difference in age between the youngest donor at search and the selected donor was 6 (1-10) years, whereas the number of donors per patient younger than the selected donor was 6 (1-36). Fourteen percent of the validation data set had an approximate 5% absolute reduction in event rates from selecting the youngest donor at search versus the actual donor used, leading to an absolute population reduction of 1% (95% interval, 0 to 3).

CONCLUSION

We confirmed the singular importance of selecting the youngest available MUD, irrespective of patient features, identified potential for improved HCT outcomes by selecting a younger MUD, and demonstrated use of novel ML models transferable to optimize other complex treatment decisions in a patient-specific way.

摘要

目的

用于匹配无关供者(MUD)造血细胞移植(HCT)的供者选择实践存在差异,并且尚未研究使用现代机器学习(ML)模型以患者特异性方式优化供者选择对移植结果的影响。

方法

我们在 1999 年至 2014 年间接受 MUD HCT 的 10318 例患者中训练了一个贝叶斯 ML 模型,以提供患者和供者特异性预测,预测临床严重(3 级或 4 级)急性移植物抗宿主病或 180 天内死亡的风险。该模型在 2015 年至 2016 年间接受了 3501 例患者的验证,这些患者的潜在供者在搜索时具有存档记录。在无限制的供者库或搜索档案中的供者中实施了优化预测结果的供者选择。对每个患者和整个患者群体,使用 95%区间总结了最优供者选择与实际实践之间结果的后验均值差异。

结果

事件发生率为 33%(训练)和 37%(验证)。在供者特征中,只有年龄影响结局,且无论患者特征如何,其影响均一致。在搜索时选择的最年轻供者和选定供者之间的年龄中位数(四分位距)差异为 6 岁(1-10 岁),而每个患者比选定供者年轻的供者数为 6 个(1-36 个)。验证数据集的 14%患者的事件率从选择搜索时最年轻的供者降低约 5%,导致绝对人群降低 1%(95%区间,0 至 3)。

结论

我们证实选择最年轻的可用 MUD 具有独特的重要性,而与患者特征无关,确定了通过选择更年轻的 MUD 提高 HCT 结局的潜力,并证明了使用新颖的 ML 模型以患者特异性方式优化其他复杂治疗决策的可行性。

相似文献

1
Optimal Donor Selection for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Using Bayesian Machine Learning.基于贝叶斯机器学习的造血干细胞移植最优供者选择。
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2021 May;5:494-507. doi: 10.1200/CCI.20.00185.
2
Low-Dose Antithymocyte Globulin for Graft-versus-Host-Disease Prophylaxis in Matched Unrelated Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.低剂量抗胸腺细胞球蛋白预防亲缘全相合异基因造血干细胞移植后移植物抗宿主病
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2017 Dec;23(12):2096-2101. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2017.08.007. Epub 2017 Aug 15.
3
Donor-Recipient Matching for KIR Genotypes Reduces Chronic GVHD and Missing Inhibitory KIR Ligands Protect against Relapse after Myeloablative, HLA Matched Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.KIR基因型的供受者匹配可减少慢性移植物抗宿主病,且缺乏抑制性KIR配体可预防清髓性、HLA匹配的造血细胞移植后的复发。
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 24;11(6):e0158242. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158242. eCollection 2016.
4
Hematopoietic cell transplantation for mucopolysaccharidosis patients is safe and effective: results after implementation of international guidelines.造血干细胞移植治疗黏多糖贮积症患者安全有效:国际指南实施后的结果
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015 Jun;21(6):1106-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2015.02.011. Epub 2015 Feb 20.
5
Total Body Irradiation-Based Myeloablative Haploidentical Stem Cell Transplantation Is a Safe and Effective Alternative to Unrelated Donor Transplantation in Patients Without Matched Sibling Donors.对于没有匹配同胞供者的患者,基于全身照射的清髓性单倍体相合干细胞移植是无关供者移植的一种安全有效的替代方案。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015 Jul;21(7):1299-307. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2015.03.003. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
6
Optimal Donor Selection Across Multiple Outcomes For Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation By Bayesian Nonparametric Machine Learning.通过贝叶斯非参数机器学习进行造血干细胞移植多结局的最佳供体选择
medRxiv. 2024 May 9:2024.05.09.24307134. doi: 10.1101/2024.05.09.24307134.
7
[Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for hematological malignancies: an algorithm for donor selection].[异基因造血干细胞移植治疗血液系统恶性肿瘤:供体选择算法]
Rinsho Ketsueki. 2019;60(6):626-634. doi: 10.11406/rinketsu.60.626.
8
Matched Family versus Alternative Donor Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Patients with Thalassemia Major: Experience from a Tertiary Referral Center in South India.重型地中海贫血患者的匹配家族供者与非血缘供者造血干细胞移植的比较:来自印度南部一家三级转诊中心的经验。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2020 Jul;26(7):1326-1331. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.03.016. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
9
Results of a 2-arm, phase 2 clinical trial using post-transplantation cyclophosphamide for the prevention of graft-versus-host disease in haploidentical donor and mismatched unrelated donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.一项双臂2期临床试验的结果,该试验使用移植后环磷酰胺预防单倍体相合供者和错配无关供者造血干细胞移植中的移植物抗宿主病。
Cancer. 2016 Nov 15;122(21):3316-3326. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30180. Epub 2016 Jul 12.
10
Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide for Graft-versus- Host Disease Prophylaxis in Multiple Myeloma Patients Who Underwent Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: First Comparison by Donor Type. A Study from the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.异基因造血细胞移植后环磷酰胺预防多发性骨髓瘤患者移植物抗宿主病:供者类型的首次比较。一项来自欧洲血液和骨髓移植学会慢性恶性肿瘤工作组的研究。
Transplant Cell Ther. 2021 Dec;27(12):999.e1-999.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2021.09.008. Epub 2021 Sep 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes of haploidentical vs mismatched unrelated donor HCT with posttransplant cyclophosphamide prophylaxis.单倍体相合与不匹配无关供者造血干细胞移植并采用移植后环磷酰胺预防的结果
Blood Adv. 2025 Aug 12;9(15):4023-4036. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2025016236.
2
Choosing Between HLA-Mismatched Unrelated and Haploidentical Donors: Donor Age Considerations.在HLA不匹配的无关供体和单倍型相合供体之间进行选择:供体年龄的考量
Transplant Cell Ther. 2025 Sep;31(9):680-692. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2025.05.019. Epub 2025 May 24.
3
The Applications of Machine Learning in the Management of Patients Undergoing Stem Cell Transplantation: Are We Ready?机器学习在接受干细胞移植患者管理中的应用:我们准备好了吗?
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jan 25;17(3):395. doi: 10.3390/cancers17030395.
4
Novel machine learning technique further clarifies unrelated donor selection to optimize transplantation outcomes.新型机器学习技术进一步明确无关供体选择以优化移植结果。
Blood Adv. 2024 Dec 10;8(23):6082-6087. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2024013756.
5
Haploidentical vs HLA-matched sibling donor HCT with PTCy prophylaxis: HLA factors and donor age considerations.单倍体相合与 HLA 匹配的同胞供者造血干细胞移植加 PTCy 预防:HLA 因素和供者年龄的考虑。
Blood Adv. 2024 Oct 22;8(20):5306-5314. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2024013853.
6
Interplay between donor age and HLA-DP matching in 10/10 HLA-matched unrelated donor HCT.10/10 HLA 匹配的无关供者造血干细胞移植中供者年龄与 HLA-DP 匹配的相互作用。
Blood Adv. 2024 Oct 22;8(20):5438-5449. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2024013677.
7
The Evolution of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation to Overcome Access Disparities: The Role of NMDP.造血干细胞移植克服准入差距的演进:NMDP 的作用。
Cells. 2024 May 29;13(11):933. doi: 10.3390/cells13110933.
8
Optimal Donor Selection Across Multiple Outcomes For Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation By Bayesian Nonparametric Machine Learning.通过贝叶斯非参数机器学习进行造血干细胞移植多结局的最佳供体选择
medRxiv. 2024 May 9:2024.05.09.24307134. doi: 10.1101/2024.05.09.24307134.
9
Donor germ-line variants associate with outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.供者种系变异与骨髓增生异常综合征患者异基因造血干细胞移植结局相关。
Am J Hematol. 2024 Apr;99(4):770-773. doi: 10.1002/ajh.27243. Epub 2024 Feb 9.
10
Bayesian Approaches in Exploring Gene-environment and Gene-gene Interactions: A Comprehensive Review.贝叶斯方法在探索基因-环境和基因-基因相互作用中的应用:全面综述。
Cancer Genomics Proteomics. 2023 Dec;20(6suppl):669-678. doi: 10.21873/cgp.20414.

本文引用的文献

1
Optimal individualized decision rules from a multi-arm trial: A comparison of methods and an application to tailoring inter-donation intervals among blood donors in the UK.多臂试验中的最优个体化决策规则:方法比较及在英国献血者献血间隔调整中的应用
Stat Methods Med Res. 2020 Nov;29(11):3113-3134. doi: 10.1177/0962280220920669. Epub 2020 May 8.
2
Urgent Time to Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: A National Survey of Transplant Physicians and Unrelated Donor Search Coordinators Facilitated by the Histocompatibility Advisory Group to the National Marrow Donor Program.异体造血细胞移植的紧迫时机:全国骨髓捐献者计划组织相容性咨询组协助进行的移植医生和非亲缘供者检索协调员的全国性调查。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2019 Dec;25(12):2501-2506. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2019.08.002. Epub 2019 Aug 13.
3
Selection of unrelated donors and cord blood units for hematopoietic cell transplantation: guidelines from the NMDP/CIBMTR.无关供者和脐带血造血细胞移植的选择:来自 NMDP/CIBMTR 的指南。
Blood. 2019 Sep 19;134(12):924-934. doi: 10.1182/blood.2019001212. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
4
Nonparametric competing risks analysis using Bayesian Additive Regression Trees.贝叶斯加法回归树在非参数竞争风险分析中的应用。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2020 Jan;29(1):57-77. doi: 10.1177/0962280218822140. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
5
Development of an Unrelated Donor Selection Score Predictive of Survival after HCT: Donor Age Matters Most.无关供者选择评分的开发可预测 HCT 后的生存:供者年龄最重要。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2018 May;24(5):1049-1056. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.02.006. Epub 2018 Feb 14.
6
Decision making and uncertainty quantification for individualized treatments using Bayesian Additive Regression Trees.基于贝叶斯加法回归树的个体化治疗的决策制定与不确定性量化。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2019 Apr;28(4):1079-1093. doi: 10.1177/0962280217746191. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
7
HapLogic: A Predictive Human Leukocyte Antigen-Matching Algorithm to Enhance Rapid Identification of the Optimal Unrelated Hematopoietic Stem Cell Sources for Transplantation.HapLogic:一种预测性人类白细胞抗原匹配算法,用于加强对移植最佳无关造血干细胞来源的快速识别。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2016 Nov;22(11):2038-2046. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2016.07.022. Epub 2016 Aug 2.
8
Charting improvements in US registry HLA typing ambiguity using a typing resolution score.使用分型分辨率评分记录美国登记处人类白细胞抗原(HLA)分型模糊性的改善情况。
Hum Immunol. 2016 Jul;77(7):542-9. doi: 10.1016/j.humimm.2016.05.002. Epub 2016 May 6.
9
Nonparametric survival analysis using Bayesian Additive Regression Trees (BART).使用贝叶斯加法回归树(BART)进行非参数生存分析。
Stat Med. 2016 Jul 20;35(16):2741-53. doi: 10.1002/sim.6893. Epub 2016 Feb 7.
10
The effect of donor characteristics on survival after unrelated donor transplantation for hematologic malignancy.供者特征对血液系统恶性肿瘤异基因供者移植后生存的影响。
Blood. 2016 Jan 14;127(2):260-7. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-08-663823. Epub 2015 Nov 2.