• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

原核评分可提高 ICSI 周期胚胎着床成功的预测。

Pronuclear score improves prediction of embryo implantation success in ICSI cycles.

机构信息

UOS Physiopathology of Human Reproduction, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo R. Benzi, 10, 16132, Genova, Italy.

Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DINOGMI), Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 May 5;21(1):361. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03820-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12884-021-03820-7
PMID:33952184
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8097973/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In assisted reproduction technology embryo competence is routinely evaluated on morphological criteria but efficacy remains relatively low. Additional information could be obtained by evaluating pronuclear (PN) morphology. Up to now controversial results have been reported about the prognostic value of PN score. One of the main limitations of literature data is the use of different PN classification methods. In this regard, in 2011 the ESHRE and Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine defined three PN categories to standardize zygote assessment. In this study we evaluated whether the consensus ESHRE-Alpha system for the pronuclear scoring could be an useful additional criterion to improve prediction of embryo implantation potential.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, longitudinal, observational, cohort study. We included 3004 zygotes from 555 women who underwent ICSI treatment at our Center between January 2014 and June 2019. The PN were categorized as score 1: symmetrical, 2: non-symmetrical, 3: abnormal. A subset of 110 zygotes did not cleaved. On day 2-3 1163 embryos were transferred, 232 arrested, and 9 were cryopreserved. Among the 1490 embryos cultured up to day 5-7, 516 became blastocysts: 123 were transferred on day 5 and 393 were cryopreserved. Comparisons of age, cleavage and blastocyst rate, quality of embryos, implantation success among PN score groups were evaluated by chi-square test or Kruskal-Wallis test as appropriate. Potential predictors of embryo implantation were first tested in univariable analysis using generalized estimating equations taking into account correlation between embryos originated from the same patient. Then, variables potentially associated with implantation success (P<0.05) were included in a multivariable analysis for calculating the adjusted odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in patients'age, cleavage and blastulation rates, and embryo morphology among the three PNscore groups. The PN score 1-embryos had a greater implantation success respect to score 2-3-ones (OR 1.83; 95% CI 1.34-2.50, P=0.0001). Consistently, the pronuclear score remained predictive of implantation in top quality embryos (OR 1.68; 95%CI 1.17-2.42, P= 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

The consensus pronuclear score may be routinely included among criteria for embryo evaluation to increase patients' chance of becoming pregnant.

摘要

背景

在辅助生殖技术中,胚胎的活力通常通过形态学标准进行评估,但效果仍然相对较低。通过评估原核(PN)形态,可以获得更多信息。到目前为止,关于 PN 评分的预后价值,已有报道结果存在争议。文献数据的主要局限性之一是使用不同的 PN 分类方法。在这方面,2011 年,ESHRE 和生殖医学阿尔法科学家定义了三个 PN 类别,以规范胚胎评估。在这项研究中,我们评估了共识 ESHRE-Alpha 系统用于原核评分是否可以作为提高胚胎着床潜能预测的有用附加标准。

方法

这是一项回顾性、纵向、观察性队列研究。我们纳入了 2014 年 1 月至 2019 年 6 月在我们中心接受 ICSI 治疗的 555 名女性的 3004 个受精卵。PN 被分为 1 分:对称;2 分:不对称;3 分:异常。110 个未分裂的受精卵为一组。在第 2-3 天,有 1163 个胚胎被移植,232 个胚胎停滞,9 个胚胎被冷冻。在培养至第 5-7 天的 1490 个胚胎中,有 516 个发育成囊胚:5 个胚胎在第 5 天被移植,393 个胚胎被冷冻。对不同 PN 评分组的年龄、分裂和囊胚形成率、胚胎质量、着床成功率进行比较,采用卡方检验或 Kruskal-Wallis 检验,如有必要。采用广义估计方程,考虑到来自同一患者的胚胎之间的相关性,首先在单变量分析中测试胚胎着床的潜在预测因子。然后,将与着床成功率相关的潜在变量(P<0.05)纳入多变量分析,计算调整后的优势比(OR)和 95%置信区间(CI)。

结果

在三组 PN 评分中,患者年龄、分裂和囊胚形成率以及胚胎形态均无显著差异。PN 评分 1 组胚胎的着床成功率高于评分 2-3 组(OR 1.83;95%CI 1.34-2.50,P=0.0001)。同样,原核评分在优质胚胎中仍然具有预测着床的能力(OR 1.68;95%CI 1.17-2.42,P=0.005)。

结论

共识原核评分可常规纳入胚胎评估标准,以增加患者妊娠机会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7066/8097973/f3905894e0a4/12884_2021_3820_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7066/8097973/07356718f360/12884_2021_3820_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7066/8097973/2aad1dc3de8e/12884_2021_3820_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7066/8097973/f3905894e0a4/12884_2021_3820_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7066/8097973/07356718f360/12884_2021_3820_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7066/8097973/2aad1dc3de8e/12884_2021_3820_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7066/8097973/f3905894e0a4/12884_2021_3820_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Pronuclear score improves prediction of embryo implantation success in ICSI cycles.原核评分可提高 ICSI 周期胚胎着床成功的预测。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 May 5;21(1):361. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03820-7.
2
The effect of pronuclear morphology on embryo quality parameters and blastocyst transfer outcome.原核形态对胚胎质量参数及囊胚移植结局的影响。
Hum Reprod. 2001 Nov;16(11):2357-61. doi: 10.1093/humrep/16.11.2357.
3
[Prognostic value of the pronuclear morphology pattern of zygotes for implantation rate].[受精卵原核形态模式对着床率的预后价值]
Ginekol Pol. 2003 Jul;74(7):508-13.
4
Developmental potential of human pronuclear zygotes in relation to their pronuclear orientation.人类原核受精卵的发育潜能与其原核取向的关系
Hum Reprod. 2004 Feb;19(2):294-9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh064.
5
Morphokinetic analysis and embryonic prediction for blastocyst formation through an integrated time-lapse system.通过集成延时系统对囊胚形成进行形态动力学分析和胚胎预测。
Fertil Steril. 2016 Feb;105(2):376-84.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.11.001. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
6
Worth the wait? Day 7 blastocysts have lower euploidy rates but similar sustained implantation rates as Day 5 and Day 6 blastocysts.值得等待吗?第 7 天的囊胚具有较低的非整倍体率,但与第 5 天和第 6 天的囊胚具有相似的持续着床率。
Hum Reprod. 2019 Sep 29;34(9):1632-1639. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez138.
7
Comparison of pronuclear zygote morphology and early cleavage status of zygotes as additional criteria in the selection of day 3 embryos: a randomized study.原核受精卵形态及受精卵早期分裂状态作为第3天胚胎选择的附加标准的比较:一项随机研究。
Fertil Steril. 2006 Feb;85(2):347-52. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.07.1319.
8
Embryo quality but not pronuclear score is associated with clinical pregnancy following IVF.胚胎质量而非原核评分与体外受精后的临床妊娠相关。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2014 Mar;31(3):279-83. doi: 10.1007/s10815-013-0162-3. Epub 2014 Jan 5.
9
The use of a detailed zygote score after IVF/ICSI to obtain good quality blastocysts: the German experience.体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射后使用详细的受精卵评分以获得优质囊胚:德国的经验
Hum Reprod. 2002 May;17(5):1327-33. doi: 10.1093/humrep/17.5.1327.
10
Pronuclear scoring as a predictor of embryo development.原核评分作为胚胎发育的预测指标。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2003 Mar;6(2):201-14. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)61711-7.

引用本文的文献

1
The kinetics of nucleolar precursor bodies clustering at the pronuclei interface: Positive correlations with the morphokinetic characteristics of cleaving embryos and euploidy in preimplantation genetic testing programs.原核界面处核仁前体聚集的动力学:与卵裂期胚胎的形态动力学特征及植入前基因检测程序中的整倍体呈正相关。
Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2025 Jun;52(2):150-156. doi: 10.5653/cerm.2024.06926. Epub 2024 Oct 10.
2
Label-free evaluation of mouse embryo quality using time-lapse bright field and optical coherence microscopy.使用延时明场和光学相干显微镜对小鼠胚胎质量进行无标记评估。
Commun Biol. 2025 Apr 15;8(1):612. doi: 10.1038/s42003-025-08044-5.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy versus morphology as selection criteria for single frozen-thawed embryo transfer in good-prognosis patients: a multicenter randomized clinical trial.胚胎植入前遗传学检测非整倍体与形态学作为选择标准用于预后良好患者的单个冻融胚胎移植:一项多中心随机临床试验。
Fertil Steril. 2019 Dec;112(6):1071-1079.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.07.1346. Epub 2019 Sep 21.
2
Current status and future prospects of noninvasive preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy.非整倍体无创胚胎植入前基因检测的现状与未来展望
Fertil Steril. 2018 Aug;110(3):408-409. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.04.021.
3
Analysis of Clinical Outcomes of Different Fertilization Methods in Patients with ≤3 Eggs Retrieved.
≤3 枚获卵患者不同受精方式的临床结局分析。
J Healthc Eng. 2022 Mar 16;2022:9467568. doi: 10.1155/2022/9467568. eCollection 2022.
Time-lapse systems for embryo incubation and assessment in assisted reproduction.
辅助生殖中用于胚胎培养和评估的延时成像系统。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 25;5(5):CD011320. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011320.pub3.
4
Is mitochondrial DNA quantitation in blastocyst trophectoderm cells predictive of developmental competence and outcome in clinical IVF?囊胚滋养外胚层细胞中线粒体 DNA 定量是否可预测临床 IVF 的发育能力和结局?
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2017 Dec;34(12):1581-1585. doi: 10.1007/s10815-017-1072-6. Epub 2017 Oct 28.
5
Pronuclear morphology evaluation for fresh in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles: a systematic review.原核形态评估在新鲜体外受精(IVF)和胞浆内单精子注射(ICSI)周期中的应用:一项系统评价。
J Ovarian Res. 2013 Sep 12;6(1):64. doi: 10.1186/1757-2215-6-64.
6
The impact of pronuclei morphology and dynamicity on live birth outcome after time-lapse culture.原核形态和动态对延时培养后活产结局的影响。
Hum Reprod. 2012 Sep;27(9):2649-57. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des210. Epub 2012 Jun 26.
7
The Istanbul consensus workshop on embryo assessment: proceedings of an expert meeting.《伊斯坦布尔胚胎评估共识工作坊:专家会议记录》。
Hum Reprod. 2011 Jun;26(6):1270-83. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der037. Epub 2011 Apr 18.
8
Analysis of pronuclear zygote configurations in 459 clinical pregnancies obtained with assisted reproductive technique procedures.分析采用辅助生殖技术获得的 459 例临床妊娠的原核期受精卵形态。
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2010 Jun 25;8:77. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-8-77.
9
Pronuclear morphology differs between women more than 38 and women less than 30 years of age.38岁以上女性与30岁以下女性的原核形态存在差异。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2009 Mar;18(3):367-73. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60095-8.
10
Evaluation of day one embryo quality and IVF outcome--a comparison of two scoring systems.第一天胚胎质量评估与体外受精结局——两种评分系统的比较
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2009 Feb 3;7:9. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-7-9.