• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童身体活动育儿问卷(PAP-C)的结构效度和信度。

Construct validity and reliability of the physical activity parenting questionnaire for children (PAP-C).

作者信息

Laukkanen Arto, Aunola Kaisa, Korhonen Elisa, Barnett Lisa M, Sääkslahti Arja

机构信息

Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.

Department of Psychology, Faculty of Education and Psychology, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.

出版信息

Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 May 5;18(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01128-5.

DOI:10.1186/s12966-021-01128-5
PMID:33952304
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8097989/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Children's perception of parenting is hypothesised to significantly affect their physical activity (PA). This study aimed to examine construct validity, factorial invariance and reliability of a new tool: Physical Activity Parenting questionnaire for Children (PAP-C).

METHODS

PAP-C comprised 22 items hypothesised to cover 3 theory-guided factors of physical activity parenting (PAP)-namely, structure for activity, autonomy support and involvement. Construct validity and internal consistency of PAP-C were tested using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and composite reliability in a sample of Finnish first, second- and third graders (n = 456; mean age 8.77 ± 0.84 years, girls 51.1%). Factorial invariance of PAP-C across grade levels was investigated using sequential multigroup CFA. Intra-class correlation (ICC) coefficients of the sum factors were calculated in a sample of children who completed a 4-week PAP-C retest (n = 450; mean age 8.83 ± 0.87 years, girls 48.0%).

RESULTS

A first-order 3-factor model of the structure for activity, autonomy support and involvement, with 20 items (two items removed), showed an acceptable fit. The model demonstrated configural, metric, and scalar invariance across grade levels. Composite reliabilities indicated moderate-to-good internal consistency (from .74 to .87) for the factors. ICCs (from .494 to .750, p < .001) showed moderate to excellent test-retest stability for all grade levels.

CONCLUSIONS

PAP-C can be considered to be a promising tool for investigating 7-10-year-old children's perceptions of PAP.

摘要

背景

据推测,儿童对养育方式的认知会对其身体活动(PA)产生重大影响。本研究旨在检验一种新工具——儿童身体活动养育问卷(PAP-C)的结构效度、因素不变性和信度。

方法

PAP-C包含22个项目,据推测涵盖身体活动养育(PAP)的3个理论导向因素,即活动结构、自主支持和参与。在芬兰一、二、三年级学生样本(n = 456;平均年龄8.77±0.84岁,女孩占51.1%)中,使用验证性因素分析(CFA)和组合信度对PAP-C的结构效度和内部一致性进行了测试。使用序贯多组CFA研究了PAP-C在不同年级水平上的因素不变性。在完成4周PAP-C重测的儿童样本(n = 450;平均年龄8.83±0.87岁,女孩占48.0%)中计算了总因素的组内相关(ICC)系数。

结果

一个包含活动结构、自主支持和参与的一阶三因素模型,去掉两个项目后由20个项目组成,显示出可接受的拟合度。该模型在不同年级水平上表现出构型、度量和标量不变性。组合信度表明各因素的内部一致性从中度到良好(从0.74到0.87)。ICC(从0.494到0.750,p < 0.001)显示所有年级水平的重测稳定性从中度到优秀。

结论

PAP-C可被认为是一种用于调查7至10岁儿童对PAP认知的有前景的工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc5e/8097989/8d33e7ecd926/12966_2021_1128_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc5e/8097989/52c5a4cf5976/12966_2021_1128_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc5e/8097989/8d33e7ecd926/12966_2021_1128_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc5e/8097989/52c5a4cf5976/12966_2021_1128_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc5e/8097989/8d33e7ecd926/12966_2021_1128_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Construct validity and reliability of the physical activity parenting questionnaire for children (PAP-C).儿童身体活动育儿问卷(PAP-C)的结构效度和信度。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 May 5;18(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01128-5.
2
"It Is Like Compulsory to Go, but It Is still pretty Nice": Young Children's Views on Physical Activity Parenting and the Associated Motivational Regulation.“不得不去,但还挺不错的”:幼儿对身体活动养育的看法以及与之相关的动机调节。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 30;17(7):2315. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17072315.
3
Development of Physical Activity-Related Parenting Practices Scales for Urban Chinese Parents of Preschoolers: Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Reliability.发展与身体活动相关的育儿实践量表:城市学龄前儿童中国父母的验证性因素分析和信度。
J Phys Act Health. 2017 Sep;14(9):692-700. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2016-0704. Epub 2017 May 17.
4
Psychometrics of the preschooler physical activity parenting practices instrument among a Latino sample.拉丁裔样本中幼儿身体活动育儿实践工具的心理测量学
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014 Jan 15;11:3. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-11-3.
5
Test-retest reliability and construct validity of the ENERGY-parent questionnaire on parenting practices, energy balance-related behaviours and their potential behavioural determinants: the ENERGY-project.ENERGY 项目中关于育儿实践、能量平衡相关行为及其潜在行为决定因素的 ENERGY-父母问卷的重测信度和结构效度
BMC Res Notes. 2012 Aug 13;5:434. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-5-434.
6
Psychometric properties of the Portuguese version of the physical activity parenting practices questionnaire.《体力活动养育实践问卷》葡萄牙语版的心理测量学特性。
BMC Psychol. 2023 Nov 28;11(1):417. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01444-4.
7
The validity of the Physical Literacy in Children Questionnaire in children aged 4 to 12.《儿童身体素养问卷》在 4 至 12 岁儿童中的有效性。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Mar 21;24(1):869. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18343-x.
8
Assessing the validity and reliability of family factors on physical activity: A case study in Turkey.评估家庭因素对身体活动的有效性和可靠性:土耳其的案例研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 14;13(6):e0197920. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197920. eCollection 2018.
9
The Hausa 12-item short-form health survey (SF-12): Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation in mixed urban and rural Nigerian populations with chronic low back pain.《豪萨 12 项简短健康调查(SF-12)》:在患有慢性下腰痛的混合城乡尼日利亚人群中进行翻译、跨文化调适和验证。
PLoS One. 2020 May 7;15(5):e0232223. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232223. eCollection 2020.
10
The physical activity parenting practices (PAPP) item Bank: a psychometrically validated tool for improving the measurement of physical activity parenting practices of parents of 5-12-year-old children.体力活动养育实践(PAPP)项目库:一种经过心理测量验证的工具,用于改进对 5-12 岁儿童家长体力活动养育实践的测量。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Nov 4;17(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-01036-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Reliability and validity evidence for the physical activity parenting questionnaire for children (PAP-C) in Chinese school-aged children.中国学龄儿童体育活动育儿问卷(PAP-C)的信效度证据
Eur J Pediatr. 2025 Aug 18;184(9):561. doi: 10.1007/s00431-025-06413-0.
2
Parental and Peer Support Matters: A Broad Umbrella of the Role of Perceived Social Support in the Association between Children's Perceived Motor Competence and Physical Activity.父母和同伴支持很重要:感知社会支持在儿童感知运动能力与身体活动之间关系中的作用的一个广泛领域。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 21;18(12):6646. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18126646.

本文引用的文献

1
"It Is Like Compulsory to Go, but It Is still pretty Nice": Young Children's Views on Physical Activity Parenting and the Associated Motivational Regulation.“不得不去,但还挺不错的”:幼儿对身体活动养育的看法以及与之相关的动机调节。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 30;17(7):2315. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17072315.
2
Global physical activity levels - Need for intervention.全球身体活动水平——需要干预。
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2019 Mar-Apr;62(2):102-107. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2019.02.004. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
3
Global Matrix 3.0 Physical Activity Report Card Grades for Children and Youth: Results and Analysis From 49 Countries.
全球矩阵 3.0 儿童和青少年身体活动报告卡等级:来自 49 个国家的结果和分析。
J Phys Act Health. 2018 Nov 1;15(S2):S251-S273. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2018-0472.
4
Correlates of physical activity parenting: The Skilled Kids study.父母体育活动的相关因素:有技能的孩子研究。
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2018 Dec;28(12):2691-2701. doi: 10.1111/sms.13287. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
5
Exploring the effect of parental influence on children's physical activity: The mediating role of children's perceptions of parental support.探讨父母影响对儿童身体活动的影响:儿童对父母支持的感知的中介作用。
Prev Med. 2018 Jan;106:79-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.10.018. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
6
Bidirectional associations between activity-related parenting practices, and child physical activity, sedentary screen-based behavior and body mass index: a longitudinal analysis.与活动相关的育儿方式与儿童身体活动、久坐屏幕行为和体重指数之间的双向关联:一项纵向分析。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Jul 6;14(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0544-5.
7
Conceptualizing physical activity parenting practices using expert informed concept mapping analysis.运用专家知情概念图分析法对体育活动育儿实践进行概念化。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Jun 14;17(1):574. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4487-1.
8
Associations between sleep duration, sedentary time, physical activity, and health indicators among Canadian children and youth using compositional analyses.采用成分分析法对加拿大儿童和青少年的睡眠时间、久坐时间、身体活动与健康指标之间的关联进行研究。
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2016 Jun;41(6 Suppl 3):S294-302. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2016-0026.
9
Fundamental constructs in food parenting practices: a content map to guide future research.食物养育行为的基本构成要素:一份指导未来研究的内容图谱。
Nutr Rev. 2016 Feb;74(2):98-117. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuv061. Epub 2016 Jan 2.
10
Associations Between Maternal Support and Physical Activity Among 5th Grade Students.五年级学生中母亲支持与体育活动之间的关联
Matern Child Health J. 2016 Mar;20(3):720-9. doi: 10.1007/s10995-015-1873-0.