Povey Josie, Raphiphatthana Buaphrao, Torok Michelle, Nagel Tricia, Shand Fiona, Sweet Michelle, Lowell Anne, Mills Patj Patj Janama Robert, Dingwall Kylie
Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Ellengowan Drive, Darwin, Northern Territory, 0909, Australia.
University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, 2052, Australia.
Syst Rev. 2021 May 5;10(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01685-7.
Indigenous young people worldwide are at greater risk of developing mental health concerns due to ongoing inequity and disadvantage. Digital mental health (dMH) interventions are identified as a potential approach to improving access to mental health treatment for Indigenous youth. Although involvement in the development and evaluation of dMH resources is widely recommended, there is limited evidence to guide engagement of Indigenous young people in these processes. This scoping review aims to examine the methods used to involve Indigenous young people in the development or evaluation of dMH interventions.
Articles published in English, involving Indigenous young people (aged 10-24 years) in the development or evaluation of dMH interventions, originating from Australia, New Zealand, Canada and the USA will be eligible for inclusion. PubMed, Scopus and EBSCOhost databases (Academic Search Premiere, Computer and Applied Science complete, CINAHL, MEDLINE, APA PsychArticles, Psychology and Behavioural Sciences collection, APA PsychInfo) will be searched to identify eligible articles (from January 1990 onwards). Infomit and Google Scholar (limited to 200 results) will be searched for grey literature. Two reviewers will independently screen citations, abstracts and full-text articles. Study methods, methodologies, dMH intervention details, participant information and engagement, and dissemination methods will be extracted, analysed (utilising content analysis), and qualitatively assessed for alignment with best practice ethical guidelines for undertaking Indigenous health research. A narrative summary of findings will be presented. Reporting will follow the Consolidated Criteria for Strengthening Reporting of Health Research involving Indigenous peoples (CONSIDER) and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines.
To date, there are no reviews which analyse engagement of Indigenous young people in the development and evaluation of dMH interventions. This review will appraise alignment of current practice with best practice guidelines to inform future research. It will highlight appropriate methods for the engagement of young people in study processes, providing guidance for health practitioners, policy makers, and researchers working in the field of Indigenous youth and dMH.
Open Science Framework ( osf.io/2nkc6 ).
由于持续存在的不平等和不利状况，全球范围内的原住民年轻人患心理健康问题的风险更高。数字心理健康（dMH）干预措施被视为改善原住民青年获得心理健康治疗机会的一种潜在方法。尽管广泛建议让原住民年轻人参与dMH资源的开发和评估，但指导他们参与这些过程的证据有限。本范围综述旨在研究让原住民年轻人参与dMH干预措施开发或评估所使用的方法。
以英文发表的、涉及澳大利亚、新西兰、加拿大和美国原住民年轻人（10 - 24岁）参与dMH干预措施开发或评估的文章将符合纳入标准。将检索PubMed、Scopus和EBSCOhost数据库（学术搜索大全、计算机与应用科学全文数据库、护理学与健康领域数据库、医学期刊数据库、美国心理学会心理学文摘数据库、心理学与行为科学数据库、美国心理学会心理学数据库）以识别符合条件的文章（从1990年1月起）。将检索Infomit和谷歌学术（限于200条结果）以查找灰色文献。两名评审员将独立筛选文献引用、摘要和全文文章。将提取、分析（采用内容分析法）研究方法、方法论、dMH干预措施细节、参与者信息与参与情况以及传播方法，并根据开展原住民健康研究的最佳实践伦理准则进行定性评估。将呈现研究结果的叙述性总结。报告将遵循《加强涉及原住民健康研究报告的综合标准》（CONSIDER）以及《系统评价与Meta分析优先报告项目扩展版：范围综述》（PRISMA - ScR）指南。
迄今为止，尚无分析原住民年轻人参与dMH干预措施开发和评估情况的综述。本综述将评估当前实践与最佳实践指南的一致性，为未来研究提供参考。它将突出年轻人参与研究过程的适当方法，为从事原住民青年和dMH领域工作的健康从业者、政策制定者和研究人员提供指导。
开放科学框架（osf.io/2nkc6）
