• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

认知测试分数因个人数字设备选择的不同而有所差异。

Cognitive test scores vary with choice of personal digital device.

机构信息

Institute for Technology in Psychiatry, McLean Hospital, Oaks Building, 115 Mill Street, Belmont, MA, 02478, USA.

Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Behav Res Methods. 2021 Dec;53(6):2544-2557. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01597-3. Epub 2021 May 5.

DOI:10.3758/s13428-021-01597-3
PMID:33954913
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8568735/
Abstract

Mobile- and web-based psychological research are a valuable addition to the set of tools available for scientific study, reducing logistical barriers for research participation and allowing the recruitment of larger and more diverse participant groups. However, this comes at the cost of reduced control over the technology used by participants, which can introduce new sources of variability into study results. In this study, we examined differences in measured performance on timed and untimed cognitive tests between users of common digital devices in 59,587 (Study 1) and 3818 (Study 2) visitors to TestMyBrain.org , a web-based cognitive testing platform. Controlling for age, gender, educational background, and cognitive performance on an untimed vocabulary test, users of mobile devices, particularly Android smartphones, showed significantly slower performance on tests of reaction time than users of laptop and desktop computers, suggesting that differences in device latency affect measured reaction times. Users of devices that differ in user interface (e.g. screen size, mouse vs. touchscreen) also show significant differences (p < 0.001) in measured performance on tests requiring fast reactions or fine motor movements. By quantifying the contribution of device differences to measured cognitive performance in an online setting, we hope to improve the accuracy of mobile- and web-based cognitive assessments, allowing these methods to be used more effectively.

摘要

移动和基于网络的心理学研究是科学研究工具集的有益补充,减少了研究参与的后勤障碍,并允许招募更大和更多样化的参与者群体。然而,这是以降低对参与者使用的技术的控制为代价的,这可能会给研究结果带来新的可变性来源。在这项研究中,我们研究了在 59587 名(研究 1)和 3818 名(研究 2)访问 TestMyBrain.org 的常见数字设备用户之间,定时和非定时认知测试的测量表现差异,TestMyBrain.org 是一个基于网络的认知测试平台。在控制年龄、性别、教育背景和非定时词汇测试的认知表现后,移动设备(特别是 Android 智能手机)的用户在反应时间测试上的表现明显慢于笔记本电脑和台式电脑的用户,这表明设备延迟的差异会影响测量的反应时间。用户界面不同的设备(例如屏幕大小、鼠标与触摸屏)在需要快速反应或精细运动的测试中的测量表现也存在显著差异(p<0.001)。通过量化设备差异对在线环境中测量认知表现的贡献,我们希望提高移动和基于网络的认知评估的准确性,从而更有效地使用这些方法。

相似文献

1
Cognitive test scores vary with choice of personal digital device.认知测试分数因个人数字设备选择的不同而有所差异。
Behav Res Methods. 2021 Dec;53(6):2544-2557. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01597-3. Epub 2021 May 5.
2
To BYOD or not: Are device latencies important for bring-your-own-device (BYOD) smartphone cognitive testing?是否采用自带设备(BYOD):设备延迟对于自带设备(BYOD)智能手机认知测试重要吗?
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Sep;55(6):2800-2812. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01925-1. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
3
StimuliApp: Psychophysical tests on mobile devices.StimuliApp:移动设备上的心理物理学测试。
Behav Res Methods. 2021 Jun;53(3):1301-1307. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01491-4. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
4
Understanding Barriers and Facilitators to Signing Up for a Mobile-Responsive Registry to Recruit Healthy Volunteers and Members of Underrepresented Communities for Alzheimer's Disease Prevention Studies.了解健康志愿者和代表性不足社区成员报名参加移动响应注册以参与阿尔茨海默病预防研究的障碍和促进因素。
J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2023;10(4):865-874. doi: 10.14283/jpad.2023.67.
5
Handheld vs. laptop computers for electronic data collection in clinical research: a crossover randomized trial.手持式电脑与膝上型电脑用于临床研究中的电子数据采集:一项交叉随机试验。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009 Sep-Oct;16(5):651-9. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M3041. Epub 2009 Jun 30.
6
A systematic review of mobile device use in the primary school classroom and impact on pupil literacy and numeracy attainment: A systematic review.对小学课堂中移动设备使用情况及其对学生读写和算术能力影响的系统评价:一项系统评价。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 20;20(2):e1417. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1417. eCollection 2024 Jun.
7
Ocular and visual discomfort associated with smartphones, tablets and computers: what we do and do not know.与智能手机、平板电脑和电脑相关的眼部及视觉不适:我们所知道和不知道的情况。
Clin Exp Optom. 2019 Sep;102(5):463-477. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12851. Epub 2019 Jan 21.
8
A mixed-method research to investigate the adoption of mobile devices and Web2.0 technologies among medical students and educators.一项混合方法研究,旨在调查医学生和教育工作者对移动设备和Web2.0技术的采用情况。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016 Apr 19;16:43. doi: 10.1186/s12911-016-0283-6.
9
Enhancement of Neurocognitive Assessments Using Smartphone Capabilities: Systematic Review.利用智能手机功能增强神经认知评估:系统评价。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Jun 24;8(6):e15517. doi: 10.2196/15517.
10
MotorBrain: A mobile app for the assessment of users' motor performance in neurology.运动大脑:一款用于评估神经科用户运动表现的移动应用程序。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2017 May;143:35-47. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2017.02.012. Epub 2017 Feb 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Emotion identification and emotion sensitivity following interpersonal and non-interpersonal traumatic experiences: Results from the AURORA study.人际和非人际创伤经历后的情绪识别与情绪敏感性:奥罗拉研究结果
Clin Psychol Sci. 2025 Aug 16. doi: 10.1177/21677026251356428.
2
Exploring the relationship between mean performance and within-person variability on smartphone-based cognitive testing in adults across the lifespan.探索成年人一生中基于智能手机的认知测试中平均表现与个体内部变异性之间的关系。
NPP Digit Psychiatry Neurosci. 2025;3(1):15. doi: 10.1038/s44277-025-00036-x. Epub 2025 Jun 19.
3
Digital questionnaire response time (DQRT): A ubiquitous and low-cost digital assay of cognitive processing speed.

本文引用的文献

1
Conducting perception research over the internet: a tutorial review.通过互联网进行感知研究:教程综述
PeerJ. 2015 Jul 23;3:e1058. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1058. eCollection 2015.
2
When does cognitive functioning peak? The asynchronous rise and fall of different cognitive abilities across the life span.认知功能何时达到顶峰?不同认知能力在整个生命周期中的异步起伏。
Psychol Sci. 2015 Apr;26(4):433-43. doi: 10.1177/0956797614567339. Epub 2015 Mar 13.
3
Internet research in psychology.心理学中的网络研究。
数字问卷响应时间(DQRT):一种普遍存在且低成本的认知处理速度数字检测方法。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Jun 17;57(7):200. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02727-x.
4
Investigating Measurement Equivalence of Smartphone Sensor-Based Assessments: Remote, Digital, Bring-Your-Own-Device Study.调查基于智能手机传感器评估的测量等效性:远程、数字、自带设备研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 3;27:e63090. doi: 10.2196/63090.
5
No Evidence of Reliability Across 36 Variations of the Emotional Dot-Probe Task in 9,600 Participants.在9600名参与者中,未发现情绪点探测任务的36种变体具有可靠性证据。
Clin Psychol Sci. 2025 Mar;13(2):261-277. doi: 10.1177/21677026241253826. Epub 2024 Jun 13.
6
Normative face recognition ability test scores vary across online participant pools.规范性人脸识别能力测试分数在不同的在线参与者群体中有所不同。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 14;15(1):8805. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-92907-8.
7
Mayo Normative Studies: regression-based normative data for remote self-administration of the Stricker Learning Span, Symbols Test, and Mayo Test Drive Screening Battery Composite and validation in individuals with mild cognitive impairment and dementia.梅奥规范研究:基于回归的规范数据,用于Stricker学习跨度、符号测试和梅奥试驾筛查组合的远程自我管理,以及在轻度认知障碍和痴呆症患者中的验证。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2025 Mar 11:1-30. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2025.2469340.
8
ATN blood biomarkers are related to digital cognitive assessment in type 1 diabetes.急性肾小管坏死血液生物标志物与1型糖尿病的数字认知评估相关。
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2024 Oct 23;16(4):e70029. doi: 10.1002/dad2.70029. eCollection 2024 Oct-Dec.
9
Mayo Normative Studies: regression-based normative data for remote self-administration of the Stricker Learning Span, Symbols Test and Mayo Test Drive Screening Battery Composite and validation in individuals with Mild Cognitive Impairment and dementia.梅奥规范性研究:基于回归的Stricker学习跨度、符号测试和梅奥试驾筛查组合远程自我管理的规范性数据,以及在轻度认知障碍和痴呆症患者中的验证。
medRxiv. 2024 Sep 16:2024.09.14.24313641. doi: 10.1101/2024.09.14.24313641.
10
A jsPsych touchscreen extension for behavioral research on touch-enabled interfaces.用于触摸界面的行为研究的 jsPsych 触摸屏扩展。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Oct;56(7):7814-7830. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02454-9. Epub 2024 Jul 12.
Annu Rev Psychol. 2015 Jan 3;66:877-902. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015321. Epub 2014 Sep 22.
4
Social anhedonia is associated with neural abnormalities during face emotion processing.社交快感缺失与面孔情绪处理过程中的神经异常有关。
Neuroimage. 2011 Oct 1;58(3):935-45. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.059. Epub 2011 Jun 30.
5
Does variability in human performance outweigh imprecision in response devices such as computer keyboards?在人类表现的变异性与诸如计算机键盘这类响应设备的不精确性之间,哪个更大?
Behav Res Methods. 2010 Feb;42(1):205-11. doi: 10.3758/BRM.42.1.205.
6
Reaction times and performance variability in normal aging, mild cognitive impairment, and Alzheimer's disease.正常衰老、轻度认知障碍和阿尔茨海默病中的反应时间与表现变异性。
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2008 Sep;21(3):204-18. doi: 10.1177/0891988708320973.
7
Administration and interpretation of the Trail Making Test.连线测验的实施与解读
Nat Protoc. 2006;1(5):2277-81. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2006.390.
8
Age and sex differences in reaction time in adulthood: results from the United Kingdom Health and Lifestyle Survey.成年期反应时间的年龄和性别差异:来自英国健康与生活方式调查的结果。
Psychol Aging. 2006 Mar;21(1):62-73. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.21.1.62.
9
Speed and memory in the WAIS-III Digit Symbol--Coding subtest across the adult lifespan.韦氏成人智力量表第三版数字符号-编码分测验中,成年人整个生命周期内的速度与记忆情况。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2004 Sep;19(6):759-67. doi: 10.1016/j.acn.2003.09.009.
10
Psychological research online: report of Board of Scientific Affairs' Advisory Group on the Conduct of Research on the Internet.《在线心理学研究:科学事务委员会互联网研究行为咨询小组报告》
Am Psychol. 2004 Feb-Mar;59(2):105-17. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.59.2.105.