• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

个体既往自杀未遂者的个人谷歌搜索记录对检测自杀未遂相关数据模式的感知效用和特征描述:初步队列研究。

Perceived Utility and Characterization of Personal Google Search Histories to Detect Data Patterns Proximal to a Suicide Attempt in Individuals Who Previously Attempted Suicide: Pilot Cohort Study.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.

ALACRITY Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2021 May 6;23(5):e27918. doi: 10.2196/27918.

DOI:10.2196/27918
PMID:33955838
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8138707/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite decades of research to better understand suicide risk and to develop detection and prevention methods, suicide is still one of the leading causes of death globally. While large-scale studies using real-world evidence from electronic health records can identify who is at risk, they have not been successful at pinpointing when someone is at risk. Personalized social media and online search history data, by contrast, could provide an ongoing real-world datastream revealing internal thoughts and personal states of mind.

OBJECTIVE

We conducted this study to determine the feasibility and acceptability of using personalized online information-seeking behavior in the identification of risk for suicide attempts.

METHODS

This was a cohort survey study to assess attitudes of participants with a prior suicide attempt about using web search data for suicide prevention purposes, dates of lifetime suicide attempts, and an optional one-time download of their past web searches on Google. The study was conducted at the University of Washington School of Medicine Psychiatry Research Offices. The main outcomes were participants' opinions on internet search data for suicide prediction and intervention and any potential change in online information-seeking behavior proximal to a suicide attempt. Individualized nonparametric association analysis was used to assess the magnitude of difference in web search data features derived from time periods proximal (7, 15, 30, and 60 days) to the suicide attempts versus the typical (baseline) search behavior of participants.

RESULTS

A total of 62 participants who had attempted suicide in the past agreed to participate in the study. Internet search activity varied from person to person (median 2-24 searches per day). Changes in online search behavior proximal to suicide attempts were evident up to 60 days before attempt. For a subset of attempts (7/30, 23%) search features showed associations from 2 months to a week before the attempt. The top 3 search constructs associated with attempts were online searching patterns (9/30 attempts, 30%), semantic relatedness of search queries to suicide methods (7/30 attempts, 23%), and anger (7/30 attempts, 23%). Participants (40/59, 68%) indicated that use of this personalized web search data for prevention purposes was acceptable with noninvasive potential interventions such as connection to a real person (eg, friend, family member, or counselor); however, concerns were raised about detection accuracy, privacy, and the potential for overly invasive intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Changes in online search behavior may be a useful and acceptable means of detecting suicide risk. Personalized analysis of online information-seeking behavior showed notable changes in search behavior and search terms that are tied to early warning signs of suicide and are evident 2 months to 7 days before a suicide attempt.

摘要

背景

尽管几十年来一直在研究自杀风险,以开发检测和预防方法,但自杀仍然是全球主要的死亡原因之一。虽然使用电子健康记录中的真实世界证据进行的大规模研究可以确定哪些人有风险,但它们并不能准确确定某人何时有风险。相比之下,个性化的社交媒体和在线搜索历史数据可以提供一个持续的真实世界数据流,揭示内部想法和个人心理状态。

目的

我们进行这项研究是为了确定使用个性化在线信息搜索行为来识别自杀企图风险的可行性和可接受性。

方法

这是一项队列调查研究,旨在评估有自杀未遂史的参与者对使用网络搜索数据进行自杀预防目的的态度、一生中自杀尝试的日期以及可选的一次性下载他们过去在谷歌上的搜索记录。该研究在华盛顿大学医学院精神病学研究办公室进行。主要结果是参与者对互联网搜索数据进行自杀预测和干预的看法,以及在自杀企图发生前的近期是否存在任何在线信息搜索行为的变化。使用非参数关联分析来评估从自杀尝试前 7、15、30 和 60 天(近端)到参与者典型(基线)搜索行为的时间段内,源自网络搜索数据特征的差异幅度。

结果

共有 62 名过去曾试图自杀的参与者同意参与研究。个人的互联网搜索活动各不相同(中位数每天 2-24 次搜索)。在自杀尝试前的 60 天内,就可以明显看出在线搜索行为的变化。对于部分尝试(7/30,23%),从尝试前 2 个月到 1 周内就显示出与搜索特征的关联。与尝试相关的前 3 个搜索结构是在线搜索模式(9/30 次尝试,30%)、搜索查询与自杀方法的语义相关性(7/30 次尝试,23%)和愤怒(7/30 次尝试,23%)。40/59 名参与者(68%)表示,使用这种个性化的网络搜索数据进行预防目的是可以接受的,并且可以进行非侵入性的潜在干预,例如与真实的人(例如朋友、家人或顾问)联系;但是,对检测准确性、隐私性和过度侵入性干预的可能性表示担忧。

结论

在线搜索行为的变化可能是一种有用且可接受的检测自杀风险的方法。个性化分析在线信息搜索行为显示,搜索行为和搜索词发生了显著变化,这些变化与自杀的预警信号有关,并且在自杀企图前 2 个月到 7 天内就已经明显。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35a6/8138707/4f62c0040034/jmir_v23i5e27918_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35a6/8138707/56280870e776/jmir_v23i5e27918_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35a6/8138707/9843f3af2329/jmir_v23i5e27918_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35a6/8138707/611bb576e9bb/jmir_v23i5e27918_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35a6/8138707/4f62c0040034/jmir_v23i5e27918_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35a6/8138707/56280870e776/jmir_v23i5e27918_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35a6/8138707/9843f3af2329/jmir_v23i5e27918_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35a6/8138707/611bb576e9bb/jmir_v23i5e27918_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35a6/8138707/4f62c0040034/jmir_v23i5e27918_fig4.jpg

相似文献

1
Perceived Utility and Characterization of Personal Google Search Histories to Detect Data Patterns Proximal to a Suicide Attempt in Individuals Who Previously Attempted Suicide: Pilot Cohort Study.个体既往自杀未遂者的个人谷歌搜索记录对检测自杀未遂相关数据模式的感知效用和特征描述:初步队列研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 May 6;23(5):e27918. doi: 10.2196/27918.
2
Google Trends: Ready for real-time suicide prevention or just a Zeta-Jones effect? An exploratory study.谷歌趋势:准备好实时预防自杀,还是只是泽塔-琼斯效应?一项探索性研究。
Psychiatry Res. 2015 Aug 30;228(3):913-7. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2015.04.022. Epub 2015 Apr 28.
3
Evaluation of the Feasibility of Screening Patients for Early Signs of Lung Carcinoma in Web Search Logs.评估在网络搜索日志中筛查肺癌早期迹象患者的可行性。
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Mar 1;3(3):398-401. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.4911.
4
Association Between Prosuicide Website Searches Through Google and Suicide Death in the United States From 2010 to 2021: Lagged Time-Series Analysis.2010 年至 2021 年美国通过谷歌进行的自杀网站搜索与自杀死亡的关联性:滞后时间序列分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jul 26;26:e53404. doi: 10.2196/53404.
5
Global google trends for construction demonstrate low search volume index for stress, mental and suicide.全球谷歌趋势显示,建筑行业的压力、心理健康和自杀相关搜索量指数较低。
BMC Res Notes. 2023 Dec 19;16(1):374. doi: 10.1186/s13104-023-06628-0.
6
Comparative analysis of online health queries originating from personal computers and smart devices on a consumer health information portal.消费者健康信息门户网站上源自个人电脑和智能设备的在线健康查询的比较分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Jul 4;16(7):e160. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3186.
7
Tracking search engine queries for suicide in the United Kingdom, 2004-2013.2004年至2013年英国自杀相关搜索引擎查询记录追踪
Public Health. 2016 Aug;137:147-53. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2015.10.015. Epub 2016 Mar 11.
8
The Impact of a Highly Publicized Celebrity Suicide on Suicide-Related Online Information Seeking.名人自杀事件对与自杀相关的在线信息搜索的影响
Crisis. 2017 May;38(3):207-209. doi: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000455. Epub 2017 Mar 24.
9
Searching for Suicide Methods: Accessibility of Information About Helium as a Method of Suicide on the Internet.寻找自杀方法:互联网上关于氦气作为自杀手段的信息可及性
Crisis. 2015;36(5):325-31. doi: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000326.
10
Google Searches and Suicide Rates in Spain, 2004-2013: Correlation Study.Google 搜索与西班牙 2004-2013 年自杀率的相关性研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Apr 13;6(2):e10919. doi: 10.2196/10919.

引用本文的文献

1
Characteristics of Suicidal Patients Who Engaged in Suicide-Related Internet Use in the United Kingdom: Cross-Sectional Survey Findings.英国有自杀相关网络行为的自杀患者特征:横断面调查结果
JMIR Ment Health. 2025 Sep 5;12:e73702. doi: 10.2196/73702.
2
Rethinking suicide related searches and their association with suicide rates, attempts, and self harm hospitalisation.重新审视与自杀相关的搜索及其与自杀率、自杀未遂和自残住院率的关联。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Aug 29;8(1):558. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01916-4.
3
The ethical imperative of self-directed tools in crisis helplines to prevent suicide at scale.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical state tracking in serious mental illness through computational analysis of speech.通过计算分析言语对严重精神疾病进行临床状态跟踪。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 15;15(1):e0225695. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225695. eCollection 2020.
2
Contemporary Views of Research Participant Willingness to Participate and Share Digital Data in Biomedical Research.当代视角下的生物医学研究中研究参与者参与和分享数字数据的意愿。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Nov 1;2(11):e1915717. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.15717.
3
Preventing Suicide Among Working-Age Adults: The Correlates of Help-Seeking Behavior.
危机求助热线中用于大规模预防自杀的自主工具的伦理要求。
Nat Ment Health. 2025 Mar;3(3):269-270. doi: 10.1038/s44220-025-00384-9. Epub 2025 Jan 31.
4
Google searches for alcohol and association with alcohol-related outpatient encounters before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.在新冠疫情之前及期间,谷歌上关于酒精以及与酒精相关的门诊就诊情况的搜索。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 30;15(1):27750. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-13606-y.
5
Concurrent Validity of Digital Measures of Psychological Dimensions Associated with Suicidality Using AuxiliApp.使用AuxiliApp对与自杀倾向相关的心理维度数字测量的同时效度
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jun 26;15(7):868. doi: 10.3390/bs15070868.
6
Exploring Suicide-Related Internet Use Among Suicidal Mental Health Patients in the United Kingdom: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study.英国自杀倾向心理健康患者中与自杀相关的网络使用情况探索:横断面问卷调查研究
JMIR Ment Health. 2025 Jul 8;12:e70458. doi: 10.2196/70458.
7
Promises and Pitfalls of Internet Search Data in Mental Health: Critical Review.心理健康领域互联网搜索数据的前景与隐患:批判性综述
JMIR Ment Health. 2025 Feb 18;12:e60754. doi: 10.2196/60754.
8
Harnessing Internet Search Data as a Potential Tool for Medical Diagnosis: Literature Review.利用互联网搜索数据作为医学诊断的潜在工具:文献综述
JMIR Ment Health. 2025 Feb 11;12:e63149. doi: 10.2196/63149.
9
The Effect of Explicit Suicide Language in Engagement With a Suicide Prevention Search Page Help-Seeking Prompt: Nonrandomized Trial.明确自杀语言在与预防自杀搜索页面求助提示互动中的影响:非随机试验。
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Mar 19;11:e50283. doi: 10.2196/50283.
10
Identifying opportunities for informatics-supported suicide prevention: the case of Caring Contacts.识别信息学支持的自杀预防机会:以 Caring Contacts 为例。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2023 Apr 29;2022:309-318. eCollection 2022.
预防工作年龄成年人自杀:求助行为的相关因素
Inquiry. 2019 Jan-Dec;56:46958019850979. doi: 10.1177/0046958019850979.
4
Prediction Models for Suicide Attempts and Deaths: A Systematic Review and Simulation.自杀企图和死亡预测模型:系统评价与模拟。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2019 Jun 1;76(6):642-651. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.0174.
5
Google search histories of patients presenting to an emergency department: an observational study.患者在急诊科就诊时的谷歌搜索记录:一项观察性研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 20;9(2):e024791. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024791.
6
Effect of Augmenting Standard Care for Military Personnel With Brief Caring Text Messages for Suicide Prevention: A Randomized Clinical Trial.增强标准护理并为军人提供预防自杀的简短关怀短信对其的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2019 May 1;76(5):474-483. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.4530.
7
How Search Engine Data Enhance the Understanding of Determinants of Suicide in India and Inform Prevention: Observational Study.搜索引擎数据如何增进对印度自杀决定因素的理解并为预防工作提供信息:观察性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jan 4;21(1):e10179. doi: 10.2196/10179.
8
The dynamics of social support among suicide attempters: A smartphone-based daily diary study.自杀未遂者社会支持的动态变化:基于智能手机的日常日记研究。
Behav Res Ther. 2019 Sep;120:103348. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2018.11.016. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
9
Natural Language Processing of Social Media as Screening for Suicide Risk.社交媒体的自然语言处理用于自杀风险筛查。
Biomed Inform Insights. 2018 Aug 27;10:1178222618792860. doi: 10.1177/1178222618792860. eCollection 2018.
10
A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality versus Enhanced Care as Usual With Suicidal Soldiers.一项针对自杀倾向士兵的自杀行为协作评估与管理与强化常规护理对比的随机对照试验。
Psychiatry. 2017 Winter;80(4):339-356. doi: 10.1080/00332747.2017.1354607.