• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

灵敏度分析与提高城市固体废物生命周期评估中的回收利用率:以拉丁美洲发展中国家为例。

Sensitivity analysis and improvements of the recycling rate in municipal solid waste life cycle assessment: Focus on a Latin American developing context.

机构信息

Department of Theoretical and Applied Sciences, University of Insubria, Varese 21100, Italy.

COOPI - Cooperazione Internazionale, Milano 20151, Italy.

出版信息

Waste Manag. 2021 Jun 1;128:1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.04.043. Epub 2021 May 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.wasman.2021.04.043
PMID:33957429
Abstract

The life cycle assessment (LCA) of municipal solid waste (MSW) systems in developing countries is a matter of research. Obtain reliable results is challenging since field data and local databases are not always available. The research presented in this paper explores this issue in La Paz (Bolivia), where six environmental impact categories were assessed. The LCA, related to the formal MSW management system of the city, involves a sensitivity analysis of ten parameters and the scenario assessment in relation to the increase of the recycling rate. Results report that the environmental impacts are mostly sensitive in relation to landfill gas collection efficiency, use of plastic bags, the transportation distances of collected waste, and the replacement rate of virgin materials. Global warming potential is the impact category most variable (341.38-551.95 kg CO-eq t), although it is not considerably reduced by recycling, which contributed mostly to the human toxicity and freshwater aquatic ecotoxicity. Doubling the amount of MSW recycled, from 235 t to about 473 t per year, human toxicity potential reduces of about 18% while freshwater aquatic ecotoxicity of about 12%. This research contributes for evaluating the most sensitive parameters in an MSW-LCA and to support policymakers towards waste recycling and sustainable development in Latin America developing cities.

摘要

发展中国家城市固体废物(MSW)系统的生命周期评估(LCA)是一个研究课题。由于缺乏现场数据和本地数据库,获取可靠的结果具有挑战性。本文在玻利维亚拉巴斯进行了相关研究,评估了六个环境影响类别。该 LCA 与该市正规 MSW 管理系统相关,涉及对十个参数的灵敏度分析,以及与回收利用率增加相关的情景评估。结果表明,垃圾填埋气收集效率、塑料袋使用、收集废物的运输距离和原生材料的替代率等与土地填埋场气体收集效率、塑料袋使用、收集废物的运输距离和原生材料的替代率等参数对环境影响最为敏感。全球变暖潜势是变化最大的影响类别(341.38-551.95 kg CO-eq t),尽管回收利用率的提高并没有显著降低这一影响,而回收利用率的提高主要对人类毒性和淡水水生生态毒性有影响。将 MSW 的回收量增加一倍,从每年 235 吨增加到约 473 吨,人类毒性潜在减少约 18%,而淡水水生生态毒性减少约 12%。本研究有助于评估 MSW-LCA 中最敏感的参数,并为拉丁美洲发展中国家的决策者提供支持,以促进废物回收和可持续发展。

相似文献

1
Sensitivity analysis and improvements of the recycling rate in municipal solid waste life cycle assessment: Focus on a Latin American developing context.灵敏度分析与提高城市固体废物生命周期评估中的回收利用率:以拉丁美洲发展中国家为例。
Waste Manag. 2021 Jun 1;128:1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.04.043. Epub 2021 May 3.
2
Comparison of environmental impacts related to municipal solid waste and construction and demolition waste management and recycling in a Latin American developing city.拉丁美洲一个发展中城市中与城市固体废物、建筑和拆除废物管理及回收相关的环境影响比较。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jan;30(4):8548-8562. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16968-8. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
3
Developing a carbon footprint model and environmental impact analysis of municipal solid waste transportation: A case study of Tehran, Iran.开发城市固体废物运输的碳足迹模型和环境影响分析:以伊朗德黑兰为例。
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2023 Dec;73(12):890-901. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2023.2271424. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
4
Closing the gap in the municipal solid waste management between metropolitan and regional cities from developing countries: A life cycle assessment approach.缩小发展中国家大都市和区域城市间的城市固体废物管理差距:生命周期评估方法。
Waste Manag. 2021 Apr 1;124:314-324. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.02.020. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
5
Environmental impact assessment of municipal solid waste management options using life cycle assessment: a case study.运用生命周期评估方法对城市固体废物管理方案的环境影响评估:案例研究。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Jan;25(1):838-854. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-0439-7. Epub 2017 Oct 23.
6
Life cycle assessment of potential municipal solid waste management strategies for Mumbai, India.印度孟买潜在城市固体废物管理策略的生命周期评估
Waste Manag Res. 2017 Jan;35(1):79-91. doi: 10.1177/0734242X16675683. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
7
Application of a life cycle assessment for assessing municipal solid waste management systems in Bolivia in an international cooperative framework.在国际合作框架下,应用生命周期评估方法评估玻利维亚的城市固体废物管理系统。
Waste Manag Res. 2020 May;38(1_suppl):98-116. doi: 10.1177/0734242X20906250. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
8
Optimization of municipal solid waste collection routes in a Latin-American context.拉丁美洲背景下的城市固体废物收集路线优化。
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2021 Nov;71(11):1415-1427. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2021.1957040. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
9
Assessing the environmental sustainability of energy recovery from municipal solid waste in the UK.评估英国城市固体废物能源回收的环境可持续性。
Waste Manag. 2016 Apr;50:346-63. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.02.010. Epub 2016 Feb 20.
10
Application of life cycle assessment for municipal solid waste management options in Hohhot, People's Republic of China.生命周期评估在中华人民共和国呼和浩特市城市固体废物管理方案中的应用。
Waste Manag Res. 2021 Jan;39(1):63-72. doi: 10.1177/0734242X20959709. Epub 2020 Sep 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Use of life cycle assessment for estimating impacts of waste-to-energy technologies in solid waste management systems: the case of Buenos Aires, Argentina.利用生命周期评估估算固体废物管理系统中能源回收技术的影响:以阿根廷布宜诺斯艾利斯为例。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Feb;31(7):9992-10012. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-29641-z. Epub 2023 Sep 12.
2
A review of plastic waste circular actions in seven developing countries to achieve sustainable development goals.七国塑料废弃物循环行动述评,以实现可持续发展目标。
Waste Manag Res. 2024 Jun;42(6):436-458. doi: 10.1177/0734242X231188664. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
3
Organic waste valorization in remote islands: Analysis of economic and environmental benefits of onsite treatment options.
偏远岛屿的有机废物增值利用:现场处理方案的经济和环境效益分析。
Waste Manag Res. 2023 Apr;41(4):881-893. doi: 10.1177/0734242X221126426. Epub 2022 Oct 27.