• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用机器学习从计算机断层灌注成像预测急性缺血性梗死核心:来自 ISLES 挑战赛的经验教训。

Predicting Infarct Core From Computed Tomography Perfusion in Acute Ischemia With Machine Learning: Lessons From the ISLES Challenge.

机构信息

University Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Bern University Hospital, Inselspital (A.H., R.W.), University of Bern, Switzerland.

Stanford Stroke Center, Palo Alto, CA (S.C., M.G.L.).

出版信息

Stroke. 2021 Jul;52(7):2328-2337. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.030696. Epub 2021 May 7.

DOI:10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.030696
PMID:33957774
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8240494/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The ISLES challenge (Ischemic Stroke Lesion Segmentation) enables globally diverse teams to compete to develop advanced tools for stroke lesion analysis with machine learning. Detection of irreversibly damaged tissue on computed tomography perfusion (CTP) is often necessary to determine eligibility for late-time-window thrombectomy. Therefore, the aim of ISLES-2018 was to segment infarcted tissue on CTP based on diffusion-weighted imaging as a reference standard.

METHODS

The data, from 4 centers, consisted of 103 cases of acute anterior circulation large artery occlusion stroke who underwent diffusion-weighted imaging rapidly after CTP. Diffusion-weighted imaging lesion segmentation was performed manually and acted as a reference standard. The data were separated into 63 cases for training and 40 for testing, upon which quality metrics (dice score coefficient, Hausdorff distance, absolute lesion volume difference, etc) were computed to rank methods based on their overall performance.

RESULTS

Twenty-four different teams participated in the challenge. Median time to CTP was 185 minutes (interquartile range, 180-238), the time between CTP and magnetic resonance imaging was 36 minutes (interquartile range, 25-79), and the median infarct lesion size was 15.2 mL (interquartile range, 5.7-45). The best performance for Dice score coefficient and absolute volume difference were 0.51 and 10.1 mL, respectively, from different teams. Based on the ranking criteria, the top team's algorithm demonstrated for average Dice score coefficient and average absolute volume difference 0.51 and 10.2 mL, respectively, outperforming the conventional threshold-based method (dice score coefficient, 0.3; volume difference, 15.3). Diverse algorithms were used, almost all based on deep learning, with top-ranked approaches making use of the raw perfusion data as well as methods to synthetically generate complementary information to boost prediction performance.

CONCLUSIONS

Machine learning methods may predict infarcted tissue from CTP with improved accuracy compared with threshold-based methods used in clinical routine. This dataset will remain public and can be used to test improvement in algorithms over time.

摘要

背景与目的

ISLES 挑战赛(脑梗死灶分割)使来自全球不同地区的团队能够通过机器学习竞相开发用于卒中病灶分析的先进工具。在确定是否适合进行晚期时间窗取栓术时,通常需要在 CT 灌注(CTP)上检测不可逆损伤组织。因此,ISLES-2018 的目标是基于弥散加权成像(DWI)作为参考标准,对 CTP 上的梗死组织进行分割。

方法

该研究的数据来自 4 个中心的 103 例急性前循环大血管闭塞性卒中患者,这些患者在 CTP 后迅速进行 DWI 检查。手动进行 DWI 病变分割,并作为参考标准。数据分为 63 例用于训练,40 例用于测试,然后计算质量指标(Dice 评分系数、Hausdorff 距离、绝对病变体积差异等),根据整体性能对方法进行排名。

结果

共有 24 个不同的团队参加了挑战赛。CTP 的中位时间为 185 分钟(四分位距,180-238),CTP 与磁共振成像之间的时间为 36 分钟(四分位距,25-79),中位梗死病变大小为 15.2ml(四分位距,5.7-45)。不同团队的 Dice 评分系数和绝对体积差异的最佳性能分别为 0.51 和 10.1ml。根据排名标准,排名最高的团队的算法在平均 Dice 评分系数和平均绝对体积差异方面的表现分别为 0.51 和 10.2ml,优于传统的基于阈值的方法(Dice 评分系数为 0.3,体积差异为 15.3ml)。使用了多种算法,几乎都是基于深度学习的,排名靠前的方法利用了原始灌注数据以及生成补充信息的方法,以提高预测性能。

结论

与临床常规中使用的基于阈值的方法相比,机器学习方法可能更准确地预测 CTP 上的梗死组织。该数据集将保持公开,可用于测试算法随时间的改进。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/552b/8240494/b9c999bb2faf/str-52-2328-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/552b/8240494/db366da93030/str-52-2328-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/552b/8240494/a0a16a1e7765/str-52-2328-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/552b/8240494/b9c999bb2faf/str-52-2328-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/552b/8240494/db366da93030/str-52-2328-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/552b/8240494/a0a16a1e7765/str-52-2328-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/552b/8240494/b9c999bb2faf/str-52-2328-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Predicting Infarct Core From Computed Tomography Perfusion in Acute Ischemia With Machine Learning: Lessons From the ISLES Challenge.利用机器学习从计算机断层灌注成像预测急性缺血性梗死核心:来自 ISLES 挑战赛的经验教训。
Stroke. 2021 Jul;52(7):2328-2337. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.030696. Epub 2021 May 7.
2
Volumetric and Spatial Accuracy of Computed Tomography Perfusion Estimated Ischemic Core Volume in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke.急性缺血性脑卒中患者 CT 灌注估计缺血核心容积的容量和空间准确性。
Stroke. 2018 Oct;49(10):2368-2375. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.020846.
3
Spatial accuracy of computed tomography perfusion to estimate the follow-up infarct on diffusion-weighted imaging after successful mechanical thrombectomy.成功机械取栓后 CT 灌注对弥散加权成像随访梗死的空间准确性评估。
BMC Neurol. 2023 Jan 20;23(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12883-023-03075-z.
4
Correction for Delay and Dispersion Results in More Accurate Cerebral Blood Flow Ischemic Core Measurement in Acute Stroke.校正延迟和弥散可提高急性脑卒中缺血核心区脑血流测量的准确性。
Stroke. 2018 Apr;49(4):924-930. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.019562. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
5
Time-Dependent Computed Tomographic Perfusion Thresholds for Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke.急性缺血性脑卒中患者的时间依赖性计算机断层扫描灌注阈值
Stroke. 2015 Dec;46(12):3390-7. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009250. Epub 2015 Oct 29.
6
Admission CT perfusion may overestimate initial infarct core: the ghost infarct core concept.入院时的CT灌注可能高估初始梗死核心:“幽灵梗死核心”概念。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2017 Jan;9(1):66-69. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012494. Epub 2016 Aug 26.
7
Single-Centre Experience with Patients Selection for Mechanical Thrombectomy Based on Automated Computed Tomography Perfusion Analysis-A Comparison with Computed TomographyCT Perfusion Thrombectomy Trials.基于自动计算机断层扫描灌注分析进行机械取栓患者选择的单中心经验——与计算机断层扫描灌注取栓试验的比较
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2019 Apr;28(4):1085-1092. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2018.12.041. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
8
Defining Ischemic Core in Acute Ischemic Stroke Using CT Perfusion: A Multiparametric Bayesian-Based Model.使用 CT 灌注定义急性缺血性脑卒中的缺血核心:一种基于多参数贝叶斯的模型。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2019 Sep;40(9):1491-1497. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6170. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
9
Ischemic Core and Hypoperfusion Volumes Correlate With Infarct Size 24 Hours After Randomization in DEFUSE 3.DEFUSE 3 研究 24 小时后随机分组时的缺血核心和低灌注容积与梗死体积相关。
Stroke. 2019 Mar;50(3):626-631. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.023177.
10
Initial experience with upfront arterial and perfusion imaging among ischemic stroke patients presenting within the 4.5-hour time window.在 4.5 小时时间窗内出现的缺血性脑卒中患者中进行的初始动脉成像和灌注成像经验。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014 Feb;23(2):220-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2012.12.008. Epub 2013 Jan 22.

引用本文的文献

1
DeepISLES: a clinically validated ischemic stroke segmentation model from the ISLES'22 challenge.DeepISLES:一个来自ISLES'22挑战赛的经过临床验证的缺血性中风分割模型。
Nat Commun. 2025 Aug 9;16(1):7357. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-62373-x.
2
Evolution of CT perfusion software in stroke imaging: from deconvolution to artificial intelligence.中风成像中CT灌注软件的发展:从去卷积到人工智能。
Eur Radiol. 2025 Jul 9. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11779-8.
3
Noise-induced self-supervised hybrid UNet transformer for ischemic stroke segmentation with limited data annotations.

本文引用的文献

1
Boundary loss for highly unbalanced segmentation.高度不平衡分割的边界损失。
Med Image Anal. 2021 Jan;67:101851. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2020.101851. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
2
Convolutional Neural Networks for Radiologic Images: A Radiologist's Guide.卷积神经网络在放射影像中的应用:放射科医师指南。
Radiology. 2019 Mar;290(3):590-606. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018180547. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
3
Stroke Lesion Outcome Prediction Based on MRI Imaging Combined With Clinical Information.基于MRI成像结合临床信息的中风病变结果预测
用于缺血性中风分割的噪声诱导自监督混合UNet变压器,数据标注有限。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jun 5;15(1):19783. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-04819-2.
4
A Novel Self-Supervised Learning-Based Method for Dynamic CT Brain Perfusion Imaging.一种基于新型自监督学习的动态CT脑灌注成像方法。
J Imaging Inform Med. 2025 Aug;38(4):2102-2119. doi: 10.1007/s10278-024-01341-1. Epub 2024 Dec 4.
5
APIS: a paired CT-MRI dataset for ischemic stroke segmentation - methods and challenges.APIS:用于缺血性脑卒中分割的配对 CT-MRI 数据集——方法与挑战。
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 4;14(1):20543. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-71273-x.
6
A comprehensive review for artificial intelligence on neuroimaging in rehabilitation of ischemic stroke.关于人工智能在缺血性中风康复中神经影像学应用的综合综述。
Front Neurol. 2024 Mar 28;15:1367854. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1367854. eCollection 2024.
7
Hybrid UNet transformer architecture for ischemic stoke segmentation with MRI and CT datasets.用于利用MRI和CT数据集进行缺血性中风分割的混合UNet变压器架构。
Front Neurosci. 2023 Nov 30;17:1298514. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1298514. eCollection 2023.
8
CT perfusion stroke lesion threshold calibration between deconvolution algorithms.基于去卷积算法的 CT 灌注脑卒中病灶阈值校准。
Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 5;13(1):21458. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-48700-6.
9
Severely Hypoperfused Brain Tissue Correlates with Final Infarct Volume Despite Recanalization in DMVO Stroke.在糖尿病性大脑中动脉闭塞性卒中中,尽管实现了再通,但严重灌注不足的脑组织与最终梗死体积相关。
J Belg Soc Radiol. 2023 Nov 22;107(1):90. doi: 10.5334/jbsr.3269. eCollection 2023.
10
Non-inferiority of deep learning ischemic stroke segmentation on non-contrast CT within 16-hours compared to expert neuroradiologists.深度学习算法在 16 小时内对非对比度 CT 影像进行缺血性脑卒中分割的效果不劣于专家神经放射科医师。
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 26;13(1):16153. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-42961-x.
Front Neurol. 2018 Dec 5;9:1060. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.01060. eCollection 2018.
4
Machine Learning in Acute Ischemic Stroke Neuroimaging.急性缺血性脑卒中神经影像学中的机器学习
Front Neurol. 2018 Nov 8;9:945. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00945. eCollection 2018.
5
ISLES 2016 and 2017-Benchmarking Ischemic Stroke Lesion Outcome Prediction Based on Multispectral MRI.ISLES 2016和2017——基于多光谱磁共振成像的缺血性中风病灶结果预测基准研究
Front Neurol. 2018 Sep 13;9:679. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00679. eCollection 2018.
6
Deep Learning in Neuroradiology.深度学习在神经影像学中的应用。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018 Oct;39(10):1776-1784. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5543. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
7
2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.2018 急性缺血性脑卒中患者早期管理指南:美国心脏协会/美国卒中协会医疗保健专业人员指南。
Stroke. 2018 Mar;49(3):e46-e110. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000158. Epub 2018 Jan 24.
8
Thrombectomy for Stroke at 6 to 16 Hours with Selection by Perfusion Imaging.6至16小时卒中的血栓切除术及灌注成像选择
N Engl J Med. 2018 Feb 22;378(8):708-718. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1713973. Epub 2018 Jan 24.
9
Thrombectomy 6 to 24 Hours after Stroke with a Mismatch between Deficit and Infarct.发病后 6 至 24 小时内进行取栓术治疗与缺损和梗死不匹配的脑卒中。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jan 4;378(1):11-21. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1706442. Epub 2017 Nov 11.
10
Deep into the Brain: Artificial Intelligence in Stroke Imaging.深入大脑:中风成像中的人工智能
J Stroke. 2017 Sep;19(3):277-285. doi: 10.5853/jos.2017.02054. Epub 2017 Sep 29.