• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于共同决策的患者决策辅助工具选择:一项多案例定性研究。

Patient Decision Aid Selection for Shared Decision Making: A Multicase Qualitative Study.

作者信息

LeRouge Cynthia, Nguyen Ann M, Bowen Deborah J

机构信息

University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA.

出版信息

Med Care Res Rev. 2022 Apr;79(2):267-280. doi: 10.1177/10775587211012995. Epub 2021 May 6.

DOI:10.1177/10775587211012995
PMID:33957792
Abstract

The patient decision aid (PDA) is a promising patient engagement tool for use in shared decision making (SDM). Selecting a PDA is an essential precursor to successful SDM implementation. Little is known regarding the organizational stakeholder process for assessing and selecting a PDA. We conducted a qualitative, multicase study within the context of a maternal health decision to identify the criteria used by stakeholders to select a PDA. We further explored the perceived value of PDA certification on PDA selection. We reported the PDA selection criteria within the domains of (1) Design and Functionality, (2) User Fit, (3) Context and Climate, (4) Support, and (5) Strategic Vision and found that certification was perceived to be a valuable screening mechanism for smaller health organizations. Health organizations and researchers may use our PDA selection criteria and conceptual model to plan future deployments of PDAs and patient engagement tools.

摘要

患者决策辅助工具(PDA)是一种用于共同决策(SDM)的很有前景的患者参与工具。选择PDA是成功实施SDM的重要前提。关于评估和选择PDA的组织利益相关者过程,我们知之甚少。我们在孕产妇健康决策的背景下进行了一项定性多案例研究,以确定利益相关者选择PDA所使用的标准。我们进一步探讨了PDA认证在PDA选择方面的感知价值。我们报告了在以下领域的PDA选择标准:(1)设计与功能,(2)用户适配性,(3)背景与氛围,(4)支持,以及(5)战略愿景,并发现认证被认为是较小健康组织的一种有价值的筛选机制。健康组织和研究人员可以使用我们的PDA选择标准和概念模型来规划PDA和患者参与工具的未来部署。

相似文献

1
Patient Decision Aid Selection for Shared Decision Making: A Multicase Qualitative Study.用于共同决策的患者决策辅助工具选择:一项多案例定性研究。
Med Care Res Rev. 2022 Apr;79(2):267-280. doi: 10.1177/10775587211012995. Epub 2021 May 6.
2
Development and validation of a patient decision aid for prostate Cancer therapy: from paternalistic towards participative shared decision making.开发和验证前列腺癌治疗患者决策辅助工具:从家长式决策向参与式共享决策转变。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Jul 11;19(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0862-4.
3
Modified Delphi survey for the evidence summarisation of patient decision aids: Study protocol.德尔菲法调查用于患者决策辅助工具证据总结:研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 23;9(3):e026701. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026701.
4
Factors influencing implementation of a patient decision aid in a developing country: an exploratory study.影响发展中国家患者决策辅助工具实施的因素:一项探索性研究。
Implement Sci. 2017 Mar 21;12(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0569-9.
5
Building ground for didactics in a patient decision aid for hip osteoarthritis. Exploring patient-related barriers and facilitators towards shared decision-making.为髋关节骨关节炎患者决策辅助工具构建教学基础。探索与患者相关的障碍和促进因素,以实现共同决策。
Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Jul;103(7):1343-1350. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.02.003. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
6
Beyond pros and cons - developing a patient decision aid to cultivate dialog to build relationships: insights from a qualitative study and decision aid development.超越利弊 - 开发患者决策辅助工具以培养对话建立关系:来自定性研究和决策辅助工具开发的见解。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Sep 18;19(1):186. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0898-5.
7
Development of a patient decision aid for treatment resistant depression.治疗抵抗性抑郁症患者决策辅助工具的开发。
J Affect Disord. 2020 Oct 1;275:299-306. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.07.014. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
8
Closing the value-based circle in shared decision-making: a digital framework for informing the shared decision-making process through patient reported outcome and experience measures.在共享决策中实现价值循环:通过患者报告的结果和体验测量为共享决策过程提供信息的数字框架。
Front Public Health. 2024 Aug 29;12:1452440. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1452440. eCollection 2024.
9
Toward Minimum Standards for Certifying Patient Decision Aids: A Modified Delphi Consensus Process.迈向患者决策辅助工具认证的最低标准:一种改进的德尔菲共识过程。
Med Decis Making. 2014 Aug;34(6):699-710. doi: 10.1177/0272989X13501721. Epub 2013 Aug 20.
10
Quality of reporting of patient decision aids in recent randomized controlled trials: A descriptive synthesis and comparative analysis.近期随机对照试验中患者决策辅助工具报告质量的描述性综合和对比分析。
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Jul;100(7):1387-1393. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.02.021. Epub 2017 Feb 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of two different patient decision aids in prosthodontic consultations: a prospective randomized controlled study.两种不同患者决策辅助工具在修复咨询中的影响:一项前瞻性随机对照研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Dec;27(12):7841-7849. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05375-7. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
2
Qualitative study of willingness and demand for participation in decision-making regarding anticoagulation therapy in patient undergoing heart valve replacement.心脏瓣膜置换术后抗凝治疗决策参与意愿和需求的定性研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Feb 18;22(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01780-2.
3
Factors Affecting the Initiation of a Shared Decision Making Program in Obstetric Practices.
影响产科实践中共同决策项目启动的因素。
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Sep 16;9(9):1217. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9091217.