• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

1996年至2018年美国成年人邮购处方药使用趋势:一项全国代表性重复横断面研究

Trends in Mail-Order Prescription Use among U.S. Adults from 1996 to 2018: A Nationally Representative Repeated Cross-Sectional Study.

作者信息

Do Duy, Geldsetzer Pascal

机构信息

Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, University of Heidelberg, Germany, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford University, 1701 Page Mill Rd, Palo Alto, CA 94304, United States.

Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford University, Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, University of Heidelberg, Germany, 291 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, United States.

出版信息

medRxiv. 2020 Sep 23:2020.09.22.20199505. doi: 10.1101/2020.09.22.20199505.

DOI:10.1101/2020.09.22.20199505
PMID:32995817
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7523158/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mail-order prescriptions are popular in the U.S., but the recent mail delays due to operational changes at the United States Postal Services (USPS) may postpone the delivery of vital medications. Despite growing recognition of the health and economic effects of a postal crisis on mail-order pharmacy consumers, little is known about the extent of mail-order prescription use, and most importantly, the population groups and types of medications that will likely be most affected by these postal delays.

METHODS

The prevalence of mail-order prescription use was assessed using a nationally representative repeated cross-sectional survey (the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey) carried out among adults aged 18 and older in each year from 1996 to 2018. We stratified use of mail-order prescription by socio-demographic and health characteristics. Additionally, we calculated which prescription medications were most prevalent among all mailed medications, and for which medications users were most likely to opt for mail-order prescription.

FINDINGS

500,217 adults participated in the survey. Between 1996 and 2018, the prevalence of using at least one mail-order prescription in a year among U.S. adults was 9.8% (95% CI, 9.5%-10.0%). Each user purchased a mean of 19.4 (95% CI, 19.0-19.8) mail-order prescriptions annually. The prevalence of use increased from 6.9% (95% CI, 6.4%-7.5%) in 1996 to 10.3% (95% CI, 9.7%-10.9%) in 2018, and the mean annual number of mail-order prescriptions per user increased from 10.7 (95% CI, 9.8-11.7) to 20.5 (95% CI, 19.3-21.7) over the same period. Use of mail-order prescription in 2018 was common among adults aged 65 and older (23.9% [95% CI, 22.3%-25.4%]), non-Hispanic whites (13.6% [95% CI, 12.8%-14.5%]), married adults (12.7% [95% CI, 11.8%-13.6%]), college graduates (12.2% [95% CI, 11.3%-13.1%]), high-income adults (12.6%, [95% CI, 11.6%-13.6%]), disabled adults (19.3% [95% CI, 17.9%-20.7%]), adults with poor health status (15.6% [95% CI, 11.6%-19.6%]), adults with three or more chronic conditions (24.2% [95% CI, 22.2%-26.2%]), Medicare beneficiaries (22.8% [95% CI, 21.4%-24.3%]), and military-insured adults (13.9% [95% CI, 10.8%-17.1%]). Mail-order prescriptions were commonly filled for analgesics, levothyroxine, cardiovascular agents, antibiotics, and diabetes medications.

INTERPRETATION

The use of mail-order prescription, including for critical medications such as insulin, is increasingly common among U.S. adults and displays substantial variation between population groups. A national slowdown of mail delivery could have important health consequences for a considerable proportion of the U.S. population, particularly during the current Coronavirus disease 2019 epidemic.

摘要

背景

邮购处方在美国很普遍,但由于美国邮政服务(USPS)运营变化导致近期邮件延误,可能会推迟重要药物的交付。尽管人们越来越认识到邮政危机对邮购药房消费者的健康和经济影响,但对于邮购处方的使用程度,以及最重要的是,哪些人群和药物类型可能受到这些邮政延误的影响最大,了解甚少。

方法

使用1996年至2018年每年对18岁及以上成年人进行的具有全国代表性的重复横断面调查(医疗支出小组调查)来评估邮购处方的使用情况。我们根据社会人口统计学和健康特征对邮购处方的使用进行分层。此外,我们计算了所有邮寄药物中哪些处方药最普遍,以及用户最有可能选择邮购处方的药物。

结果

500,217名成年人参与了调查。1996年至2018年期间,美国成年人中每年至少使用一张邮购处方的比例为9.8%(95%置信区间,9.5%-10.0%)。每位用户每年平均购买19.4(95%置信区间,19.0-19.8)张邮购处方。使用率从1996年的6.9%(95%置信区间,6.4%-7.5%)上升到2018年的10.3%(95%置信区间,9.7%-10.9%),同期每位用户每年的邮购处方平均数量从10.7(95%置信区间,9.8-11.7)增加到20.5(95%置信区间,19.3-21.7)。2018年,65岁及以上成年人(23.9%[95%置信区间,22.3%-25.4%])、非西班牙裔白人(13.6%[95%置信区间,12.8%-14.5%])、已婚成年人(12.7%[95%置信区间,11.8%-13.6%])、大学毕业生(12.2%[95%置信区间,11.3%-13.1%])、高收入成年人(12.6%,[95%置信区间,11.6%-13.6%])、残疾成年人(19.3%[95%置信区间,17.9%-20.7%])、健康状况不佳的成年人(15.6%[95%置信区间,11.6%-19.6%])、患有三种或更多慢性病的成年人(24.2%[95%置信区间,22.2%-26.2%])、医疗保险受益人(22.8%[95%置信区间,21.4%-24.3%])和有军事保险的成年人(13.9%[95%置信区间,10.8%-17.1%])中,邮购处方的使用很普遍。邮购处方通常用于镇痛药、左甲状腺素、心血管药物、抗生素和糖尿病药物。

解读

在美国成年人中,包括胰岛素等关键药物的邮购处方使用越来越普遍,并且在不同人群之间存在很大差异。全国范围内的邮件投递放缓可能会对相当一部分美国人口产生重要的健康影响,尤其是在当前的2019冠状病毒病疫情期间。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5be/7523158/cd76e0efff9a/nihpp-2020.09.22.20199505-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5be/7523158/a8f5a441275b/nihpp-2020.09.22.20199505-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5be/7523158/dfbc66558362/nihpp-2020.09.22.20199505-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5be/7523158/38a466c2e0b5/nihpp-2020.09.22.20199505-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5be/7523158/9727a92277af/nihpp-2020.09.22.20199505-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5be/7523158/c819336ad64d/nihpp-2020.09.22.20199505-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5be/7523158/cd76e0efff9a/nihpp-2020.09.22.20199505-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5be/7523158/a8f5a441275b/nihpp-2020.09.22.20199505-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5be/7523158/dfbc66558362/nihpp-2020.09.22.20199505-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5be/7523158/38a466c2e0b5/nihpp-2020.09.22.20199505-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5be/7523158/9727a92277af/nihpp-2020.09.22.20199505-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5be/7523158/c819336ad64d/nihpp-2020.09.22.20199505-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5be/7523158/cd76e0efff9a/nihpp-2020.09.22.20199505-f0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Trends in Mail-Order Prescription Use among U.S. Adults from 1996 to 2018: A Nationally Representative Repeated Cross-Sectional Study.1996年至2018年美国成年人邮购处方药使用趋势:一项全国代表性重复横断面研究
medRxiv. 2020 Sep 23:2020.09.22.20199505. doi: 10.1101/2020.09.22.20199505.
2
Trends in Mail-Order Pharmacy Use in the U.S. From 1996 to 2018: An Analysis of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey.1996 年至 2018 年美国邮购药店使用趋势:医疗支出面板调查分析。
Am J Prev Med. 2021 Aug;61(2):e63-e72. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.02.017. Epub 2021 May 3.
3
Factors associated with choice of pharmacy setting among DoD health care beneficiaries aged 65 years or older.65岁及以上国防部医疗保健受益人群中与药房选择相关的因素。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2007 Oct;13(8):677-86. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2007.13.8.677.
4
Patterns of use and expenses associated with mail-service pharmacy in adults with diabetes.糖尿病成人患者中与邮购药房相关的使用模式和费用情况。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2015 Jan-Feb;55(1):41-51. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2015.14058.
5
Characteristics of Mail-Order Pharmacy Users: Results From the Medical Expenditures Panel Survey.邮购药房使用者的特征:医疗支出小组调查结果
J Pharm Pract. 2020 Jun;33(3):293-298. doi: 10.1177/0897190018800188. Epub 2018 Oct 2.
6
Characteristics of U.S. adults taking prescription antipsychotic medications, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2013-2018.美国成年人服用处方抗精神病药物的特征,2013-2018 年全国健康和营养调查。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Oct 1;20(1):483. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02895-4.
7
National Trends in Cessation Counseling, Prescription Medication Use, and Associated Costs Among US Adult Cigarette Smokers.美国成年烟民戒烟咨询、处方药物使用及相关费用的全国趋势。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 May 3;2(5):e194585. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.4585.
8
Patterns of Long-Term Prescription Opioid Use Among Older Adults in the United States: A Study of Medicare Administrative Claims Data.美国老年人中长期处方阿片类药物使用模式:对医疗保险行政索赔数据的研究。
Pain Physician. 2021 Jan;24(1):31-40.
9
Mail-order pharmacy use and medication adherence among Medicare Part D beneficiaries with diabetes.邮购药房使用与糖尿病 Medicare Part D 受益人的药物依从性。
J Med Econ. 2011;14(5):562-7. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2011.598200. Epub 2011 Jul 6.
10
The impact of 90-day prescriptions on adherence at workplace pharmacies compared to traditional mail order.90 天处方对工作场所药房与传统邮购相比对依从性的影响。
Popul Health Manag. 2011 Dec;14(6):285-91. doi: 10.1089/pop.2010.0076. Epub 2011 Nov 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Rethinking access to care: A spatial-economic analysis of the potential impact of pharmacy closures in the United States.重新思考医疗服务可及性:美国关闭药店的潜在影响的空间经济分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 27;18(7):e0289284. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289284. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Medication shortages during the COVID-19 pandemic: Saving more than COVID lives.新冠疫情期间的药品短缺:拯救的不止是新冠患者的生命。
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Jul;45:557-559. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.07.044. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
2
Factors associated with COVID-19-related death using OpenSAFELY.使用 OpenSAFELY 分析与 COVID-19 相关死亡的因素。
Nature. 2020 Aug;584(7821):430-436. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2521-4. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
3
Characteristics of Mail-Order Pharmacy Users: Results From the Medical Expenditures Panel Survey.
邮购药房使用者的特征:医疗支出小组调查结果
J Pharm Pract. 2020 Jun;33(3):293-298. doi: 10.1177/0897190018800188. Epub 2018 Oct 2.
4
Consumers' characteristics associated with the use of mail pharmacy services in the United States: Findings from the 2015 National Consumer Survey on the Medication Experience.美国与使用邮购药房服务相关的消费者特征:2015年全国药物治疗体验消费者调查结果
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2017 Mar-Apr;57(2):206-210. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2016.09.007. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
5
The Relationship between Health Literacy and Health Disparities: A Systematic Review.健康素养与健康差距之间的关系:一项系统综述。
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 23;10(12):e0145455. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145455. eCollection 2015.
6
Patterns of use and expenses associated with mail-service pharmacy in adults with diabetes.糖尿病成人患者中与邮购药房相关的使用模式和费用情况。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2015 Jan-Feb;55(1):41-51. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2015.14058.
7
Attitudes of Medicare-eligible Americans toward mail service pharmacy.符合医疗保险资格的美国人对邮购药房的态度。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2013 Sep;19(7):564-72. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2013.19.7.564.
8
Defining and measuring chronic conditions: imperatives for research, policy, program, and practice.定义和衡量慢性病:研究、政策、项目和实践的必要条件。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2013 Apr 25;10:E66. doi: 10.5888/pcd10.120239.
9
Implications of the accuracy of MEPS prescription drug data for health services research.医疗支出面板调查(MEPS)处方药数据的准确性对卫生服务研究的影响。
Inquiry. 2011 Fall;48(3):242-59. doi: 10.5034/inquiryjrnl_48.03.04.
10
The comparative effectiveness of mail order pharmacy use vs. local pharmacy use on LDL-C control in new statin users.新使用他汀类药物患者中,邮购药店用药与当地药店用药对 LDL-C 控制的比较效果。
J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Dec;26(12):1396-402. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1805-7. Epub 2011 Jul 20.