Boat B W, Everson M D
Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill 27514.
Child Abuse Negl. 1988;12(2):171-9. doi: 10.1016/0145-2134(88)90025-7.
A total of 295 child protection workers, law enforcement officers, mental health practitioners, and physicians were surveyed to ascertain their uses of the anatomical dolls in child sexual abuse evaluations and their interpretations of young children's interactions with the dolls. The dolls enjoy fairly wide use among all four professional groups although most professionals employing the dolls have had little specific training in their use. Law enforcement officers were significantly less likely than the other professionals to view children's demonstrations of sexual acts with the dolls as convincing evidence of sexual abuse. There was no behavior (e.g., undressing the dolls, touching the dolls' genitals) which all professional groups unanimously agreed would be normal play behavior by young children ages 2-5, who had not been sexually abused. Results highlight the need for training resources and normative research.
总共对295名儿童保护工作者、执法人员、心理健康从业者和医生进行了调查，以确定他们在儿童性虐待评估中对解剖玩偶的使用情况，以及他们对幼儿与玩偶互动的解读。尽管大多数使用这些玩偶的专业人员在使用方面几乎没有接受过专门培训，但这些玩偶在所有四个专业群体中都有相当广泛的应用。与其他专业人员相比，执法人员将儿童与玩偶进行性行为示范视为性虐待的确凿证据的可能性要小得多。对于2至5岁未遭受性虐待的幼儿来说，没有一种行为（例如，给玩偶脱衣服、触摸玩偶的生殖器）能得到所有专业群体一致认可为正常的玩耍行为。结果凸显了培训资源和规范性研究的必要性。
