• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在社区环境中使用 NANDA、NOC 和 NIC 分类法的电子护理计划:意大利北部的一项描述性研究。

Electronic nursing care plans through the use of NANDA, NOC, and NIC taxonomies in community setting: A descriptive study in northern Italy.

机构信息

IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Italy.

Nurse Management, Division of Outpatient Care (Ausl Bologna), Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Nurs Knowl. 2022 Jan;33(1):72-80. doi: 10.1111/2047-3095.12326. Epub 2021 May 7.

DOI:10.1111/2047-3095.12326
PMID:33960713
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9290471/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To carry on a descriptive analysis of nursing standardized language through the use of a software within outpatient facilities in northern Italy, organized according to the Chronic Care Model (CCM) and called Community Health Centers (CHC).

METHODS

A descriptive design was adopted for the study. NANDA-I, NOC, and NIC taxonomies have been used to analyze care plans pulled from the software. Both qualitative and quantitative data were analyzed.

FINDINGS

The average of nursing diagnosis correctly identified with respect to the nursing assessment is 83.7% (SD 29.9%). Class 4 diagnoses from Domains 4 have been identified as the most prevalent (22.4%), followed by risk for unstable blood glucose level 00179 (16.4%) and risk for overweight 00234 (13%). The main nursing outcomes were vital signs 0802 (22.5%), blood glucose level 2300 (16%), and weight loss behavior 1627 (11%). The most prevalent nursing interventions are wound care 3660 (27%), medication administration: intramuscular 2313 (19%), and health education 5510 (14%). The analysis shows ability in identifying nursing diagnoses, but a larger variability with outcomes and interventions. The study highlights the nursing role within CHC and identifies the main areas of expertise in chronic disease management: prevention and health education.

CONCLUSIONS

Nurses' role is fundamental for chronic disease management within CHC; NANDA-I taxonomy helps to analyze care plans.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

  • A taxonomy such as NANDA-I represents a valid opportunity to make more visible how much nursing skills affect the achievement of a higher level of health in chronic patients. - This study is useful in the further training of outpatient nurses who works in CHC. - The study represents the starting point for future research to deepen the development of a standardized nursing language in outpatient facilities.
摘要

目的

通过在意大利北部的门诊机构中使用一种根据慢性病护理模式(CCM)命名为社区卫生中心(CHC)的软件,对护理标准化语言进行描述性分析。

方法

本研究采用描述性设计。使用 NANDA-I、NOC 和 NIC 分类法来分析从软件中提取的护理计划。同时分析了定性和定量数据。

结果

在护理评估方面,护理诊断的平均正确识别率为 83.7%(SD 29.9%)。领域 4 的第 4 类诊断被认为是最常见的(22.4%),其次是不稳定血糖水平的风险 00179(16.4%)和超重的风险 00234(13%)。主要护理结局是生命体征 0802(22.5%)、血糖水平 2300(16%)和减肥行为 1627(11%)。最常见的护理干预措施是伤口护理 3660(27%)、肌肉内给药 2313(19%)和健康教育 5510(14%)。分析表明,护理诊断的识别能力较强,但护理结局和干预措施的差异较大。本研究突出了 CHC 中护士的作用,并确定了慢性病管理的主要专业领域:预防和健康教育。

结论

护士在 CHC 中的慢性病管理中起着至关重要的作用;NANDA-I 分类法有助于分析护理计划。

对护理实践的启示

  • NANDA-I 等分类法为如何使护理技能对慢性病患者获得更高水平的健康产生影响更加显而易见提供了一个有效的机会。- 本研究对在 CHC 工作的门诊护士的进一步培训具有重要意义。- 本研究为未来的研究奠定了基础,以深化门诊机构中标准化护理语言的发展。

相似文献

1
Electronic nursing care plans through the use of NANDA, NOC, and NIC taxonomies in community setting: A descriptive study in northern Italy.在社区环境中使用 NANDA、NOC 和 NIC 分类法的电子护理计划:意大利北部的一项描述性研究。
Int J Nurs Knowl. 2022 Jan;33(1):72-80. doi: 10.1111/2047-3095.12326. Epub 2021 May 7.
2
NANDA-I, NOC, and NIC linkages to SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19): Part 2. Individual response.NANDA-I、NOC 和 NIC 与 SARS-CoV-2(COVID-19)的关联:第 2 部分。个体反应。
Int J Nurs Knowl. 2021 Jan;32(1):68-83. doi: 10.1111/2047-3095.12307. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
3
NANDA-I, NOC, and NIC Linkages to SARS-Cov-2 (Covid-19): Part 1. Community Response.NANDA-I、NOC 和 NIC 与 SARS-CoV-2(新冠病毒)的关联:第 1 部分。社区应对。
Int J Nurs Knowl. 2021 Jan;32(1):59-67. doi: 10.1111/2047-3095.12291. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
4
Identification of North American Nursing Diagnosis Association-Nursing Interventions Classification-Nursing Outcomes Classification of nursing home residents using on-time data by android smartphone application by registered nurses.利用注册护士的安卓智能手机应用程序,通过按时数据识别养老院居民的北美护理诊断协会-护理干预分类-护理结局分类。
Int J Nurs Knowl. 2024 Jan;35(1):46-68. doi: 10.1111/2047-3095.12419. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
5
Identifying Frequently Used NANDA-I Nursing Diagnoses, NOC Outcomes, NIC Interventions, and NNN Linkages for Nursing Home Residents in Korea.识别韩国养老院居民常用的 NANDA-I 护理诊断、NOC 结果、NIC 干预措施和 NNN 联系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 1;18(21):11505. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111505.
6
Application of NANDA-I nursing diagnoses, nursing interventions classification, and nursing outcomes classification in research and practice of cardiac rehabilitation nursing: A scoping review.NANDA-I 护理诊断、护理干预分类和护理结局分类在心脏康复护理研究和实践中的应用:范围综述。
Int J Nurs Knowl. 2024 Jul;35(3):256-271. doi: 10.1111/2047-3095.12441. Epub 2023 Aug 21.
7
NANDA-I, NOC, and NIC linkages to SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19): Part 3. Family response.NANDA-I、NOC 和 NIC 与 SARS-CoV-2(COVID-19)的关联:第 3 部分。家庭反应。
Int J Nurs Knowl. 2022 Jan;33(1):5-17. doi: 10.1111/2047-3095.12323. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
8
NANDA-I, NOC, and NIC Linkages for Nutritional Problems.NANDA-I、NOC 和 NIC 与营养问题的关联。
Int J Nurs Knowl. 2020 Oct;31(4):246-252. doi: 10.1111/2047-3095.12279. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
9
Identifying core NANDA-I nursing diagnoses, NIC interventions, NOC outcomes, and NNN linkages for heart failure.确定心力衰竭的核心北美护理诊断协会(NANDA-I)护理诊断、护理干预分类(NIC)干预措施、护理结局分类(NOC)结局以及护理诊断-护理措施-护理结局(NNN)关联。
Int J Nurs Knowl. 2014 Feb;25(1):30-8. doi: 10.1111/2047-3095.12010. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
10
[Planning With Nanda, Noc, Nic Taxonomies In Neurologic Rehabilitation. A clinical study].[运用南丁格尔、护理结果分类法和护理干预分类法进行神经康复规划。一项临床研究]
Prof Inferm. 2015 Jul-Sep;68(3):163-8. doi: 10.7429/pi.2015.683163.

引用本文的文献

1
The nursing process and total health cost variability: an analysis using machine learning.护理过程与总体医疗成本变异性:一项使用机器学习的分析
BMC Nurs. 2025 Jul 1;24(1):738. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03304-5.
2
Nursing Diagnoses, Planned Outcomes and Associated Interventions with Highly Complex Chronic Patients in Primary Care Settings: An Observational Study.初级保健机构中高度复杂慢性病患者的护理诊断、预期结果及相关干预措施:一项观察性研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Dec 12;10(12):2512. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10122512.

本文引用的文献

1
[Accuracy of hospital nursing documentation: a multi-center observational study].[医院护理文件记录的准确性:一项多中心观察性研究]
Prof Inferm. 2020 Apr-Jun;73(2):81-88. doi: 10.7429/pi.2020.732081.
2
NANDA-I, NIC, and NOC taxonomies, patients' satisfaction, and nurses' perception of the work environment: an Italian cross-sectional pilot study.NANDA-I、NIC 和 NOC 分类法、患者满意度和护士对工作环境的感知:意大利横断面试点研究。
Acta Biomed. 2020 Jun 20;91(6-S):85-91. doi: 10.23750/abm.v91i6-S.8951.
3
[Relevance of NANDA-I diagnoses in patients undergoing haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a Delphi study].[北美护理诊断协会国际诊断分类在造血干细胞移植患者中的相关性:一项德尔菲研究]
Prof Inferm. 2019 Apr-Jun;72(2):120-128. doi: 10.7429/pi.2019.722128.
4
Benefits and limitations of implementing Chronic Care Model (CCM) in primary care programs: A systematic review.实施初级保健计划中的慢性病管理模式(CCM)的优缺点:系统评价。
Int J Cardiol. 2018 May 1;258:279-288. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.11.057.
5
Does the chronic care model meet the emerging needs of people living with multimorbidity? A systematic review and thematic synthesis.慢性病照护模式是否满足患有多种慢性病患者的新需求?一项系统综述与主题综合分析。
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 8;13(2):e0190852. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190852. eCollection 2018.
6
Impact of Chronic Care Model on diabetes care in Tuscany: a controlled before-after study.慢性病照护模式对托斯卡纳地区糖尿病照护的影响:一项前后对照研究。
Eur J Public Health. 2017 Feb 1;27(1):8-13. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckw189.
7
The implementation of a Community Health Centre-based primary care model in Italy. The experience of the Case della Salute in the Emilia-Romagna Region.意大利基于社区健康中心的初级保健模式的实施。艾米利亚 - 罗马涅地区“健康之家”的经验。
Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2016;52(1):70-7. doi: 10.4415/ANN_16_01_13.
8
Preliminary Evidence for the Usefulness of Standardized Nursing Terminologies in Different Fields of Application: A Literature Review.标准化护理术语在不同应用领域有用性的初步证据:一项文献综述
Int J Nurs Knowl. 2017 Apr;28(2):109-119. doi: 10.1111/2047-3095.12123. Epub 2015 Nov 25.
9
Effectiveness of chronic care models: opportunities for improving healthcare practice and health outcomes: a systematic review.慢性病照护模式的有效性:改善医疗实践与健康结局的机遇:一项系统综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 May 10;15:194. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0854-8.
10
The chronic care model and technological research and innovation: a scoping review at the crossroads.慢性病照护模式与技术研究及创新:十字路口的一项范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Feb 6;17(2):e25. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3547.