Suppr超能文献

一般人群对 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的知识、态度和实践:系统评价和荟萃分析及政策建议。

Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of the general population about Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a systematic review and meta-analysis with policy recommendations.

机构信息

Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran.

Cardiovascular Diseases Research Center, Department of Cardiology, Heshmat Hospital, School of Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.

出版信息

Public Health. 2021 May;194:185-195. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2021.03.005. Epub 2021 Mar 24.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate and synthesize the current evidence on knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAPs) of the general population regarding COVID-19.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search on PubMed/LitCovid, Scopus, and Web of Sciences databases for papers in the English language only, up to 1 January 2021. We used the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist developed for cross-sectional studies to appraise the quality of the included studies. All stages of the review conducted by two independent reviewers and potential discrepancies were solved with a consultation with a third reviewer. We reported the result as number and percentage. A meta-analysis conducted using a random effect model with a 95% confidence interval.

RESULTS

Forty-eight studies encompassing 76,848 participants were included in this review. 56.53% of the participants were female. The mean age of the participants was 33.7 years. 85.42% of the included studies were scored as good quality, 12.50% as fair quality, and the remaining (2.08%) as low quality. About 87.5% examined all three components of the KAPs model. The knowledge component was reported as good and poor in 89.5% and 10.5% of the included studies, respectively. Of the studies that examined the attitude component, 100% reported a positive attitude. For the practice component, 93.2% reported satisfactory practice, and 6.8% poor practice. The result of the meta-analysis showed that the overall score of KAPs components about COVID-19 were 78.9, 79.8, and 74.1, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review and meta-analysis showed that the overall KAP components in the included studies were at an acceptable level. In general, knowledge was at a good level, the attitude was positive and practice was at a satisfactory level. Using an integrated international system can help better evaluate these components and compare them between countries. PROSPERO REGISTRATION CODE: (CRD42020186755).

摘要

目的

本研究旨在调查和综合当前普通人群对 COVID-19 的知识、态度和实践(KAP)的证据。

研究设计

这是一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

方法

我们仅对英文文献进行了系统搜索,检索了 PubMed/LitCovid、Scopus 和 Web of Sciences 数据库,截至 2021 年 1 月 1 日。我们使用了 Joanna Briggs 研究所制定的横断面研究检查表来评估纳入研究的质量。由两名独立评审员进行审查的所有阶段,如果出现潜在差异,则与第三名评审员进行协商解决。我们以数字和百分比报告结果。使用具有 95%置信区间的随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。

结果

本综述共纳入 48 项研究,涵盖 76848 名参与者。参与者中 56.53%为女性。参与者的平均年龄为 33.7 岁。纳入的研究中 85.42%评分良好,12.50%评分中等,其余(2.08%)评分较差。大约 87.5%的研究检查了 KAPs 模型的所有三个组成部分。知识组成部分在纳入研究中的报告分别为 89.5%和 10.5%良好和较差。在检查态度组成部分的研究中,100%报告了积极的态度。对于实践组成部分,93.2%报告了满意的实践,6.8%报告了较差的实践。荟萃分析的结果表明,COVID-19 的 KAP 组成部分的总体评分分别为 78.9、79.8 和 74.1。

结论

本系统评价和荟萃分析表明,纳入研究中 KAP 各组成部分的总体水平处于可接受水平。一般来说,知识处于良好水平,态度积极,实践水平满意。使用综合国际系统可以帮助更好地评估这些组成部分,并在国家之间进行比较。PROSPERO 注册号:(CRD42020186755)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e96/7988473/53a4745f1c77/gr1_lrg.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验