Suppr超能文献

宫内节育器取出难易程度的比较研究

A comparative study of the ease of removal of intrauterine contraceptive devices.

作者信息

Roke C M

机构信息

Family Planning Association, Auckland Branch, New Zealand.

出版信息

Contraception. 1988 Jun;37(6):555-63. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(88)90002-9.

Abstract

This study compares the rates of easy and difficult removals of various types of IUDs. Eight-hundred-sixteen IUDs were removed in Auckland Family Planning Clinics in an 8-month period. Nearly 80% were the standard Multiload Copper 250. Eight-eight percent of all IUDs were easy to remove with another 7% requiring a hard pull. Of the remaining 5%, 3.5% required simple intracervical exploration, 1% required intrauterine exploration and 0.5% were referred to hospital. When compared with the standard Multiload, no IUD was statistically easier and only the Mini-Copper 7 was harder to remove at the 5% level of significance.

摘要

本研究比较了各类宫内节育器(IUD)取出的难易程度。在8个月的时间里,奥克兰计划生育诊所取出了816个宫内节育器。近80%是标准的多负载铜250型。所有宫内节育器中,88%取出容易,另有7%需要用力牵拉。其余5%中,3.5%需要简单的宫颈内探查,1%需要子宫内探查,0.5%被转诊至医院。与标准的多负载型相比,在5%的显著性水平上,没有一种宫内节育器在统计学上取出更容易,只有微型铜7型取出更困难。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验