Clinica Odontoiatrica Salzano Tirone, Cuneo, Italy.
Laboratorio Odontoprotesico Rolando Cerato, Cuneo, Italy.
J Prosthodont. 2022 Feb;31(2):121-129. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13388. Epub 2021 May 26.
To evaluate the relationship between different dimensional parameters in implant-supported monolithic zirconia fixed complete dental prostheses (IFCDPs) and the incidence of framework fracture in a large sample of cases in vivo.
This retrospective observational study evaluated all patients rehabilitated with screw-retained zirconia IFCDPs between January 2013 and April 2019 at a private practice. The minimum follow-up period was 1 year after occlusal loading. Fractures were classified as: type I-fractures that happened between but not involving the two most posterior screw-access openings (SAOs) and type II-fractures of the distal cantilever. Cantilever length, distal connector cross-sectional area, and screw access opening length were measured using data obtained from digital scans. Logistic regression was performed to evaluate the relationship between types I and II fractures and the independent variables (dimensional parameters). Using the receiver operating characteristic curves, two parameters were identified to be useful for establishing a cut-off and predicting type II fractures.
A total of 180 prostheses delivered to 140 patients were analyzed. Five implants failed in three patients: three before delivery of the definitive prostheses and two after. Ten prostheses failed (5.6% prosthetic failure rate): 2 because of implant failures, and 8 because of framework fractures. Five fractures were classified as type I and three as type II. Significant associations were found between cantilever length and type I fractures (Wald = 5.772, df = 1, p = 0.016), distal connector cross-sectional area and type II fractures (Wald = 3.806, df = 1, p = 0.051), and cantilever length and the total number of fractures (Wald = 6.117, df = 1, p = 0.013).
Zirconia IFCDPs may be reliable medium-term solutions if some dimensional parameters are followed. The ratios between the cantilever length and cross-sectional connector area should be <0.51, while the ratio between the cantilever length and screw access opening length should be <1.48.
评估种植体支持的整体氧化锆固定义齿(IFCDP)中不同维度参数与框架骨折发生率之间的关系,该研究纳入了大量体内病例。
本回顾性观察研究评估了 2013 年 1 月至 2019 年 4 月在一家私人诊所接受螺丝固位氧化锆 IFCDP 修复的所有患者。最低随访时间为修复后 1 年。骨折分为:I 型-发生在两个最靠后螺丝通道开口(SAO)之间但不涉及该开口的骨折,和 II 型-远端悬臂梁的骨折。使用数字扫描获得的数据测量悬臂长度、远端连接体的横截面积和螺丝通道开口的长度。采用逻辑回归评估 I 型和 II 型骨折与独立变量(维度参数)之间的关系。使用受试者工作特征曲线,确定两个参数用于建立截断值并预测 II 型骨折。
共分析了 140 名患者的 180 个修复体。3 名患者的 5 个种植体失败:3 个在最终修复体交付前,2 个在交付后。10 个修复体失败(5.6%的修复体失败率):2 个是因为种植体失败,8 个是因为框架骨折。5 个骨折为 I 型,3 个为 II 型。悬臂长度与 I 型骨折(Wald = 5.772,df = 1,p = 0.016)、远端连接体横截面积与 II 型骨折(Wald = 3.806,df = 1,p = 0.051)、悬臂长度与总骨折数(Wald = 6.117,df = 1,p = 0.013)之间存在显著相关性。
如果遵循一些维度参数,氧化锆 IFCDP 可能是一种可靠的中期解决方案。悬臂长度与横截面积连接体的比值应<0.51,而悬臂长度与螺丝通道开口长度的比值应<1.48。