• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

鼻窦激光闭合术(SiLaC)与 Limberg 皮瓣在肛门疾病治疗中的比较:一项短期非随机前瞻性研究。

Sinus laser closure (SiLaC) versus Limberg flap in management of pilonidal disease: A short-term non-randomized comparative prospective study.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Zagazig University Faculty of Medicine, Egypt.

出版信息

Asian J Surg. 2022 Jan;45(1):179-183. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2021.04.026. Epub 2021 May 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.asjsur.2021.04.026
PMID:33966964
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Fistula Laser Closure (FiLAC) is a method that was originally applied in the treatment of perianal fistulas. Because of promising results, diode lasers were later on used to treat pilonidal sinus disease in a method called sinus Laser Closure (SiLaC). The aim of this study is to compare between SiLaC and Limberg flap in management of pilonidal disease.

METHODS

A prospective, nonrandomized comparative study. A short-term follow-up of 71 patients with pilonidal disease was analyzed (24 operated on using the SiLaC technique and 47 using the Limberg technique). With a primary outcome is healing rate and recurrence and a secondary outcome is other measures i.e. complications, hospital stay and postoperative pain.

RESULTS

The median operative time in the SiLaC group was 26.45 ± 5.41 min (20-35 min) and in the Limberg group 58.63 ± 7.42 min (50-75 min). In the SiLaC group, the primary healing was achieved in 23 out of 24 patients (95.8%) with a total complication rate of 20.83%. There were two cases of recurrence after initial healing in each group.

CONCLUSION

Sinus laser Closure (SiLaC) is comparable to Limberg flap technique in the terms of healing rate and recurrence with better outcome regarding operative time, hospital stay and post-operative pain.

摘要

简介

瘘管激光闭合术(FiLAC)最初应用于治疗肛周瘘管。由于结果令人满意,后来二极管激光被用于治疗藏毛窦疾病,这种方法被称为窦激光闭合术(SiLaC)。本研究旨在比较 SiLaC 与 Limberg 皮瓣在藏毛窦疾病治疗中的疗效。

方法

这是一项前瞻性、非随机的对照研究。对 71 例藏毛窦疾病患者进行了短期随访(24 例采用 SiLaC 技术,47 例采用 Limberg 技术)。主要结局是愈合率和复发率,次要结局是其他指标,如并发症、住院时间和术后疼痛。

结果

SiLaC 组的中位手术时间为 26.45 ± 5.41 分钟(20-35 分钟),Limberg 组为 58.63 ± 7.42 分钟(50-75 分钟)。在 SiLaC 组,24 例患者中有 23 例(95.8%)达到了原发性愈合,总并发症发生率为 20.83%。两组中各有 2 例在初始愈合后复发。

结论

在愈合率和复发率方面,窦激光闭合术(SiLaC)与 Limberg 皮瓣技术相当,但在手术时间、住院时间和术后疼痛方面的结果更好。

相似文献

1
Sinus laser closure (SiLaC) versus Limberg flap in management of pilonidal disease: A short-term non-randomized comparative prospective study.鼻窦激光闭合术(SiLaC)与 Limberg 皮瓣在肛门疾病治疗中的比较:一项短期非随机前瞻性研究。
Asian J Surg. 2022 Jan;45(1):179-183. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2021.04.026. Epub 2021 May 6.
2
Long-term results of endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment vs Limberg flap for treatment of difficult cases of complicated pilonidal disease: a prospective, nonrandomized study.内镜下治疗与 Limberg 皮瓣治疗复杂难处理藏毛窦病的长期疗效比较:一项前瞻性、非随机研究。
Colorectal Dis. 2020 Mar;22(3):319-324. doi: 10.1111/codi.14857. Epub 2019 Oct 6.
3
Comparison of short-term results between the modified Karydakis flap and the modified Limberg flap in the management of pilonidal sinus disease: a randomized controlled study.改良 Karydakis 皮瓣与改良 Limberg 皮瓣治疗藏毛窦病的短期疗效比较:一项随机对照研究。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 Apr;56(4):491-8. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31828006f7.
4
Primary wound closure with a Limberg flap vs. secondary wound healing after excision of a pilonidal sinus: a multicentre randomised controlled study.藏毛窦切除术后Limberg皮瓣一期伤口闭合与二期伤口愈合的多中心随机对照研究。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015 Jan;30(1):97-103. doi: 10.1007/s00384-014-2057-x. Epub 2014 Nov 5.
5
The SiLaC procedure for pilonidal sinus disease: long-term outcomes of a single institution prospective study.SilaC 手术治疗藏毛窦疾病:单中心前瞻性研究的长期结果。
Tech Coloproctol. 2019 Dec;23(12):1133-1140. doi: 10.1007/s10151-019-02119-2. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
6
[Comparison of Treatments for an Infected Pilonidal Sinus: Differences in Scar Quality and Outcome Between Secondary Wound Healing and Limberg Flap in a Prospective Study].[感染性藏毛窦治疗方法的比较:前瞻性研究中二期伤口愈合与林贝格皮瓣在瘢痕质量和结局方面的差异]
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2016 Apr;48(2):111-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-111322. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
7
Randomized comparison of Limberg flap versus modified primary closure for the treatment of pilonidal disease.Limberg皮瓣与改良一期缝合治疗藏毛窦疾病的随机对照研究
Am J Surg. 2010 Jul;200(1):9-14. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.05.036.
8
Outcomes of Laser-Assisted Closure (SiLaC) Surgery for Chronic Pilonidal Sinus Disease.激光辅助闭合(SiLaC)手术治疗慢性藏毛窦疾病的疗效。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2023 Jun;33(6):556-560. doi: 10.1089/lap.2022.0567. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
9
Comparison of modified limberg flap and modified elliptical rotation flap for pilonidal sinus surgery: a retrospective cohort study.改良 Limberg 皮瓣与改良椭圆旋转皮瓣治疗藏毛窦的比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2015 Apr;16(Pt A):74-77. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.02.024. Epub 2015 Mar 7.
10
[Results of the Limberg flap procedure in acute and chronic pilonidal abscesses].[Limberg皮瓣手术治疗急慢性藏毛窦脓肿的结果]
Chirurg. 2022 Feb;93(2):182-189. doi: 10.1007/s00104-021-01439-0. Epub 2021 Jun 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of laser ablation for recurrent pilonidal sinus disease: treatment success, recurrence rates, and patient outcomes.复发性藏毛窦疾病激光消融术的评估:治疗成功率、复发率及患者预后
Lasers Med Sci. 2025 Jun 16;40(1):281. doi: 10.1007/s10103-025-04525-5.
2
Comparative Outcomes of Surgical Techniques for Pilonidal Sinus: A Turkish Retrospective Study.藏毛窦手术技术的比较结果:一项土耳其回顾性研究
Med Sci Monit. 2025 Feb 25;31:e947466. doi: 10.12659/MSM.947466.
3
Laser versus rhomboid flap for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus: multi-centre comparative study.
激光与菱形皮瓣治疗骶尾部藏毛窦的多中心比较研究。
Lasers Med Sci. 2025 Feb 15;40(1):93. doi: 10.1007/s10103-025-04341-x.
4
Sinus laser therapy versus Karydakis flap procedure in the management of pilonidal sinus disease: a comparative analysis of intraoperative parameters and postoperative outcome.鼻窦激光治疗与卡里达基斯皮瓣手术治疗藏毛窦疾病的比较:术中参数及术后结果的对比分析
Tech Coloproctol. 2024 Dec 19;29(1):26. doi: 10.1007/s10151-024-03058-3.
5
Long-term follow-up of pilonidal sinus disease treated by radial laser surgery.经皮激光手术治疗藏毛窦疾病的长期随访。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Aug 23;409(1):260. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03455-0.
6
Efficacy of laser obliteration with limited excision of pilonidal sinus.激光消融联合有限切除治疗藏毛窦的疗效。
J Int Med Res. 2024 Mar;52(3):3000605241236057. doi: 10.1177/03000605241236057.
7
Pilonidal sinus: an overview of historical and current management modalities.藏毛窦:历史和当前治疗方式概述。
Updates Surg. 2024 Jun;76(3):803-810. doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-01799-2. Epub 2024 Mar 25.
8
Comparison of laser ablation, simple excision, and flap reconstruction in the treatment of pilonidal sinus disease.激光消融、单纯切除术和皮瓣重建治疗藏毛窦疾病的比较。
Lasers Med Sci. 2024 Jan 30;39(1):52. doi: 10.1007/s10103-024-03993-5.
9
Short- and mid-term results of diode laser treatment in pilonidal sinus disease and the role of endoscopic camera use on outcomes.皮瓣窦道疾病中二极管激光治疗的短期和中期结果以及内窥镜使用对结果的影响。
Tech Coloproctol. 2023 Oct;27(10):921-928. doi: 10.1007/s10151-023-02831-0. Epub 2023 Jun 25.
10
Laser ablation: a unique and beneficial therapeutic option for pilonidal sinus? And the potential for further innovation-a review.激光消融:一种独特且有益的治疗肛旁窦的选择?以及进一步创新的潜力——综述。
Lasers Med Sci. 2023 May 18;38(1):124. doi: 10.1007/s10103-023-03788-0.