Akyol H
Department of General Surgery, Altinbas University Faculty of Medicine Medical Park Bahcelievler Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Tech Coloproctol. 2024 Dec 19;29(1):26. doi: 10.1007/s10151-024-03058-3.
This study aimed to investigate the utility of minimally invasive sinus laser therapy (SiLaT) versus flap surgery (Karydakis flap procedure) in terms of intraoperative parameters and postoperative outcome in patients with pilonidal sinus disease (PSD).
A total of 106 patients with PSD (mean ± SD age: 26.4 ± 7.0 years, 86.8% male) treated with Karydakis flap procedure (KF group; n = 63) or sinus laser therapy (SiLaT group; n = 43) were included in this retrospective study. Data on patient demographics, operative characteristics (number of openings, length of sinus tract, and operative time), and postoperative outcome including postoperative (day 1) pain intensity-visual analog scale (VAS) scores, time to return to work after surgery (days), complication rate, and recurrence rate were recorded in each patient and compared between KF and SiLaT groups.
The SiLaT versus KF procedure was associated with significantly shorter operative time [median (min-max) 17 (12-28) versus 27 (20-44) min, p = 0.001], lower pain scores [3 (1-4) versus 5 (3-7), p = 0.001], and earlier return to work [1 (1-3) versus 10 (5-20) days, p = 0.001]. Although no significant difference was noted in complication and recurrence rates between the KF and SiLaT groups, 6.3% (wound infection only) and 3.2% of patients in the KF group but none of the patients in the SiLaT group developed complication and recurrence, respectively.
SiLaT seems to be a promising minimally invasive technique for the management of PSD, being comparable to the KF procedure in terms of complications and recurrence, along with added advantages of shorter operative time, reduced postoperative pain, and earlier return to work.
本研究旨在探讨在藏毛窦疾病(PSD)患者中,微创鼻窦激光治疗(SiLaT)与皮瓣手术(卡里达基斯皮瓣手术)在术中参数和术后结果方面的效用。
本回顾性研究纳入了106例接受卡里达基斯皮瓣手术(KF组;n = 63)或鼻窦激光治疗(SiLaT组;n = 43)的PSD患者(平均±标准差年龄:26.4±7.0岁,86.8%为男性)。记录每位患者的人口统计学数据、手术特征(开口数量、窦道长度和手术时间)以及术后结果,包括术后(第1天)疼痛强度-视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、术后恢复工作时间(天)、并发症发生率和复发率,并在KF组和SiLaT组之间进行比较。
与KF手术相比,SiLaT手术的手术时间显著更短[中位数(最小值-最大值)17(12 - 28)分钟对27(20 - 44)分钟,p = 0.001],疼痛评分更低[3(1 - 4)对5(3 - 7),p = 0.001],恢复工作更早[1(1 - 3)天对10(5 - 20)天,p = 0.001]。尽管KF组和SiLaT组之间在并发症和复发率方面未观察到显著差异,但KF组分别有6.3%(仅伤口感染)和3.2%的患者出现并发症和复发,而SiLaT组无患者出现。
SiLaT似乎是一种有前景的PSD微创治疗技术,在并发症和复发方面与KF手术相当,同时具有手术时间短、术后疼痛减轻和恢复工作更早等额外优势。