Lakshmanan Lakshimi, Somasundaram Sujatha, Jeevanandan Ganesh, Subramanian Emg
Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Saveetha Dental College, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Science, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Contemp Clin Dent. 2021 Jan-Mar;12(1):3-8. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_561_20. Epub 2021 Mar 20.
The purpose of this systematic review was to compare the incidence and intensity of postoperative pain after pulpectomy using different instrumentations in primary teeth.
An extensive literature search in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Science Direct, LILAC, SIGLE, and Google Scholar was performed to identify English language articles with human subjects that evaluated the effects of different instruments on postoperative pain after pulpectomy.
The search retrieved 187 references. After screening of the abstracts and articles, based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of three articles were included in the systematic review. Of the three included studies, two of them had a moderate risk of bias and one showed a high risk of bias.
The use of rotary instruments contributed to a lower incidence and intensity of postoperative pain than did the hand instruments in all the three studies. More high-quality randomized clinical trials are needed in this field in future studies to support the evidence.
本系统评价的目的是比较乳牙牙髓摘除术采用不同器械操作后术后疼痛的发生率和强度。
在PubMed、Cochrane图书馆、Science Direct、LILAC、SIGLE和谷歌学术上进行了广泛的文献检索,以识别评估不同器械对牙髓摘除术后疼痛影响的涉及人类受试者的英文文章。
检索到187篇参考文献。根据纳入和排除标准对摘要和文章进行筛选后,共有3篇文章纳入本系统评价。在纳入的3项研究中,2项研究存在中度偏倚风险,1项研究存在高度偏倚风险。
在所有3项研究中,与手动器械相比,使用旋转器械可降低术后疼痛的发生率和强度。未来该领域需要更多高质量的随机临床试验来支持这一证据。