Spahn Claudia, Krampe Franziska, Nusseck Manfred
Freiburg Institute for Musicians' Medicine, University of Music Freiburg, Medical Faculty of the Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg, Freiburg Center for Research and Teaching in Music, Freiburg, Germany.
Childrens Hospitals Schwabing and Harlaching Munich, Hospital Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, München, Germany.
Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 23;12:538535. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.538535. eCollection 2021.
Music performance anxiety (MPA) is a commonly present topic among musicians. Most studies on MPA investigated effects of a more general occurrence of MPA on performances. Less is known about individual variations of MPA within a performance, more specifically at the times before, during, and after the performance. This study used a questionnaire to investigate these performance times in order to find out if there occur different types in the variation of the perceived MPA across the performance. The study was performed with 532 musicians; 27% of them being professional orchestra musicians, 45% non-professional orchestra musicians, and 28% non-professional choir singers. The musicians were asked to fill in the Performance-specific Questionnaire for Musicians (PQM) immediately after a performance. The questionnaire contains three scales regarding symptoms of MPA, functional coping with MPA and performance-related self-efficacy. A cluster analysis was performed on the PQM scales to identify systematic variations. Findings indicate that there are three different types of MPA in the sample studied. Type 1 describes musicians who have few symptoms of MPA throughout the performance, show functional coping with MPA, and have a stable and well-developed self-efficacy. Type 2 describes musicians who begin their performance with rather high symptoms of MPA but can positively reduce these by the end of the performance and show high values in self-efficacy and in functional coping. Type 3 contains musicians who begin their performance with some symptoms of MPA, which increase to the end of the performance. The values of self-efficacy and functional coping in this type are rather low. Of the total sample, half of the musicians were assigned to Type 1 and approximately a quarter each to Type 2 (27%) and Type 3 (23%). In accordance with the literature, the results confirm the importance of self-efficacy and functional coping for a positive performance experience.
音乐表演焦虑(MPA)是音乐家们普遍面临的一个话题。大多数关于MPA的研究调查了更普遍存在的MPA对表演的影响。对于表演过程中MPA的个体差异,尤其是表演前、表演中和表演后的个体差异,人们了解得较少。本研究使用问卷调查来探究这些表演时段,以查明在整个表演过程中,所感知到的MPA变化是否存在不同类型。该研究对532名音乐家进行;其中27%是专业管弦乐音乐家,45%是非专业管弦乐音乐家,28%是非专业合唱团歌手。要求音乐家们在一次表演结束后立即填写《音乐家特定表演问卷》(PQM)。该问卷包含关于MPA症状、应对MPA的功能性方式以及与表演相关的自我效能感的三个量表。对PQM量表进行聚类分析以识别系统变化。研究结果表明,在所研究的样本中有三种不同类型的MPA。类型1描述的是在整个表演过程中MPA症状较少、能有效应对MPA且具有稳定且良好发展的自我效能感的音乐家。类型2描述的是在表演开始时MPA症状相当高,但在表演结束时能积极减轻这些症状,且在自我效能感和功能性应对方面表现出高值的音乐家。类型3包含在表演开始时带有一些MPA症状,且这些症状在表演结束时有所增加的音乐家。这类音乐家的自我效能感和功能性应对的值相当低。在整个样本中,一半的音乐家被归为类型1,大约四分之一分别归为类型2(27%)和类型3(23%)。与文献一致,研究结果证实了自我效能感和功能性应对对于积极的表演体验的重要性。