• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创伤后应激障碍中抑制控制的眼动追踪研究:一种情绪性反扫视范式。

Eye-tracking exploration of inhibitory control in post-traumatic stress disorder: an emotional antisaccade paradigm.

作者信息

Blekic Wivine, Wauthia Erika, Kornacka Monika, Kandana Arachchige Kendra, Lefebvre Laurent, Rossignol Mandy

机构信息

Laboratory of Cognitive Psychology and Neuropsychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Mons, Mons, Belgium.

National Fund for Human Science Research, National Fund for Scientific Research (FNRS), Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2021 Apr 26;12(1):1909281. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2021.1909281.

DOI:10.1080/20008198.2021.1909281
PMID:33968331
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8079045/
Abstract

: Cognitive-behavioural studies among individuals suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) have highlighted attentional biases towards threats as a key factor in the maintenance of the disorder. Anxiety-related studies have hypothesized that attentional biases were due to attentional control difficulties in inhibition and flexibility of threatening information. : Because it remains unclear how this theory could be applied to PTSD, this study aims to evaluate the inhibitory control and flexibility abilities of negative and threatening information in this population, using eye-tracking technology. : Fifteen adults with a history of physical assault and a current diagnosis of PTSD, and 15 healthy control participants, completed an original mixed antisaccade task. : We found enhanced overt attentional allocation towards every item of emotional information among PTSD participants, such as indexed by the latencies of the first saccade in prosaccade trials, followed by disengagement difficulties, such as indexed by increased reaction time to identify the target. : Our results could represent empirical evidence of the general enhancement of attentional vigilance in people with PTSD in comparison with healthy controls, as well as specific inhibitory deficits. The results are interpreted through a fear-generalization hypothesis.

摘要

针对创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)患者的认知行为研究强调,对威胁的注意偏向是该障碍持续存在的关键因素。与焦虑相关的研究推测,注意偏向是由于在抑制和灵活处理威胁信息方面存在注意控制困难。由于尚不清楚该理论如何应用于PTSD,本研究旨在使用眼动追踪技术评估该人群对负面和威胁信息的抑制控制及灵活性能力。15名有身体攻击史且目前诊断为PTSD的成年人以及15名健康对照参与者完成了一项原创的混合反扫视任务。我们发现,PTSD参与者对每一项情绪信息的明显注意分配增强,如在顺向扫视试验中首次扫视的潜伏期所示,随后是脱离困难,如识别目标的反应时间增加所示。我们的结果可能代表了与健康对照相比,PTSD患者注意警觉性普遍增强以及特定抑制缺陷的实证证据。结果通过恐惧泛化假设进行解释。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2aa/8079045/f82f8868f6c0/ZEPT_A_1909281_F0006_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2aa/8079045/64a9fe589122/ZEPT_A_1909281_F0001_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2aa/8079045/ba097d5bd336/ZEPT_A_1909281_F0002_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2aa/8079045/3948f6902f47/ZEPT_A_1909281_F0003_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2aa/8079045/8483feefbe3c/ZEPT_A_1909281_F0004_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2aa/8079045/1baca28d7d3d/ZEPT_A_1909281_F0005_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2aa/8079045/f82f8868f6c0/ZEPT_A_1909281_F0006_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2aa/8079045/64a9fe589122/ZEPT_A_1909281_F0001_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2aa/8079045/ba097d5bd336/ZEPT_A_1909281_F0002_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2aa/8079045/3948f6902f47/ZEPT_A_1909281_F0003_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2aa/8079045/8483feefbe3c/ZEPT_A_1909281_F0004_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2aa/8079045/1baca28d7d3d/ZEPT_A_1909281_F0005_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2aa/8079045/f82f8868f6c0/ZEPT_A_1909281_F0006_B.jpg

相似文献

1
Eye-tracking exploration of inhibitory control in post-traumatic stress disorder: an emotional antisaccade paradigm.创伤后应激障碍中抑制控制的眼动追踪研究:一种情绪性反扫视范式。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2021 Apr 26;12(1):1909281. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2021.1909281.
2
Neuropsychological measurement of inhibitory control in posttraumatic stress disorder: An exploratory antisaccade paradigm.创伤后应激障碍中抑制控制的神经心理学测量:一种探索性的反扫视范式。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2017 Dec;39(10):1002-1012. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2017.1301389. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
3
Attentional control deficits in social anxiety: Investigating inhibition and shifting functions using a mixed antisaccade paradigm.社交焦虑中的注意控制缺陷:使用混合反扫视范式研究抑制和转换功能。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2018 Sep;60:46-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2018.03.004. Epub 2018 Mar 19.
4
Cognitive flexibility and attentional patterns among trauma survivors: preliminary evidence from an eye-tracking study.创伤后幸存者的认知灵活性和注意力模式:来自眼动追踪研究的初步证据。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2022 Apr 20;13(1):2055296. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2022.2055296. eCollection 2022.
5
Attentional engagement and inhibitory control according to positive and negative symptoms in schizophrenia: An emotional antisaccade task.精神分裂症患者正性和负性症状的注意投入和抑制控制:情绪性反扫视任务。
Schizophr Res. 2022 Jan;239:142-150. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2021.11.044. Epub 2021 Dec 7.
6
Attention to threat in posttraumatic stress disorder as indexed by eye-tracking indices: a systematic review.创伤后应激障碍的眼动追踪指标对威胁的注意:系统评价。
Psychol Med. 2019 Apr;49(5):705-726. doi: 10.1017/S0033291718002313. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
7
Assessing anxiety-linked impairment in attentional control without eye-tracking: The masked-target antisaccade task.在不使用眼动追踪的情况下评估与焦虑相关的注意力控制障碍:掩蔽目标反扫视任务。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Jan;55(1):135-142. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01800-z. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
8
Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), cognitive control, and perceived seizure control in patients with epilepsy: An exploratory study.癫痫患者的创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)、认知控制与感知到的癫痫发作控制:一项探索性研究。
Epilepsy Behav. 2023 Oct;147:109396. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2023.109396. Epub 2023 Aug 22.
9
Attentional bias in post-traumatic stress disorder diminishes after symptom amelioration.创伤后应激障碍的注意力偏向在症状改善后会减弱。
Behav Res Ther. 2011 Nov;49(11):796-801. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2011.08.006. Epub 2011 Sep 2.
10
Attentional processes during emotional face perception in social anxiety disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis of eye-tracking findings.社交焦虑障碍患者情绪面孔感知过程中的注意:眼动研究的系统综述和荟萃分析。
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2021 Dec 20;111:110353. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2021.110353. Epub 2021 May 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Inhibitory control impairments underlie associative memory deficits in posttraumatic stress disorder.抑制控制障碍是创伤后应激障碍中联想记忆缺陷的基础。
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 14;20(8):e0329810. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329810. eCollection 2025.
2
Early processing of traumatic material and contextual information in posttraumatic stress disorder and its relation to memory impairments.创伤后应激障碍中创伤性材料和情境信息的早期处理及其与记忆障碍的关系
Sci Rep. 2025 May 11;15(1):16362. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-00322-w.
3
Maternal Experiences of Trauma and Toddler Multisensory Attention Skills in a South African Community Cohort.

本文引用的文献

1
Affective Ratings of Pictures Related to Interpersonal Situations.与人际情境相关图片的情感评分。
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 5;12:627849. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.627849. eCollection 2021.
2
Generalization of fear in post-traumatic stress disorder.创伤后应激障碍中的恐惧泛化。
Psychophysiology. 2020 Jan;57(1):e13422. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13422. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
3
Attention to threat in posttraumatic stress disorder as indexed by eye-tracking indices: a systematic review.创伤后应激障碍的眼动追踪指标对威胁的注意:系统评价。
南非社区队列中母亲的创伤经历与幼儿多感官注意力技能
Infancy. 2025 Mar-Apr;30(2):e70017. doi: 10.1111/infa.70017.
4
Examining attentional avoidance in post-traumatic stress disorder: an exploratory 'Face in the Crowd' paradigm using eye-tracking.创伤后应激障碍中注意力回避的研究:一项使用眼动追踪技术的探索性“人群中的面孔”范式
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025 Dec;16(1):2462489. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2025.2462489. Epub 2025 Feb 12.
5
Cognitive flexibility and attentional patterns among trauma survivors: preliminary evidence from an eye-tracking study.创伤后幸存者的认知灵活性和注意力模式:来自眼动追踪研究的初步证据。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2022 Apr 20;13(1):2055296. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2022.2055296. eCollection 2022.
Psychol Med. 2019 Apr;49(5):705-726. doi: 10.1017/S0033291718002313. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
4
Event-related potentials of attentional bias toward faces in the dot-probe task: A systematic review.点探测任务中对面孔注意偏向的事件相关电位:一项系统综述。
Psychophysiology. 2018 Jun;55(6):e13051. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13051. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
5
Neuropsychological measurement of inhibitory control in posttraumatic stress disorder: An exploratory antisaccade paradigm.创伤后应激障碍中抑制控制的神经心理学测量:一种探索性的反扫视范式。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2017 Dec;39(10):1002-1012. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2017.1301389. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
6
Mechanisms of saccade suppression revealed in the anti-saccade task.在反扫视任务中揭示的扫视抑制机制。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2017 Apr 19;372(1718). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0192.
7
Suppression of overt attentional capture by salient-but-irrelevant color singletons.显著但不相关的颜色单一物对明显注意捕获的抑制。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 Jan;79(1):45-62. doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1209-1.
8
04-03 The neural networks of inhibitory control in post-traumatic stress disorder.04 - 03创伤后应激障碍中抑制控制的神经网络
Acta Neuropsychiatr. 2006 Dec;18(6):323. doi: 10.1017/S0924270800032087.
9
Evidence-based treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder.创伤后应激障碍的循证治疗。
Annu Rev Med. 2014;65:319-32. doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-051812-145438.
10
Increased response variability as a marker of executive dysfunction in veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder.创伤后应激障碍退伍军人的执行功能障碍标志物:反应可变性增加。
Neuropsychologia. 2013 Dec;51(14):3033-40. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.10.008. Epub 2013 Oct 21.