• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在 MRI 中,与功能相比,单个体素结构相似性矩阵可提高自闭症患者分类的准确性。

Single-participant structural similarity matrices lead to greater accuracy in classification of participants than function in autism in MRI.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Robinson Way, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, CB2 0SZ, UK.

Center for Systems Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 149 13th Street, Boston, MA, 02129, USA.

出版信息

Mol Autism. 2021 May 10;12(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s13229-021-00439-5.

DOI:10.1186/s13229-021-00439-5
PMID:33971956
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8112019/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Autism has previously been characterized by both structural and functional differences in brain connectivity. However, while the literature on single-subject derivations of functional connectivity is extensively developed, similar methods of structural connectivity or similarity derivation from T1 MRI are less studied.

METHODS

We introduce a technique of deriving symmetric similarity matrices from regional histograms of grey matter volumes estimated from T1-weighted MRIs. We then validated the technique by inputting the similarity matrices into a convolutional neural network (CNN) to classify between participants with autism and age-, motion-, and intracranial-volume-matched controls from six different databases (29,288 total connectomes, mean age = 30.72, range 0.42-78.00, including 1555 subjects with autism). We compared this method to similar classifications of the same participants using fMRI connectivity matrices as well as univariate estimates of grey matter volumes. We further applied graph-theoretical metrics on output class activation maps to identify areas of the matrices that the CNN preferentially used to make the classification, focusing particularly on hubs.

LIMITATIONS

While this study used a large sample size, the majority of data was from a young age group; furthermore, to make a viable machine learning study, we treated autism, a highly heterogeneous condition, as a binary label. Thus, these results are not necessarily generalizable to all subtypes and age groups in autism.

RESULTS

Our models gave AUROCs of 0.7298 (69.71% accuracy) when classifying by only structural similarity, 0.6964 (67.72% accuracy) when classifying by only functional connectivity, and 0.7037 (66.43% accuracy) when classifying by univariate grey matter volumes. Combining structural similarity and functional connectivity gave an AUROC of 0.7354 (69.40% accuracy). Analysis of classification performance across age revealed the greatest accuracy in adolescents, in which most data were present. Graph analysis of class activation maps revealed no distinguishable network patterns for functional inputs, but did reveal localized differences between groups in bilateral Heschl's gyrus and upper vermis for structural similarity.

CONCLUSION

This study provides a simple means of feature extraction for inputting large numbers of structural MRIs into machine learning models. Our methods revealed a unique emphasis of the deep learning model on the structure of the bilateral Heschl's gyrus when characterizing autism.

摘要

背景

自闭症以前被认为具有大脑连接的结构和功能差异。然而,虽然关于功能连接的单主题推导的文献已经很发达,但类似的结构连接或从 T1 MRI 推导相似性的方法研究较少。

方法

我们介绍了一种从 T1 加权 MRI 估计的灰质体积的区域直方图中导出对称相似矩阵的技术。然后,我们通过将相似矩阵输入卷积神经网络(CNN)来验证该技术,以将自闭症患者与来自六个不同数据库的年龄、运动和颅内体积匹配的对照组(总共 29288 个连接组,平均年龄为 30.72 岁,范围为 0.42-78.00,包括 1555 名自闭症患者)进行分类。我们将这种方法与使用 fMRI 连接矩阵和灰质体积的单变量估计对相同参与者进行的类似分类进行了比较。我们进一步应用图论度量来识别 CNN 优先用于分类的矩阵区域,特别关注枢纽。

局限性

虽然这项研究使用了大量样本,但大多数数据来自年轻年龄段;此外,为了进行可行的机器学习研究,我们将自闭症(一种高度异质的疾病)视为二分类标签。因此,这些结果不一定适用于自闭症的所有亚型和年龄组。

结果

当仅通过结构相似性进行分类时,我们的模型给出了 0.7298 的 AUROC(69.71%的准确率),当仅通过功能连接进行分类时,给出了 0.6964 的 AUROC(67.72%的准确率),当通过单变量灰质体积进行分类时,给出了 0.7037 的 AUROC(66.43%的准确率)。结构相似性和功能连接的结合给出了 0.7354 的 AUROC(69.40%的准确率)。对分类性能随年龄的分析表明,在青少年中具有最高的准确性,其中存在大多数数据。对分类激活图的图分析显示,功能输入没有可区分的网络模式,但确实显示了结构相似性中双侧海氏回和上蚓部之间的组间局部差异。

结论

这项研究为将大量结构 MRI 输入机器学习模型提供了一种简单的特征提取方法。我们的方法揭示了深度学习模型在表征自闭症时对双侧海氏回结构的独特重视。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcec/8112019/4591f7bceef2/13229_2021_439_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcec/8112019/dc18fd9f1435/13229_2021_439_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcec/8112019/ff21da825b32/13229_2021_439_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcec/8112019/cb5e31405015/13229_2021_439_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcec/8112019/4403fc243254/13229_2021_439_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcec/8112019/4c379c860f50/13229_2021_439_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcec/8112019/ecf9a8735e3f/13229_2021_439_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcec/8112019/9cf137b5c894/13229_2021_439_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcec/8112019/4591f7bceef2/13229_2021_439_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcec/8112019/dc18fd9f1435/13229_2021_439_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcec/8112019/ff21da825b32/13229_2021_439_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcec/8112019/cb5e31405015/13229_2021_439_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcec/8112019/4403fc243254/13229_2021_439_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcec/8112019/4c379c860f50/13229_2021_439_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcec/8112019/ecf9a8735e3f/13229_2021_439_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcec/8112019/9cf137b5c894/13229_2021_439_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcec/8112019/4591f7bceef2/13229_2021_439_Fig8_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Single-participant structural similarity matrices lead to greater accuracy in classification of participants than function in autism in MRI.在 MRI 中,与功能相比,单个体素结构相似性矩阵可提高自闭症患者分类的准确性。
Mol Autism. 2021 May 10;12(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s13229-021-00439-5.
2
Functional connectivity magnetic resonance imaging classification of autism.功能连接磁共振成像分类孤独症。
Brain. 2011 Dec;134(Pt 12):3742-54. doi: 10.1093/brain/awr263. Epub 2011 Oct 17.
3
Identification of Autism Subtypes Based on Wavelet Coherence of BOLD FMRI Signals Using Convolutional Neural Network.基于卷积神经网络的 BOLD fMRI 信号小波相干性的自闭症亚型识别。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Aug 4;21(16):5256. doi: 10.3390/s21165256.
4
Influence of Primary Auditory Cortex in the Characterization of Autism Spectrum in Young Adults using Brain Connectivity Parameters and Deep Belief Networks: An fMRI Study.基于脑连接参数和深度置信网络的初级听觉皮层对青年自闭症谱系特征的影响:一项 fMRI 研究。
Curr Med Imaging. 2020;16(9):1059-1073. doi: 10.2174/1573405615666191111142039.
5
Mapping the brain in autism. A voxel-based MRI study of volumetric differences and intercorrelations in autism.绘制自闭症患者的大脑图谱。一项基于体素的磁共振成像研究,探讨自闭症患者的体积差异和相互关系。
Brain. 2005 Feb;128(Pt 2):268-76. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh332. Epub 2004 Nov 17.
6
fMRI volume classification using a 3D convolutional neural network robust to shifted and scaled neuronal activations.使用对移位和缩放神经元激活具有鲁棒性的 3D 卷积神经网络进行 fMRI 体积分类。
Neuroimage. 2020 Dec;223:117328. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117328. Epub 2020 Sep 5.
7
Functional connectivity based machine learning approach for autism detection in young children using MEG signals.基于功能连接性的机器学习方法,利用脑磁图信号检测幼儿自闭症
J Neural Eng. 2023 Mar 14;20(2). doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/acbe1f.
8
Stratifying ASD and characterizing the functional connectivity of subtypes in resting-state fMRI.在静息态 fMRI 中对 ASD 进行分层并对亚型的功能连接进行特征化。
Behav Brain Res. 2023 Jul 9;449:114458. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2023.114458. Epub 2023 Apr 29.
9
Decoding Autism: Uncovering patterns in brain connectivity through sparsity analysis with rs-fMRI data.解码自闭症:通过 rs-fMRI 数据稀疏分析揭示大脑连接模式。
J Neurosci Methods. 2024 May;405:110100. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2024.110100. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
10
Functional MRI connectivity of children with autism and low verbal and cognitive performance.自闭症儿童的功能磁共振连接与语言和认知表现低下有关。
Mol Autism. 2018 Dec 27;9:67. doi: 10.1186/s13229-018-0248-y. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Structural Brain Imaging Biomarkers of Autism Spectrum Disorder.自闭症谱系障碍的结构性脑影像学生物标志物。
Adv Neurobiol. 2024;40:491-509. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-69491-2_17.
2
Machine learning in small sample neuroimaging studies: Novel measures for schizophrenia analysis.小样本神经影像学研究中的机器学习:精神分裂症分析的新指标。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2024 Apr;45(5):e26555. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26555.
3
A face image classification method of autistic children based on the two-phase transfer learning.一种基于两阶段迁移学习的自闭症儿童面部图像分类方法。

本文引用的文献

1
Deep learning for sex classification in resting-state and task functional brain networks from the UK Biobank.基于英国生物库静息态和任务功能脑网络的深度学习进行性别分类。
Neuroimage. 2021 Nov 1;241:118409. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118409. Epub 2021 Jul 20.
2
Functional Connectivities Are More Informative Than Anatomical Variables in Diagnostic Classification of Autism.功能连接比解剖变量在自闭症的诊断分类中更具信息性。
Brain Connect. 2019 Oct;9(8):604-612. doi: 10.1089/brain.2019.0689. Epub 2019 Aug 23.
3
Machine Learning Based Classification of Resting-State fMRI Features Exemplified by Metabolic State (Hunger/Satiety).
Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 31;14:1226470. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1226470. eCollection 2023.
4
Robust estimation of cortical similarity networks from brain MRI.从脑 MRI 中稳健估计皮质相似性网络。
Nat Neurosci. 2023 Aug;26(8):1461-1471. doi: 10.1038/s41593-023-01376-7. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
5
A Model for Diagnosing Autism Patients Using Spatial and Statistical Measures Using rs-fMRI and sMRI by Adopting Graphical Neural Networks.一种采用图形神经网络,利用静息态功能磁共振成像(rs-fMRI)和结构磁共振成像(sMRI)的空间和统计测量方法诊断自闭症患者的模型。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Mar 16;13(6):1143. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13061143.
6
Automatic autism spectrum disorder detection using artificial intelligence methods with MRI neuroimaging: A review.使用人工智能方法结合MRI神经成像技术进行自闭症谱系障碍的自动检测:综述
Front Mol Neurosci. 2022 Oct 4;15:999605. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2022.999605. eCollection 2022.
7
Machine learning for autism spectrum disorder diagnosis using structural magnetic resonance imaging: Promising but challenging.使用结构磁共振成像的机器学习用于自闭症谱系障碍诊断:前景广阔但也面临挑战。
Front Neuroinform. 2022 Sep 28;16:949926. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2022.949926. eCollection 2022.
基于机器学习的静息态功能磁共振成像特征分类:以代谢状态(饥饿/饱腹感)为例
Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 May 28;13:164. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00164. eCollection 2019.
4
Microstructural and functional gradients are increasingly dissociated in transmodal cortices.跨模态皮质中,微观结构和功能梯度越来越分离。
PLoS Biol. 2019 May 20;17(5):e3000284. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000284. eCollection 2019 May.
5
Topological Properties of Resting-State fMRI Functional Networks Improve Machine Learning-Based Autism Classification.静息态功能磁共振成像功能网络的拓扑特性改善基于机器学习的自闭症分类。
Front Neurosci. 2019 Jan 10;12:1018. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.01018. eCollection 2018.
6
Quantification of structural brain connectivity via a conductance model.通过导纳模型对结构脑连接进行定量分析。
Neuroimage. 2019 Apr 1;189:485-496. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.01.033. Epub 2019 Jan 21.
7
Morphometric Similarity Networks Detect Microscale Cortical Organization and Predict Inter-Individual Cognitive Variation.形态相似性网络可检测微尺度皮质组织并预测个体间认知差异。
Neuron. 2018 Jan 3;97(1):231-247.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.11.039. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
8
Structural covariance networks are coupled to expression of genes enriched in supragranular layers of the human cortex.结构协变网络与人类大脑皮层颗粒上层中富集的基因表达相关联。
Neuroimage. 2018 May 1;171:256-267. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.12.060. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
9
Structural Covariance of Sensory Networks, the Cerebellum, and Amygdala in Autism Spectrum Disorder.自闭症谱系障碍中感觉网络、小脑和杏仁核的结构协方差
Front Neurol. 2017 Nov 27;8:615. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00615. eCollection 2017.
10
Resting State fMRI Functional Connectivity-Based Classification Using a Convolutional Neural Network Architecture.基于静息态功能磁共振成像功能连接性的卷积神经网络架构分类
Front Neuroinform. 2017 Oct 17;11:61. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2017.00061. eCollection 2017.