• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发和验证机器学习模型以预测从急诊科收治入院和进入重症监护病房。

Development and Validation of Machine Learning Models to Predict Admission From Emergency Department to Inpatient and Intensive Care Units.

机构信息

Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; Duke Institute of Health Innovation, Durham, NC.

Duke Institute of Health Innovation, Durham, NC.

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 2021 Aug;78(2):290-302. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2021.02.029. Epub 2021 May 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2021.02.029
PMID:33972128
Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to develop and validate 2 machine learning models that use historical and current-visit patient data from electronic health records to predict the probability of patient admission to either an inpatient unit or ICU at each hour (up to 24 hours) of an emergency department (ED) encounter. The secondary goal was to provide a framework for the operational implementation of these machine learning models.

METHODS

Data were curated from 468,167 adult patient encounters in 3 EDs (1 academic and 2 community-based EDs) of a large academic health system from August 1, 2015, to October 31, 2018. The models were validated using encounter data from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2019. An operational user dashboard was developed, and the models were run on real-time encounter data.

RESULTS

For the intermediate admission model, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.873 and the area under the precision-recall curve was 0.636. For the ICU admission model, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.951 and the area under the precision-recall curve was 0.461. The models had similar performance in both the academic- and community-based settings as well as across the 2019 and real-time encounter data.

CONCLUSION

Machine learning models were developed to accurately make predictions regarding the probability of inpatient or ICU admission throughout the entire duration of a patient's encounter in ED and not just at the time of triage. These models remained accurate for a patient cohort beyond the time period of the initial training data and were integrated to run on live electronic health record data, with similar performance.

摘要

研究目的

本研究旨在开发和验证两个机器学习模型,这些模型使用电子病历中的历史和当前就诊患者数据,预测患者在急诊科就诊期间每小时(最多 24 小时)入住住院部或 ICU 的概率。次要目标是为这些机器学习模型的实际应用提供框架。

方法

从 2015 年 8 月 1 日至 2018 年 10 月 31 日期间,从一家大型学术医疗系统的 3 个急诊科(1 个学术性和 2 个社区性急诊科)的 468167 名成年患者就诊中整理数据。使用 2019 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 12 月 31 日期间的就诊数据验证模型。开发了一个操作型用户仪表板,并在实时就诊数据上运行模型。

结果

对于中级入院模型,接受者操作特征曲线下的面积为 0.873,精度-召回曲线下的面积为 0.636。对于 ICU 入院模型,接受者操作特征曲线下的面积为 0.951,精度-召回曲线下的面积为 0.461。这些模型在学术性和社区性环境中以及在 2019 年和实时就诊数据中都具有相似的性能。

结论

开发了机器学习模型,以便在患者在急诊科就诊的整个过程中准确预测住院或 ICU 入院的概率,而不仅仅是在分诊时。这些模型对于超出初始训练数据时间段的患者队列仍然准确,并且集成到实时电子病历数据上运行,具有相似的性能。

相似文献

1
Development and Validation of Machine Learning Models to Predict Admission From Emergency Department to Inpatient and Intensive Care Units.开发和验证机器学习模型以预测从急诊科收治入院和进入重症监护病房。
Ann Emerg Med. 2021 Aug;78(2):290-302. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2021.02.029. Epub 2021 May 8.
2
Prospective and External Evaluation of a Machine Learning Model to Predict In-Hospital Mortality of Adults at Time of Admission.机器学习模型对入院时成人院内死亡率的前瞻性和外部评估。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Feb 5;3(2):e1920733. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.20733.
3
Predicting hospital admission at the emergency department triage: A novel prediction model.预测急诊科分诊中的住院:一种新的预测模型。
Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Aug;37(8):1498-1504. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.10.060. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
4
Emergency department triage prediction of clinical outcomes using machine learning models.运用机器学习模型对急诊科患者临床结局进行分诊预测。
Crit Care. 2019 Feb 22;23(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2351-7.
5
Development and Assessment of an Interpretable Machine Learning Triage Tool for Estimating Mortality After Emergency Admissions.开发和评估一种可解释的机器学习分诊工具,用于估算急诊入院后的死亡率。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Aug 2;4(8):e2118467. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.18467.
6
Prediction of In-hospital Mortality in Emergency Department Patients With Sepsis: A Local Big Data-Driven, Machine Learning Approach.急诊科脓毒症患者院内死亡率的预测:一种基于本地大数据驱动的机器学习方法。
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Mar;23(3):269-78. doi: 10.1111/acem.12876. Epub 2016 Feb 13.
7
Predicting hospital admission for older emergency department patients: Insights from machine learning.预测老年急诊科患者住院:来自机器学习的见解。
Int J Med Inform. 2020 Aug;140:104163. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104163. Epub 2020 May 16.
8
Predicting adult neuroscience intensive care unit admission from emergency department triage using a retrospective, tabular-free text machine learning approach.使用回顾性、无表格文本机器学习方法预测急诊科分诊后的成人神经科学重症监护病房收治。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 14;11(1):1381. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-80985-3.
9
Predicting hospital admissions at emergency department triage using routine administrative data.利用常规行政数据预测急诊科分诊的住院人数。
Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Aug;18(8):844-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01125.x.
10
Development and External Validation of a Machine Learning Tool to Rule Out COVID-19 Among Adults in the Emergency Department Using Routine Blood Tests: A Large, Multicenter, Real-World Study.利用常规血液检测排除急诊科成人COVID-19的机器学习工具的开发与外部验证:一项大型、多中心、真实世界研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Dec 2;22(12):e24048. doi: 10.2196/24048.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementation and Updating of Clinical Prediction Models: A Systematic Review.临床预测模型的实施与更新:一项系统综述
Mayo Clin Proc Digit Health. 2025 May 23;3(3):100228. doi: 10.1016/j.mcpdig.2025.100228. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Emergency Department Triage Accuracy and Delays in Care for High-Risk Conditions.急诊科对高危病症的分诊准确性及护理延误情况
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 May 1;8(5):e258498. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.8498.
3
Designing Health Care Provider-Centered Emergency Department Interventions: Participatory Design Study.
设计以医疗服务提供者为中心的急诊科干预措施:参与式设计研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Apr 21;9:e68891. doi: 10.2196/68891.
4
Hospitalization prediction from the emergency department using computer vision AI with short patient video clips.利用计算机视觉人工智能和患者短视频片段从急诊科进行住院预测。
NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Dec 19;7(1):371. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01375-3.
5
Using machine learning and natural language processing in triage for prediction of clinical disposition in the emergency department.在急诊科分诊中使用机器学习和自然语言处理来预测临床处置情况。
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):237. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-01152-1.
6
Using machine learning methods to predict all-cause somatic hospitalizations in adults: A systematic review.使用机器学习方法预测成年人全因躯体住院治疗:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 23;19(8):e0309175. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309175. eCollection 2024.
7
"Using network analysis modularity to group health code systems and decrease dimensionality in machine learning models".利用网络分析模块度对健康码系统进行分组并降低机器学习模型的维度
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2024 Jun 11;14:100463. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100463. eCollection 2024 Jun.
8
Automated analysis of unstructured clinical assessments improves emergency department triage performance: A retrospective deep learning analysis.非结构化临床评估的自动化分析可改善急诊科分诊表现:一项回顾性深度学习分析。
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2023 Jul 12;4(4):e13003. doi: 10.1002/emp2.13003. eCollection 2023 Aug.
9
Developing and Validating a Prediction Model For Death or Critical Illness in Hospitalized Adults, an Opportunity for Human-Computer Collaboration.开发并验证住院成人死亡或重症预测模型:人机协作的契机
Crit Care Explor. 2023 May 1;5(5):e0897. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000897. eCollection 2023 May.
10
Data Science Implementation Trends in Nursing Practice: A Review of the 2021 Literature.护理实践中数据科学实施趋势:2021 年文献回顾。
Appl Clin Inform. 2023 May;14(3):585-593. doi: 10.1055/a-2088-2893. Epub 2023 May 7.