Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, United Kingdom.
Department of Health and Social Care, UK Government, London, United Kingdom.
Clin Infect Dis. 2022 Feb 11;74(3):407-415. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab421.
How severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infectivity varies with viral load is incompletely understood. Whether rapid point-of-care antigen lateral flow devices (LFDs) detect most potential transmission sources despite imperfect clinical sensitivity is unknown.
We combined SARS-CoV-2 testing and contact tracing data from England between 1 September 2020 and 28 February 2021. We used multivariable logistic regression to investigate relationships between polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-confirmed infection in contacts of community-diagnosed cases and index case viral load, S gene target failure (proxy for B.1.1.7 infection), demographics, SARS-CoV-2 incidence, social deprivation, and contact event type. We used LFD performance to simulate the proportion of cases with a PCR-positive contact expected to be detected using 1 of 4 LFDs.
In total, 231 498/2 474 066 (9%) contacts of 1 064 004 index cases tested PCR-positive. PCR-positive results in contacts independently increased with higher case viral loads (lower cycle threshold [Ct] values), for example, 11.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 11.5-12.0%) at Ct = 15 and 4.5% (95% CI 4.4-4.6%) at Ct = 30. B.1.1.7 infection increased PCR-positive results by ~50%, (eg, 1.55-fold, 95% CI 1.49-1.61, at Ct = 20). PCR-positive results were most common in household contacts (at Ct = 20.1, 8.7% [95% CI 8.6-8.9%]), followed by household visitors (7.1% [95% CI 6.8-7.3%]), contacts at events/activities (5.2% [95% CI 4.9-5.4%]), work/education (4.6% [95% CI 4.4-4.8%]), and least common after outdoor contact (2.9% [95% CI 2.3-3.8%]). Contacts of children were the least likely to test positive, particularly following contact outdoors or at work/education. The most and least sensitive LFDs would detect 89.5% (95% CI 89.4-89.6%) and 83.0% (95% CI 82.8-83.1%) of cases with PCR-positive contacts, respectively.
SARS-CoV-2 infectivity varies by case viral load, contact event type, and age. Those with high viral loads are the most infectious. B.1.1.7 increased transmission by ~50%. The best performing LFDs detect most infectious cases.
人们对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)的感染力随病毒载量的变化知之甚少。尽管临床灵敏度不高,快速即时检测抗原侧向流动设备(LFD)是否能检测到大多数潜在的传播源尚不清楚。
我们结合了 2020 年 9 月 1 日至 2021 年 2 月 28 日期间英国的 SARS-CoV-2 检测和接触者追踪数据。我们使用多变量逻辑回归来研究社区诊断病例的接触者中经聚合酶链反应(PCR)确认的感染与指数病例病毒载量、S 基因靶标失败(B.1.1.7 感染的替代指标)、人口统计学、SARS-CoV-2 发病率、社会贫困和接触事件类型之间的关系。我们使用 LFD 性能模拟使用 4 种 LFD 中的 1 种检测到具有 PCR 阳性接触者的预期比例。
总共,231498/2474066(9%)的 1064004 例指数病例的接触者接受了 PCR 检测呈阳性。PCR 阳性结果在接触者中独立于更高的病例病毒载量而增加(较低的循环阈值[Ct]值),例如 Ct = 15 时为 11.7%(95%置信区间[CI]11.5-12.0%),Ct = 30 时为 4.5%(95% CI 4.4-4.6%)。B.1.1.7 感染使 PCR 阳性结果增加了约 50%(例如,Ct = 20 时为 1.55 倍,95% CI 1.49-1.61)。家庭接触者的 PCR 阳性结果最为常见(Ct = 20.1 时,为 8.7%[95% CI 8.6-8.9%]),其次是家庭访客(7.1%[95% CI 6.8-7.3%])、活动/活动中的接触者(5.2%[95% CI 4.9-5.4%])、工作/教育(4.6%[95% CI 4.4-4.8%]),户外接触后最不常见(2.9%[95% CI 2.3-3.8%])。儿童的接触者最不可能检测呈阳性,尤其是在户外或工作/教育接触后。最敏感和最不敏感的 LFD 将分别检测到 89.5%(95% CI 89.4-89.6%)和 83.0%(95% CI 82.8-83.1%)的具有 PCR 阳性接触者的病例。
SARS-CoV-2 的传染性随病例病毒载量、接触事件类型和年龄而变化。那些具有高病毒载量的人最具传染性。B.1.1.7 增加了约 50%的传播。性能最好的 LFD 可以检测到大多数具有传染性的病例。