• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

贝叶斯框架增强肿瘤委员会决策。

Bayesian Framework to Augment Tumor Board Decision Making.

机构信息

Department of Integrated Mathematical Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer & Research Institute, Tampa, FL.

Department of Radiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer & Research Institute, Tampa, FL.

出版信息

JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2021 May;5:508-517. doi: 10.1200/CCI.20.00085.

DOI:10.1200/CCI.20.00085
PMID:33974446
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8240793/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Ideally, specific treatment for a cancer patient is decided by a multidisciplinary tumor board, integrating prior clinical experience, published data, and patient-specific factors to develop a consensus on an optimal therapeutic strategy. However, many oncologists lack access to a tumor board, and many patients have incomplete data descriptions so that tumor boards must act on imprecise criteria. We propose these limitations to be addressed through a flexible but rigorous mathematical tool that can define the probability of success of given therapies and be made readily available to the oncology community.

METHODS

We present a Bayesian approach to tumor forecasting using a multimodel framework to predict patient-specific response to different targeted therapies even when historical data are incomplete.

RESULTS

We demonstrate that the Bayesian decision theory's integrative power permits the simultaneous assessment of a range of therapeutic options.

CONCLUSION

This methodology proposed, built upon a robust and well-established mathematical framework, can play a crucial role in supporting patient-specific clinical decisions by individual oncologists and multispecialty tumor boards.

摘要

目的

理想情况下,癌症患者的具体治疗方案由多学科肿瘤委员会决定,该委员会综合了先前的临床经验、已发表的数据以及患者的具体情况,以就最佳治疗策略达成共识。然而,许多肿瘤学家无法获得肿瘤委员会的支持,并且许多患者的数据描述不完整,因此肿瘤委员会必须根据不精确的标准进行决策。我们提出通过灵活但严格的数学工具来解决这些限制,该工具可以定义给定治疗方法的成功概率,并可供肿瘤学界随时使用。

方法

我们提出了一种基于贝叶斯理论的肿瘤预测方法,该方法使用多模型框架来预测患者对不同靶向治疗的特定反应,即使在历史数据不完整的情况下也是如此。

结果

我们证明了贝叶斯决策理论的综合能力允许同时评估一系列治疗选择。

结论

该方法基于稳健且成熟的数学框架构建,可以在支持个体肿瘤学家和多学科肿瘤委员会的患者特定临床决策方面发挥关键作用。

相似文献

1
Bayesian Framework to Augment Tumor Board Decision Making.贝叶斯框架增强肿瘤委员会决策。
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2021 May;5:508-517. doi: 10.1200/CCI.20.00085.
2
Validation workflow for a clinical Bayesian network model in multidisciplinary decision making in head and neck oncology treatment.头颈部肿瘤治疗中多学科决策的临床贝叶斯网络模型的验证工作流程。
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2017 Nov;12(11):1959-1970. doi: 10.1007/s11548-017-1531-7. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
3
Decision making in pediatric oncology: Views of parents and physicians in two European countries.儿科肿瘤学中的决策制定:两个欧洲国家父母与医生的观点
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2017 Jan-Mar;8(1):21-31. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2016.1234519. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
4
Tumour boards in geriatric oncology.老年肿瘤肿瘤委员会
Age Ageing. 2018 Mar 1;47(2):168-170. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afx171.
5
Predictors of Treatment Decisions in Multidisciplinary Oncology Meetings: A Quantitative Observational Study.多学科肿瘤学会议中治疗决策的预测因素:一项定量观察性研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Dec;23(13):4410-4417. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5347-4. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
6
The effect of decision analysis on clinical uncertainty at tumor board.决策分析对肿瘤多学科会诊中临床不确定性的影响。
J Cancer Educ. 1990;5(2):125-34. doi: 10.1080/08858199009528050.
7
Software-Tool Support for Collaborative, Virtual, Multi-Site Molecular Tumor Boards.用于协作式、虚拟、多站点分子肿瘤委员会的软件工具支持
SN Comput Sci. 2023;4(4):358. doi: 10.1007/s42979-023-01771-8. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
8
How oncologists communicate information to women with recurrent ovarian cancer in the context of treatment decision making in the medical encounter.肿瘤学家在医疗问诊中的治疗决策背景下,如何向复发性卵巢癌女性传达信息。
Health Expect. 2015 Oct;18(5):1066-80. doi: 10.1111/hex.12079. Epub 2013 May 13.
9
START: a European state-of-the-art on-line instrument for clinical oncologists.开始:一款面向临床肿瘤学家的欧洲先进在线仪器。
Ann Oncol. 1999 Jul;10(7):769-73. doi: 10.1023/a:1008318029326.
10
"Often Relatives are the Key […]" -Family Involvement in Treatment Decision Making in Patients with Advanced Cancer Near the End of Life.“亲属往往是关键因素[…]”——晚期癌症临终患者治疗决策中的家庭参与
Oncologist. 2021 May;26(5):e831-e837. doi: 10.1002/onco.13557. Epub 2020 Oct 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Validating the predictions of mathematical models describing tumor growth and treatment response.验证描述肿瘤生长和治疗反应的数学模型的预测结果。
ArXiv. 2025 Feb 26:arXiv:2502.19333v1.
2
Calibrating tumor growth and invasion parameters with spectral spatial analysis of cancer biopsy tissues.通过癌症活检组织的光谱空间分析校准肿瘤生长和侵袭参数。
NPJ Syst Biol Appl. 2024 Oct 2;10(1):112. doi: 10.1038/s41540-024-00439-0.
3
Treatment of evolving cancers will require dynamic decision support.不断演变的癌症的治疗将需要动态的决策支持。

本文引用的文献

1
Integrating Mathematical Modeling into the Roadmap for Personalized Adaptive Radiation Therapy.将数学建模融入个性化自适应放射治疗路线图
Trends Cancer. 2019 Aug;5(8):467-474. doi: 10.1016/j.trecan.2019.06.006. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
2
An updated PREDICT breast cancer prognostication and treatment benefit prediction model with independent validation.一种经过更新且具有独立验证的PREDICT乳腺癌预后及治疗获益预测模型。
Breast Cancer Res. 2017 May 22;19(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s13058-017-0852-3.
3
Validity of Adjuvant! Online program in older patients with breast cancer: a population-based study.
Ann Oncol. 2023 Oct;34(10):867-884. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.08.008.
4
Factors influencing the quality and functioning of oncological multidisciplinary team meetings: results of a systematic review.影响肿瘤多学科团队会议质量和功能的因素:系统评价的结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jun 27;22(1):829. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08112-0.
5
Integrating mechanism-based modeling with biomedical imaging to build practical digital twins for clinical oncology.将基于机制的建模与生物医学成像相结合,为临床肿瘤学构建实用的数字孪生模型。
Biophys Rev (Melville). 2022 Jun;3(2):021304. doi: 10.1063/5.0086789. Epub 2022 May 17.
6
Mathematical oncology: A new frontier in cancer biology and clinical decision making: Comment on "Improving cancer treatments via dynamical biophysical models" by M. Kuznetsov, J. Clairambault & V. Volpert.数学肿瘤学:癌症生物学与临床决策的新前沿:对M. 库兹涅佐夫、J. 克莱拉姆博和V. 沃尔佩特所著《通过动态生物物理模型改善癌症治疗》的评论
Phys Life Rev. 2022 Mar;40:60-62. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2021.11.005. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
辅助在线计划在老年乳腺癌患者中的有效性:一项基于人群的研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Jun;15(7):722-9. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70200-1. Epub 2014 May 13.
4
PREDICT: a new UK prognostic model that predicts survival following surgery for invasive breast cancer.PREDICT:一种新的英国预后模型,可预测浸润性乳腺癌手术后的生存情况。
Breast Cancer Res. 2010;12(1):R1. doi: 10.1186/bcr2464. Epub 2010 Jan 6.
5
Population-based validation of the prognostic model ADJUVANT! for early breast cancer.基于人群的早期乳腺癌预后模型ADJUVANT! 的验证
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Apr 20;23(12):2716-25. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.06.178.
6
Long short-term memory.长短期记忆
Neural Comput. 1997 Nov 15;9(8):1735-80. doi: 10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735.
7
ISMOD: an all-subsets regression program for generalized linear models. II. Program guide and examples.ISMOD:广义线性模型的全子集回归程序。II. 程序指南及示例。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 1987 Apr;24(2):125-34. doi: 10.1016/0169-2607(87)90023-x.
8
ISMOD: an all-subsets regression program for generalized linear models. I. Statistical and computational background.ISMOD:一种用于广义线性模型的全子集回归程序。I. 统计与计算背景
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 1987 Apr;24(2):117-24. doi: 10.1016/0169-2607(87)90022-8.