• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

代理安全措施综述及其在联网和自动驾驶汽车安全建模中的应用。

A review of surrogate safety measures and their applications in connected and automated vehicles safety modeling.

机构信息

School of Transportation, Southeast University, China.

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Massachusetts Lowell, 1 University Ave, Lowell, MA 01854, United States.

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Jul;157:106157. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106157. Epub 2021 May 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2021.106157
PMID:33975090
Abstract

Surrogate Safety Measures (SSM) are important for safety performance evaluation, since crashes are rare events and historical crash data does not capture near crashes that are also critical for improving safety. This paper focuses on SSM and their applications, particularly in Connected and Automated Vehicles (CAV) safety modeling. It aims to provide a comprehensive and systematic review of significant SSM studies, identify limitations and opportunities for future SSM and CAV research, and assist researchers and practitioners with choosing the most appropriate SSM for safety studies. The behaviors of CAV can be very different from those of Human-Driven Vehicles (HDV). Even among CAV with different automation/connectivity levels, their behaviors are likely to differ. Also, the behaviors of HDV can change in response to the existence of CAV in mixed autonomy traffic. Simulation by far is the most viable solution to model CAV safety. However, it is questionable whether conventional SSM can be applied to modeling CAV safety based on simulation results due to the lack of sophisticated simulation tools that can accurately model CAV behaviors and SSM that can take CAV's powerful sensing and path prediction and planning capabilities into crash risk modeling, although some researchers suggested that proper simulation model calibration can be helpful to address these issues. A number of critical questions related to SSM for CAV safety research are also identified and discussed, including SSM for CAV trajectory optimization, SSM for individual vehicles and vehicle platoon, and CAV as a new data source for developing SSM.

摘要

替代安全措施(SSM)对于安全性能评估很重要,因为事故是罕见事件,历史事故数据无法捕捉到对提高安全性也很关键的近事故。本文重点介绍了 SSM 及其应用,特别是在联网和自动驾驶车辆(CAV)安全建模中。本文旨在对重要的 SSM 研究进行全面系统的回顾,确定未来 SSM 和 CAV 研究的局限性和机遇,并帮助研究人员和从业者选择最适合安全研究的 SSM。CAV 的行为可能与人类驾驶车辆(HDV)有很大不同。即使是具有不同自动化/连接水平的 CAV,它们的行为也可能不同。此外,HDV 的行为可能会随着混合自治交通中 CAV 的存在而发生变化。到目前为止,模拟是建模 CAV 安全的最可行的解决方案。然而,由于缺乏能够准确模拟 CAV 行为的复杂模拟工具,以及能够将 CAV 强大的感知和路径预测和规划能力纳入事故风险建模的 SSM,因此基于模拟结果,传统的 SSM 是否可以应用于建模 CAV 安全是值得怀疑的,尽管一些研究人员建议适当的模拟模型校准可能有助于解决这些问题。还确定并讨论了与 CAV 安全研究相关的一些关键 SSM 问题,包括 CAV 轨迹优化的 SSM、个体车辆和车辆编队的 SSM 以及 CAV 作为开发 SSM 的新数据源。

相似文献

1
A review of surrogate safety measures and their applications in connected and automated vehicles safety modeling.代理安全措施综述及其在联网和自动驾驶汽车安全建模中的应用。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Jul;157:106157. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106157. Epub 2021 May 8.
2
Explicitly incorporating surrogate safety measures into connected and automated vehicle longitudinal control objectives for enhancing platoon safety.明确将替代安全措施纳入连接和自动驾驶车辆纵向控制目标,以提高车队安全。
Accid Anal Prev. 2023 Apr;183:106975. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2023.106975. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
3
Comprehensive safety assessment in mixed fleets with connected and automated vehicles: A crash severity and rate evaluation of conventional vehicles.混合车队中的综合安全评估:连接和自动化车辆的碰撞严重程度和速率评估——传统车辆。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Jul;142:105567. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105567. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
4
Influence of the feedback links of connected and automated vehicle on rear-end collision risks with vehicle-to-vehicle communication.联网与自动驾驶车辆的反馈链路对车对车通信时追尾碰撞风险的影响。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2019;20(1):79-83. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2018.1527469. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
5
From conflicts to crashes: Simulating macroscopic connected and automated driving vehicle safety.从冲突到碰撞:模拟宏观连接和自动驾驶车辆安全。
Accid Anal Prev. 2023 Jul;187:107087. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2023.107087. Epub 2023 Apr 23.
6
Evaluating the safety impact of connected and autonomous vehicles on motorways.评估高速公路上互联和自动驾驶汽车的安全影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Mar;124:12-22. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.12.019. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
7
Impact Evaluation of Cyberattacks on Connected and Automated Vehicles in Mixed Traffic Flow and Its Resilient and Robust Control Strategy.混合交通流中联网和自动驾驶汽车网络攻击的影响评估及其弹性和鲁棒控制策略。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Dec 21;23(1):74. doi: 10.3390/s23010074.
8
Review on big data applications in safety research of intelligent transportation systems and connected/automated vehicles.综述:大数据在智能交通系统和车联网/自动驾驶汽车安全研究中的应用。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Oct;146:105711. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105711. Epub 2020 Sep 4.
9
Is vehicle automation enough to prevent crashes? Role of traffic operations in automated driving environments for traffic safety.车辆自动化足以预防撞车事故吗?交通运营在自动驾驶环境中对交通安全的作用。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Jul;104:115-124. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.05.002. Epub 2017 May 10.
10
Network-wide safety impacts of dedicated lanes for connected and autonomous vehicles.联网自动驾驶汽车专用道的全网安全影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2024 Feb;195:107424. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2023.107424. Epub 2023 Dec 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Collision risk analysis in the merging area of interchanges using Monte Carlo traffic simulation.使用蒙特卡洛交通模拟对互通式立交合流区域的碰撞风险分析
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 15;20(9):e0330224. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330224. eCollection 2025.
2
Prediction of traffic accidents trend with learning methods: a case study for Batman, Turkey.用学习方法预测交通事故趋势:以土耳其蝙蝠侠市为例
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 22;15(1):26566. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-11835-9.
3
Assessing safety in horizontal curves using surrogate safety measures and machine learning.
使用代理安全措施和机器学习评估水平曲线的安全性。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 11;15(1):12384. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-97384-7.
4
Traffic safety evaluation of emerging mixed traffic flow at freeway merging area considering driving behavior.考虑驾驶行为的高速公路合流区新兴混合交通流交通安全评价
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 28;15(1):10686. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-94658-y.
5
A Survey of Autonomous Vehicle Behaviors: Trajectory Planning Algorithms, Sensed Collision Risks, and User Expectations.自动驾驶车辆行为调查:轨迹规划算法、感知碰撞风险及用户期望
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Jul 24;24(15):4808. doi: 10.3390/s24154808.
6
Review of driving-behaviour simulation: VISSIM and artificial intelligence approach.驾驶行为模拟综述:VISSIM与人工智能方法
Heliyon. 2024 Feb 10;10(4):e25936. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25936. eCollection 2024 Feb 29.
7
Using millimeter-wave radar to evaluate the performance of dummy models for advanced driving assistance systems test.使用毫米波雷达评估用于高级驾驶辅助系统测试的假人模型性能。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 27;14(1):2303. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52766-1.
8
Insights into vehicle conflicts based on traffic flow dynamics.基于交通流动力学的车辆冲突洞察。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 17;14(1):1536. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-50017-3.
9
Motor Vehicle Crash Risk in Older Adult Drivers With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.老年注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)驾驶员的机动车碰撞风险。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Oct 2;6(10):e2336960. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.36960.
10
Modelling and Mitigating Secondary Crash Risk for Serial Tunnels on Freeway via Lighting-Related Microscopic Traffic Model with Inter-Lane Dependency.基于具有车道间相关性的与照明相关的微观交通模型对高速公路连续隧道的二次事故风险进行建模和缓解
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 9;20(4):3066. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043066.