Laboratorio Ecotono, INIBIOMA, CONICET, Universidad Nacional del Comahue, Quintral 1250, Bariloche, 8400, Argentina.
IRNAD, CONICET, Universidad Nacional de Río Negro, Mitre 630, Bariloche, 8400, Argentina.
New Phytol. 2021 Aug;231(4):1586-1598. doi: 10.1111/nph.17452. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
Greater susceptibility to herbivory can arise as an effect of crop domestication. One proposed explanation is that defenses decreased intentionally or unintentionally during the domestication process, but evidence for this remains elusive. An alternative but nonexclusive explanation is presumed selection for higher nutritional quality. We used a metaanalytical approach to examine susceptibility to herbivores in fruit and seed crops and their wild relatives. Our analyses provide novel insights into the mechanisms of increased susceptibility by evaluating whether it can be attributed to either a reduction in herbivore defensive traits, including direct/indirect and constitutive/inducible defenses, or an increase in the nutritional content of crops. The results confirm higher herbivory and lower levels of all types of defenses in crops compared to wild relatives, although indirect defenses were more affected than direct ones. Contrary to expectations, nutritional quality was lower in crops than in wild relatives, which may enhance biomass loss to herbivores if they increase consumption to meet nutritional requirements. Our findings represent an important advance in our understanding of how changes in defensive and nutritional traits following domestication could influence, in combination or individually, crop susceptibility to herbivore attacks.
作物驯化会导致其对食草动物的易感性增加。一种提出的解释是,在驯化过程中防御能力被有意或无意地削弱了,但这方面的证据仍然难以捉摸。另一种但非排他性的解释是,人们推测选择了更高的营养价值。我们使用荟萃分析的方法来研究水果和种子作物及其野生亲缘种对食草动物的易感性。我们的分析通过评估它是否可以归因于食草动物防御特性(包括直接/间接和组成型/诱导型防御)的减少或作物营养含量的增加,为增加易感性的机制提供了新的见解。结果证实,与野生亲缘种相比,作物中的食草动物取食量更大,防御水平更低,尽管间接防御比直接防御受到的影响更大。与预期相反,作物的营养价值低于野生亲缘种,如果它们为了满足营养需求而增加摄入量,可能会导致食草动物对生物量的损失增加。我们的研究结果代表了在理解驯化后防御和营养特性的变化如何结合或单独影响作物对食草动物攻击的易感性方面的重要进展。